248 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27837626)
1. Prognostic significance of perineural invasion in patients who underwent radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer.
Dell'Atti L
J BUON; 2016; 21(5):1219-1223. PubMed ID: 27837626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prostate biopsy perineural invasion is not independently associated with positive surgical margins following radical retropubic prostatectomy.
Ristau BT; Tomaszewski JJ; Chen YF; Bertolet M; Woldemichael E; Nelson JB
World J Urol; 2015 Sep; 33(9):1269-74. PubMed ID: 25366883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Perineural invasion by prostate cancer on MR/US fusion targeted biopsy is associated with extraprostatic extension and early biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy.
Truong M; Rais-Bahrami S; Nix JW; Messing EM; Miyamoto H; Gordetsky JB
Hum Pathol; 2017 Aug; 66():206-211. PubMed ID: 28705708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prediction of extraprostatic extension of prostate cancer based on needle biopsy findings: perineural invasion lacks significance on multivariate analysis.
Egan AJ; Bostwick DG
Am J Surg Pathol; 1997 Dec; 21(12):1496-500. PubMed ID: 9414194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Predictors of positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy at a single institution: preoperative and pathologic factors, and the impact of surgeon variability and technique on incidence and location.
Lallas CD; Fashola Y; Den RB; Gelpi-Hammerschmidt F; Calvaresi AE; McCue P; Birbe R; Gomella LG; Trabulsi EJ
Can J Urol; 2014 Oct; 21(5):7479-86. PubMed ID: 25347375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Perineural invasion on prostate biopsy does not predict adverse pathological outcome.
Elharram M; Margel D; Finelli A; Trachtenberg J; Evans A; van der Kwast TH; Sweet JM; Fleshner N
Can J Urol; 2012 Dec; 19(6):6567-72. PubMed ID: 23228294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prediction of pathological and oncological outcomes based on extended prostate biopsy results in patients with prostate cancer receiving radical prostatectomy: a single institution study.
Ishizaki F; Hara N; Koike H; Kawaguchi M; Tadokoro A; Takizawa I; Nishiyama T; Takahashi K; Hohenfellner R
Diagn Pathol; 2012 Jun; 7():68. PubMed ID: 22697234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evidence of perineural invasion on prostate biopsy specimen and survival after radical prostatectomy.
DeLancey JO; Wood DP; He C; Montgomery JS; Weizer AZ; Miller DC; Jacobs BL; Montie JE; Hollenbeck BK; Skolarus TA
Urology; 2013 Feb; 81(2):354-7. PubMed ID: 23374801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of perineural invasion in prostate needle biopsy on tumor grade and biochemical recurrence rates after radical prostatectomy.
Celik S; Bozkurt O; Demir O; Gurboga O; Tuna B; Yorukoglu K; Aslan G
Kaohsiung J Med Sci; 2018 Jul; 34(7):385-390. PubMed ID: 30063011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Can perineural invasion detected in prostate needle biopsy specimens predict surgical margin positivity in D'Amico low risk patients?
Haki Yuksel O; Urkmez A; Verit A
Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2016 Jul; 88(2):89-92. PubMed ID: 27377081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Perineural invasion in prostate needle biopsy: Prognostic value on radical prostatectomy and active surveillance.
Ramos N; Macedo A; Rosa J; Carvalho M
Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2020 Dec; 92(4):. PubMed ID: 33348961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Does perineural invasion on prostate biopsy predict adverse prostatectomy outcomes?
Loeb S; Epstein JI; Humphreys EB; Walsh PC
BJU Int; 2010 Jun; 105(11):1510-3. PubMed ID: 19694710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Outcome after radical prostatectomy with a pretreatment prostate biopsy Gleason score of >/=8.
Manoharan M; Bird VG; Kim SS; Civantos F; Soloway MS
BJU Int; 2003 Oct; 92(6):539-44. PubMed ID: 14511029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Factors Affecting Surgical Margin Positivity after Radical Prostatectomy in the Turkish Population: A Multicenter Study of the Urooncology Association.
Çelik S; Aslan G; Sözen S; Özen H; Akdoğan B; Baltaci S; İzol V; Tansuğ Z; Türkeri L;
Urol Int; 2020; 104(9-10):724-730. PubMed ID: 32353851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Single Positive Core Prostate Cancer at Biopsy: Clinicopathological Implications and Risk Factors for Adverse Pathological Outcomes.
Mao Q; Lin Y; Xia D; Wang S; Jiang H
Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2022 Jun; 20(3):e205-e209. PubMed ID: 35027314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Perineural invasion as a predictor of biochemical outcome following radical prostatectomy for select men with clinically localized prostate cancer.
D'Amico AV; Wu Y; Chen MH; Nash M; Renshaw AA; Richie JP
J Urol; 2001 Jan; 165(1):126-9. PubMed ID: 11125380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Tertiary Gleason pattern in radical prostatectomy specimens is associated with worse outcomes than the next higher Gleason score group in localized prostate cancer.
Özsoy M; D'Andrea D; Moschini M; Foerster B; Abufaraj M; Mathieu R; Briganti A; Karakiewicz PI; Roupret M; Seitz C; Czech AK; Susani M; Shariat SF
Urol Oncol; 2018 Apr; 36(4):158.e1-158.e6. PubMed ID: 29288003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Impact of positive surgical margins on prostate-specific antigen failure after radical prostatectomy in adjuvant treatment-naïve patients.
Ploussard G; Agamy MA; Alenda O; Allory Y; Mouracade P; Vordos D; Hoznek A; Abbou CC; de la Taille A; Salomon L
BJU Int; 2011 Jun; 107(11):1748-54. PubMed ID: 20883488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Perineural invasion in prostate cancer biopsies is not associated with higher rates of positive surgical margins.
Cannon GM; Pound CR; Landsittel DP; Bastacky SI; Dhir R; Becich MJ; Nelson JB
Prostate; 2005 Jun; 63(4):336-40. PubMed ID: 15602747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The Role of Prostate-specific Antigen Persistence After Radical Prostatectomy for the Prediction of Clinical Progression and Cancer-specific Mortality in Node-positive Prostate Cancer Patients.
Bianchi L; Nini A; Bianchi M; Gandaglia G; Fossati N; Suardi N; Moschini M; Dell'Oglio P; Schiavina R; Montorsi F; Briganti A
Eur Urol; 2016 Jun; 69(6):1142-8. PubMed ID: 26749093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
