102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2783800)
1. Evaluation of a dual-screen, dual-emulsion mammography system.
Jackson VP; Harrill CD; White SJ; Gillespie KR; Mail JT; Katz BP
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1989 Mar; 152(3):483-6. PubMed ID: 2783800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Diagnostic quality of mammograms obtained with a new low-radiation-dose dual-screen and dual-emulsion film combination.
Wojtasek DA; Teixidor HS; Govoni AF; Gareen IF
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1990 Feb; 154(2):265-70. PubMed ID: 2105011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of two screen-film combinations in contact and magnification mammography: detectability of microcalcifications.
Oestmann JW; Kopans DB; Linetsky L; Hall DA; McCarthy KA; White G; Swann C; Kelley JE; Johnson LL
Radiology; 1988 Sep; 168(3):657-9. PubMed ID: 3406394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Mammographic dual-screen-dual-emulsion-film combination: visibility of simulated microcalcifications and effect on image contrast.
Kimme-Smith C; Bassett LW; Gold RH; Roe D; Orr J
Radiology; 1987 Nov; 165(2):313-8. PubMed ID: 3310091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Mammographic microcalcifications: detection with xerography, screen-film, and digitized film display.
Smathers RL; Bush E; Drace J; Stevens M; Sommer FG; Brown BW; Karras B
Radiology; 1986 Jun; 159(3):673-7. PubMed ID: 3704149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Magnification mammography: a comparison of full-field digital mammography and screen-film mammography for the detection of simulated small masses and microcalcifications.
Hermann KP; Obenauer S; Funke M; Grabbe EH
Eur Radiol; 2002 Sep; 12(9):2188-91. PubMed ID: 12195468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Computed radiography versus screen-film mammography in detection of simulated microcalcifications: a receiver operating characteristic study based on phantom images.
Shaw CC; Wang T; King JL; Breitenstein DS; Chang TS; Harris KM; Baratz AB; Ganott MA; Reginella R; Sumkin JH; Gur D
Acad Radiol; 1998 Mar; 5(3):173-80. PubMed ID: 9522883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Storage phosphor direct magnification mammography in comparison with conventional screen-film mammography--a phantom study.
Funke M; Breiter N; Hermann KP; Oestmann JW; Grabbe E
Br J Radiol; 1998 May; 71(845):528-34. PubMed ID: 9691898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Mammographic detectability of breast microcalcifications.
Sickles EA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1982 Nov; 139(5):913-8. PubMed ID: 6981974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A clinical comparison between conventional and digital mammography utilizing computed radiography.
Brettle DS; Ward SC; Parkin GJ; Cowen AR; Sumsion HJ
Br J Radiol; 1994 May; 67(797):464-8. PubMed ID: 8193893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Detection of microcalcifications by mammography with intensifying screens].
Gurvic AM; Katomina RW; Petrowa JJu ; Rozkova NJ; Angerstein W; Wolf M
Radiol Diagn (Berl); 1983; 24(3):409-18. PubMed ID: 6611911
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Physical evaluation of computed radiography as a mammographic X-ray imaging system.
Workman A; Cowen AR; Brettle DS
Br J Radiol; 1994 Oct; 67(802):988-96. PubMed ID: 8000844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Controlled single-blind clinical evaluation of low-dose mammographic screen--film systems.
Sickles EA; Genant HK
Radiology; 1979 Feb; 130(2):347-51. PubMed ID: 760148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [The stationary grid in mammography: its clinical evaluation].
Draghi F; Ferrozzi G; Ferrozzi F; Ferranti C
Radiol Med; 1993; 85(1-2):96-102. PubMed ID: 8480057
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Detection of subtle microcalcifications: comparison of computed radiography and screen-film mammography.
Higashida Y; Moribe N; Morita K; Katsuda N; Hatemura M; Takada T; Takahashi M; Yamashita J
Radiology; 1992 May; 183(2):483-6. PubMed ID: 1561354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Considerations on direct magnification in radiology].
San Nicolò M; Moroder E
Radiol Med; 1986; 72(7-8):579-83. PubMed ID: 3737993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Image quality and breast dose of 24 screen-film combinations for mammography.
Dimakopoulou AD; Tsalafoutas IA; Georgiou EK; Yakoumakis EN
Br J Radiol; 2006 Feb; 79(938):123-9. PubMed ID: 16489193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of breast masses using digitized images versus screen-film mammography.
Liang Z; Du X; Liu J; Yao X; Yang Y; Li K
Acta Radiol; 2008 Jul; 49(6):618-22. PubMed ID: 18568552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Algorithm for the detection of fine clustered calcifications on film mammograms.
Fam BW; Olson SL; Winter PF; Scholz FJ
Radiology; 1988 Nov; 169(2):333-7. PubMed ID: 3174981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Mammography screen-film selection: individual facility testing technique.
Kimme-Smith C; Bassett L; Gold RH; Parkinson B
Med Phys; 1992; 19(5):1195-9. PubMed ID: 1435598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
