These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27838286)

  • 1. Topological false discovery rates for brain mapping based on signal height.
    Li J; Gahm JK; Shi Y; Toga AW
    Neuroimage; 2018 Feb; 167():478-487. PubMed ID: 27838286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Topological FDR for neuroimaging.
    Chumbley J; Worsley K; Flandin G; Friston K
    Neuroimage; 2010 Feb; 49(4):3057-64. PubMed ID: 19944173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. False discovery rate revisited: FDR and topological inference using Gaussian random fields.
    Chumbley JR; Friston KJ
    Neuroimage; 2009 Jan; 44(1):62-70. PubMed ID: 18603449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cluster-level statistical inference in fMRI datasets: The unexpected behavior of random fields in high dimensions.
    Bansal R; Peterson BS
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Jun; 49():101-115. PubMed ID: 29408478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Analysis of family-wise error rates in statistical parametric mapping using random field theory.
    Flandin G; Friston KJ
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2019 May; 40(7):2052-2054. PubMed ID: 29091338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Peak p-values and false discovery rate inference in neuroimaging.
    Schwartzman A; Telschow F
    Neuroimage; 2019 Aug; 197():402-413. PubMed ID: 31028923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of random-field-theory and false-discovery-rate inference results in the analysis of registered one-dimensional biomechanical datasets.
    Naouma H; Pataky TC
    PeerJ; 2019; 7():e8189. PubMed ID: 31844582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Geometry-derived statistical significance: A probabilistic framework for detecting true positive findings in MRI data.
    Bansal R; Peterson BS
    Brain Behav; 2023 Apr; 13(4):e2865. PubMed ID: 36869597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Enhanced signal detection in neuroimaging by means of regional control of the global false discovery rate.
    Langers DR; Jansen JF; Backes WH
    Neuroimage; 2007 Oct; 38(1):43-56. PubMed ID: 17825583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Statistical testing and power analysis for brain-wide association study.
    Gong W; Wan L; Lu W; Ma L; Cheng F; Cheng W; Grünewald S; Feng J
    Med Image Anal; 2018 Jul; 47():15-30. PubMed ID: 29656107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Corrections for multiple comparisons in voxel-based lesion-symptom mapping.
    Mirman D; Landrigan JF; Kokolis S; Verillo S; Ferrara C; Pustina D
    Neuropsychologia; 2018 Jul; 115():112-123. PubMed ID: 28847712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Estimation of false discovery rates for wavelet-denoised statistical parametric maps.
    Srikanth R; Casanova R; Laurienti PJ; Peiffer AM; Maldjian JA
    Neuroimage; 2006 Oct; 33(1):72-84. PubMed ID: 16919480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Empirical null and false discovery rate analysis in neuroimaging.
    Schwartzman A; Dougherty RF; Lee J; Ghahremani D; Taylor JE
    Neuroimage; 2009 Jan; 44(1):71-82. PubMed ID: 18547821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Rank-invariant resampling based estimation of false discovery rate for analysis of small sample microarray data.
    Jain N; Cho H; O'Connell M; Lee JK
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Jul; 6():187. PubMed ID: 16042779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Controlling the false discovery rate with constraints: the Newman-Keuls test revisited.
    Shaffer JP
    Biom J; 2007 Feb; 49(1):136-43. PubMed ID: 17342955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Transformation Invariant Control of Voxel-Wise False Discovery Rate.
    Li J; Shi Y; Toga AW
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2016 Oct; 35(10):2243-2257. PubMed ID: 27101602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Notip: Non-parametric true discovery proportion control for brain imaging.
    Blain A; Thirion B; Neuvial P
    Neuroimage; 2022 Oct; 260():119492. PubMed ID: 35870698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Control of false discoveries in grouped hypothesis testing for eQTL data.
    Rudra P; Zhou YH; Nobel A; Wright FA
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2024 Apr; 25(1):147. PubMed ID: 38605284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Type I and Type II error concerns in fMRI research: re-balancing the scale.
    Lieberman MD; Cunningham WA
    Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2009 Dec; 4(4):423-8. PubMed ID: 20035017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. ALE meta-analysis: controlling the false discovery rate and performing statistical contrasts.
    Laird AR; Fox PM; Price CJ; Glahn DC; Uecker AM; Lancaster JL; Turkeltaub PE; Kochunov P; Fox PT
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2005 May; 25(1):155-64. PubMed ID: 15846811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.