1006 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27837442)
1. Non-calcified ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: comparison of diagnostic accuracy of digital breast tomosynthesis, digital mammography, and ultrasonography.
Su X; Lin Q; Cui C; Xu W; Wei Z; Fei J; Li L
Breast Cancer; 2017 Jul; 24(4):562-570. PubMed ID: 27837442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Ductal carcinoma in situ on digital mammography versus digital breast tomosynthesis: rates and predictors of pathologic upgrade.
Kim G; Mikhael PG; Oseni TO; Bahl M
Eur Radiol; 2020 Nov; 30(11):6089-6098. PubMed ID: 32591884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: A New Diagnostic Method for Mass-Like Lesions in Dense Breasts.
Bian T; Lin Q; Cui C; Li L; Qi C; Fei J; Su X
Breast J; 2016 Sep; 22(5):535-40. PubMed ID: 27296324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Digital breast tomosynthesis and breast ultrasound: Additional roles in dense breasts with category 0 at conventional digital mammography.
Lee WK; Chung J; Cha ES; Lee JE; Kim JH
Eur J Radiol; 2016 Jan; 85(1):291-296. PubMed ID: 26499000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of Abbreviated Breast MRI vs Digital Breast Tomosynthesis for Breast Cancer Detection Among Women With Dense Breasts Undergoing Screening.
Comstock CE; Gatsonis C; Newstead GM; Snyder BS; Gareen IF; Bergin JT; Rahbar H; Sung JS; Jacobs C; Harvey JA; Nicholson MH; Ward RC; Holt J; Prather A; Miller KD; Schnall MD; Kuhl CK
JAMA; 2020 Feb; 323(8):746-756. PubMed ID: 32096852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Accuracy of mammography, digital breast tomosynthesis, ultrasound and MR imaging in preoperative assessment of breast cancer.
Mariscotti G; Houssami N; Durando M; Bergamasco L; Campanino PP; Ruggieri C; Regini E; Luparia A; Bussone R; Sapino A; Fonio P; Gandini G
Anticancer Res; 2014 Mar; 34(3):1219-25. PubMed ID: 24596363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Factors Affecting Breast Cancer Detectability on Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Two-Dimensional Digital Mammography in Patients with Dense Breasts.
Lee SH; Jang MJ; Kim SM; Yun B; Rim J; Chang JM; Kim B; Choi HY
Korean J Radiol; 2019 Jan; 20(1):58-68. PubMed ID: 30627022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Digital breast tomosynthesis versus full-field digital mammography: comparison of the accuracy of lesion measurement and characterization using specimens.
Seo N; Kim HH; Shin HJ; Cha JH; Kim H; Moon JH; Gong G; Ahn SH; Son BH
Acta Radiol; 2014 Jul; 55(6):661-7. PubMed ID: 24005560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Dense Breast Ultrasound Screening After Digital Mammography Versus After Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.
Dibble EH; Singer TM; Jimoh N; Baird GL; Lourenco AP
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2019 Dec; 213(6):1397-1402. PubMed ID: 31553658
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Digital breast tomosynthesis versus full-field digital mammography-Which modality provides more accurate prediction of margin status in specimen radiography?
Amer HA; Schmitzberger F; Ingold-Heppner B; Kussmaul J; El Tohamy MF; Tantawy HI; Hamm B; Makowski M; Fallenberg EM
Eur J Radiol; 2017 Aug; 93():258-264. PubMed ID: 28668424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Breast Density in a Contemporary Cohort of Women With Ductal Carcinoma In Situ (DCIS).
Gooch JC; Chun J; Kaplowitz E; Kurz E; Guth A; Lee J; Schnabel F
Ann Surg Oncol; 2019 Oct; 26(11):3472-3477. PubMed ID: 31147991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Digital breast tomosynthesis plus mammography, magnetic resonance imaging plus mammography and mammography alone: A comparison of diagnostic performance in symptomatic women.
Tang W; Hu FX; Zhu H; Wang QF; Gu YJ; Peng WJ
Clin Hemorheol Microcirc; 2017; 66(2):105-116. PubMed ID: 28211806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Diagnostic Performance of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis for Breast Suspicious Calcifications From Various Populations: A Comparison With Full-field Digital Mammography.
Li J; Zhang H; Jiang H; Guo X; Zhang Y; Qi D; Guan J; Liu Z; Wu E; Luo S
Comput Struct Biotechnol J; 2019; 17():82-89. PubMed ID: 30622686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Additional US or DBT after digital mammography: which one is the best combination?
Elizalde A; Pina L; Etxano J; Slon P; Zalazar R; Caballeros M
Acta Radiol; 2016 Jan; 57(1):13-8. PubMed ID: 25523063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Diagnostic evaluation of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: ultrasonographic, mammographic and histopathologic correlations.
Jin ZQ; Lin MY; Hao WQ; Jiang HT; Zhang L; Hu WH; Zhang M
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2015 Jan; 41(1):47-55. PubMed ID: 25479813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Diagnostic accuracy of mammography, clinical examination, US, and MR imaging in preoperative assessment of breast cancer.
Berg WA; Gutierrez L; NessAiver MS; Carter WB; Bhargavan M; Lewis RS; Ioffe OB
Radiology; 2004 Dec; 233(3):830-49. PubMed ID: 15486214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Breast-specific gamma imaging or ultrasonography as adjunct imaging diagnostics in women with mammographically dense breasts.
Zhang Z; Wang W; Wang X; Yu X; Zhu Y; Zhan H; Chen Z; Li B; Huang J
Eur Radiol; 2020 Nov; 30(11):6062-6071. PubMed ID: 32524221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Long-term Surveillance of Ductal Carcinoma in Situ Detected with Screening Mammography versus US: Factors Associated with Second Breast Cancer.
Choi SH; Choi JS; Han BK; Ko EY; Ko ES; Park KW
Radiology; 2019 Jul; 292(1):37-48. PubMed ID: 31038406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Characterization of breast lesions: comparison of digital breast tomosynthesis and ultrasonography.
Kim SA; Chang JM; Cho N; Yi A; Moon WK
Korean J Radiol; 2015; 16(2):229-38. PubMed ID: 25741187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
