These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

58 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27837040)

  • 1. Brazilian Photographic Figure Rating Scale: Development and Psychometric Investigation.
    de Castro MR; Morgado FFDR; Junior IFF
    Percept Mot Skills; 2017 Feb; 124(1):131-144. PubMed ID: 27837040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Brazilian Photographic Figure Rating Scale for Men: Psychometric Investigation.
    de Castro MR; Morgado FFR; Freitas IF
    Percept Mot Skills; 2018 Jun; 125(3):493-506. PubMed ID: 29444625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Further investigation of the validity and reliability of the photographic figure rating scale for body image assessment.
    Swami V; Stieger S; Harris AS; Nader IW; Pietschnig J; Voracek M; Tovée MJ
    J Pers Assess; 2012; 94(4):404-9. PubMed ID: 22375603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Conceptualizing Interprofessional Teams as Multi-Team Systems-Implications for Assessment and Training.
    West C; Landry K; Graham A; Graham L; Cianciolo AT; Kalet A; Rosen M; Sherman DW
    Teach Learn Med; 2015; 27(4):366-9. PubMed ID: 26507993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An interrater and intrarater reliability study of 3 photographic scales for the classification of perioral aesthetic features.
    Cohen JL; Thomas J; Paradkar D; Rotunda A; Walker PS; Beddingfield FC; Philip A; Davis PG; Yalamanchili R
    Dermatol Surg; 2014 Jun; 40(6):663-70. PubMed ID: 24852471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Initial evidence of the reliability and validity of a three-dimensional body rating scale for the congenitally blind.
    Morgado FF; Ferreira ME; Campana AN; Rigby AS; Tavares Mda C
    Percept Mot Skills; 2013 Feb; 116(1):91-105. PubMed ID: 23829137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. BMI-based body size guides for women and men: development and validation of a novel pictorial method to assess weight-related concepts.
    Harris CV; Bradlyn AS; Coffman J; Gunel E; Cottrell L
    Int J Obes (Lond); 2008 Feb; 32(2):336-42. PubMed ID: 17700580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Body dissatisfaction assessed by the Photographic Figure Rating Scale is associated with sociocultural, personality, and media influences.
    Swami V; Taylor R; Carvalho C
    Scand J Psychol; 2011 Feb; 52(1):57-63. PubMed ID: 20626706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Multitrait-multimethod investigation of a novel body image measurement technique.
    Rowe DA; McDonald SM; Mahar MT; Raedeke TD
    Res Q Exerc Sport; 2005 Dec; 76(4):407-15. PubMed ID: 16739678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Development of a BMI-Guided Shape Morphing Technique and the Effects of an Individualized Figure Rating Scale on Self-Perception of Body Size.
    Hudson GM; Lu Y; Zhang X; Hahn J; Zabal JE; Latif F; Philbeck J
    Eur J Investig Health Psychol Educ; 2020 Jun; 10(2):579-594. PubMed ID: 34434689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Psychometric Properties of Figure Rating Scales in Children: The Impact of Figure Ordering.
    Zitzmann J; Warschburger P
    J Pers Assess; 2020; 102(2):259-268. PubMed ID: 30239215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Development and validation of a new figural drawing scale for body-image assessment: the BIAS-BD.
    Gardner RM; Jappe LM; Gardner L
    J Clin Psychol; 2009 Jan; 65(1):113-22. PubMed ID: 19051276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Development and psychometric evaluation of the breast size satisfaction scale.
    Pahlevan Sharif S
    Int J Health Care Qual Assur; 2017 Oct; 30(8):717-727. PubMed ID: 28958201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Caregiver burden in relatives of persons with schizophrenia: an overview of measure instruments].
    Reine G; Lancon C; Simeoni MC; Duplan S; Auquier P
    Encephale; 2003; 29(2):137-47. PubMed ID: 14567165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Psychometric properties of the Dresden Body Image Questionnaire: A multiple-group confirmatory factor analysis across sex and age in a Dutch non-clinical sample.
    Scheffers M; van Duijn MAJ; Bosscher RJ; Wiersma D; Schoevers RA; van Busschbach JT
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(7):e0181908. PubMed ID: 28746387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Validity and Reliability of Two Silhouette Scales to Asses the Body Image in Adolescent Students].
    Rueda-Jaimes GE; López PA; Flórez SM; Martínez-Villalba AM
    Rev Colomb Psiquiatr; 2012 Mar; 41(1):101-10. PubMed ID: 26573472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Drawings or 3D models: Do illustration methods matter when assessing perceived body size and body dissatisfaction?
    Sob C; Giacone L; Staub K; Bender N; Siegrist M; Hartmann C
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(12):e0261645. PubMed ID: 34932599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Development and Psychometric Evaluation of the Symptom Intrusiveness Rating Scale Among Individuals Experiencing Pain Associated With Chronic Wounds.
    Monfre JM; Kelechi TJ; Magwood GS; Mueller M
    J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2015; 42(5):474-9. PubMed ID: 26336044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Exploration of body perception and body dissatisfaction in young adults with intellectual disability.
    Eden K; Randle-Phillips C
    Res Dev Disabil; 2017 Dec; 71():88-97. PubMed ID: 29032289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A new visual image rating scale for females: correlations with measures of relative fatness, weight dissatisfaction, and body-esteem.
    Goldberg JP; Bailey SM; Lenart EB; Koff E
    Percept Mot Skills; 1996 Jun; 82(3 Pt 2):1075-84. PubMed ID: 8823874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.