230 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27836798)
1. Evaluation of Pulmonary Complications in Robotic-Assisted Gynecologic Surgery.
Burks C; Nelson L; Kumar D; Fogg L; Saha C; Guirguis A; Rotmensch J; Dewdney S
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017 Feb; 24(2):280-285. PubMed ID: 27836798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Robotic-Assisted Gynecologic Surgery and Perioperative Morbidity in Elderly Women.
Krause AK; Muntz HG; McGonigle KF
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(6):949-53. PubMed ID: 27287246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Obesity and perioperative pulmonary complications in robotic gynecologic surgery.
Wysham WZ; Kim KH; Roberts JM; Sullivan SA; Campbell SB; Roque DR; Moore DT; Gehrig PA; Boggess JF; Soper JT; Huh WK
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Jul; 213(1):33.e1-33.e7. PubMed ID: 25637843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Safety of robotic-assisted gynecologic surgery and early hospital discharge in elderly patients.
Madden N; Frey MK; Joo L; Lee J; Musselman K; Chern JY; Blank SV; Pothuri B
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Mar; 220(3):253.e1-253.e7. PubMed ID: 30557552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Single-port laparoscopy in gynecologic oncology: seven years of experience at a single institution.
Moulton L; Jernigan AM; Carr C; Freeman L; Escobar PF; Michener CM
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Nov; 217(5):610.e1-610.e8. PubMed ID: 28619688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Complications in robotic-assisted gynecologic surgery according to case type: a 6-year retrospective cohort study using Clavien-Dindo classification.
Wechter ME; Mohd J; Magrina JF; Cornella JL; Magtibay PM; Wilson JR; Kho RM
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2014; 21(5):844-50. PubMed ID: 24699301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Robotic-assisted gynecologic surgery in an older population: A comparison study.
Moore MS; Vo EH; Bhattarai B; Farley JH; Monk BJ; Willmott LJ; Chase DM
J Geriatr Oncol; 2023 Jul; 14(6):101533. PubMed ID: 37295288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Robotic Single-Site and Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery in Gynecology: Clinical Outcomes and Cost Analysis of a Matched Case-Control Study.
El Hachem L; Andikyan V; Mathews S; Friedman K; Poeran J; Shieh K; Geoghegan M; Gretz HF
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(5):760-8. PubMed ID: 26992935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A prospective comparison of postoperative pain and quality of life in robotic assisted vs conventional laparoscopic gynecologic surgery.
Zechmeister JR; Pua TL; Boyd LR; Blank SV; Curtin JP; Pothuri B
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Feb; 212(2):194.e1-7. PubMed ID: 25108142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Feasibility and Learning Curve of Robotic Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Surgery in Gynecology.
Buckley de Meritens A; Kim J; Dinkelspiel H; Chapman-Davis E; Caputo T; Holcomb KM
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017 Feb; 24(2):323-328. PubMed ID: 27867048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Single-site Versus Multiport Robotic Hysterectomy in Benign Gynecologic Diseases: A Retrospective Evaluation of Surgical Outcomes and Cost Analysis.
Bogliolo S; Ferrero S; Cassani C; Musacchi V; Zanellini F; Dominoni M; Spinillo A; Gardella B
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(4):603-9. PubMed ID: 26898895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Robotic versus laparoscopic surgery in gynecology: which should we use?
Fanfani F; Restaino S; Ercoli A; Chiantera V; Fagotti A; Gallotta V; Monterossi G; Cappuccio S; Scambia G
Minerva Ginecol; 2016 Aug; 68(4):423-30. PubMed ID: 26633042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Intraoperative Complications and Conversion to Laparatomy in Gynecologic Robotic Surgery.
Gokmen Karasu AF; Kıran G; Şanlıkan F
J Invest Surg; 2022 Apr; 35(4):912-915. PubMed ID: 34286632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Implementing robotic surgery to gynecologic oncology: the first 300 operations performed at a tertiary hospital.
Mäenpää M; Nieminen K; Tomás E; Luukkaala T; Mäenpää JU
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2015 May; 94(5):482-8. PubMed ID: 25721212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Robotic Surgery in Gynecology.
Moon AS; Garofalo J; Koirala P; Vu MT; Chuang L
Surg Clin North Am; 2020 Apr; 100(2):445-460. PubMed ID: 32169189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Early feasibility surveillance of gynecologic robotic-assisted surgeries in Japan.
Baba T; Mandai M; Nishi H; Nishii O; Kitawaki J; Sawada M; Isaka K; Fujii T
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2019 Apr; 45(4):787-793. PubMed ID: 30663169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Robotic single-port surgery using the da Vinci SP® surgical system for benign gynecologic disease: A preliminary report.
Shin HJ; Yoo HK; Lee JH; Lee SR; Jeong K; Moon HS
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Mar; 59(2):243-247. PubMed ID: 32127145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of Positioning Devices for Optimization of Outcomes in Laparoscopic and Robotic-Assisted Gynecologic Surgery.
Das D; Propst K; Wechter ME; Kho RM
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2019 Feb; 26(2):244-252.e1. PubMed ID: 30176363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Perioperative morbidity of gynecological laparoscopy. A prospective monocenter observational study.
Leonard F; Lecuru F; Rizk E; Chasset S; Robin F; Taurelle R
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2000 Feb; 79(2):129-34. PubMed ID: 10696961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Feasibility of Robotic-Assisted Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Surgery in the Gynecologic Oncology Setting.
Moukarzel LA; Fader AN; Tanner EJ
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017 Feb; 24(2):258-263. PubMed ID: 27815041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
