276 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27838848)
1. Ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging are not interchangeable to assess the Achilles tendon cross-sectional-area.
Kruse A; Stafilidis S; Tilp M
Eur J Appl Physiol; 2017 Jan; 117(1):73-82. PubMed ID: 27838848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Does Magnetic Resonance Imaging Provide Superior Reliability for Achilles and Patellar Tendon Cross-Sectional Area Measurements Compared with Ultrasound Imaging?
Stenroth L; Sefa S; Arokoski J; Töyräs J
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2019 Dec; 45(12):3186-3198. PubMed ID: 31493954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Insufficient accuracy of the ultrasound-based determination of Achilles tendon cross-sectional area.
Bohm S; Mersmann F; Schroll A; Mäkitalo N; Arampatzis A
J Biomech; 2016 Sep; 49(13):2932-2937. PubMed ID: 27498950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Validity and reliability of an ultrasound measurement of the free length of the Achilles tendon.
Barfod KW; Riecke AF; Boesen A; Hansen P; Maier JF; Doessing S; Troelsen A
Dan Med J; 2018 Mar; 65(3):. PubMed ID: 29510804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reliability of a two-probe ultrasound imaging procedure to measure strain in the Achilles tendon.
Molyneux P; Ellis RF; Carroll M
J Foot Ankle Res; 2019; 12():49. PubMed ID: 31548870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Validation of a novel ultrasound measurement of achilles tendon length.
Barfod KW; Riecke AF; Boesen A; Hansen P; Maier JF; Døssing S; Troelsen A
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2015 Nov; 23(11):3398-406. PubMed ID: 25038882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A systematic review of the reliability of diagnostic ultrasound imaging in measuring tendon size: Is the error clinically acceptable?
Mc Auliffe S; Mc Creesh K; Purtill H; O'Sullivan K
Phys Ther Sport; 2017 Jul; 26():52-63. PubMed ID: 28162938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Are Ultrasound Measurements of Achilles Tendon Size Reliable? A Systematic Review of Rater Reliability.
Thoirs KA; Childs J
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2018 Dec; 44(12):2476-2491. PubMed ID: 30154035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Validity and reliability of a novel 3D ultrasound approach to assess static lengths and the lengthening behavior of the gastrocnemius medialis muscle and the Achilles tendon in vivo.
Habersack A; Zussner T; Thaller S; Tilp M; Svehlik M; Kruse A
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2022 Dec; 30(12):4203-4213. PubMed ID: 35906410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reproducibility of ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging measurements of tendon size.
Brushøj C; Henriksen BM; Albrecht-Beste E; Hölmich P; Larsen K; Bachmann Nielsen M
Acta Radiol; 2006 Nov; 47(9):954-9. PubMed ID: 17077048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Inter-rater, intra-rater, and inter-machine reliability of quantitative ultrasound measurements of the patellar tendon.
Gellhorn AC; Carlson MJ
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2013 May; 39(5):791-6. PubMed ID: 23465140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. B-Mode Ultrasonography Is a Reliable and Valid Alternative to Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Measuring Patellar Tendon Cross-Sectional Area.
Marshall SJ; Hicks KM; Howatson G; Cox L; Thomas K
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2023 Feb; 49(2):578-587. PubMed ID: 36376155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Freehand 3-D Ultrasound Provide Similar Estimates of Free Achilles Tendon Shape and 3-D Geometry.
Devaprakash D; Lloyd DG; Barrett RS; Obst SJ; Kennedy B; Adams KL; Hunter A; Vlahovich N; Pease DL; Pizzolato C
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2019 Nov; 45(11):2898-2905. PubMed ID: 31471069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The influence of ultrasound measurement techniques on the age-related differences in Achilles tendon size.
Tweedell AJ; Ryan ED; Scharville MJ; Rosenberg JG; Sobolewski EJ; Kleinberg CR
Exp Gerontol; 2016 Apr; 76():68-71. PubMed ID: 26827613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Validation of High-Resolution peripheral Quantitative Computed Tomography-Derived Achilles Tendon Properties Against Diagnostic Ultrasound.
Fung HJW; Cheung AM; Mathur S; Szabo E; Wong AKO
J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact; 2022 Jun; 22(2):203-211. PubMed ID: 35642700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Test-retest reliability and the minimal detectable change for achilles tendon length: a panoramic ultrasound assessment.
Ryan ED; Rosenberg JG; Scharville MJ; Sobolewski EJ; Thompson BJ; King GE
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2013 Dec; 39(12):2488-91. PubMed ID: 24063963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Value of quantitative MRI parameters in predicting and evaluating clinical outcome in conservatively treated patients with chronic midportion Achilles tendinopathy: A prospective study.
Tsehaie J; Poot DHJ; Oei EHG; Verhaar JAN; de Vos RJ
J Sci Med Sport; 2017 Jul; 20(7):633-637. PubMed ID: 28169151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reliability of Ultrasound Measurement of Muscle Thickness in Patients with Supraspinatus Tendon Pathology.
Kretić D; Turk T; Rotim T; Šarić G
Acta Clin Croat; 2018 Jun; 57(2):335-341. PubMed ID: 30431728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Reliability of the Copenhagen Achilles length measure (CALM) on patients with an Achilles tendon rupture.
Hansen MS; Kristensen MT; Budolfsen T; Ellegaard K; Hölmich P; Barfod KW
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2020 Jan; 28(1):281-290. PubMed ID: 31432242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Sonographic measurements of the achilles tendon, plantar fascia, and heel fat pad are reliable: A test-retest intra- and intertester study.
Johannsen F; Jensen S; Stallknecht SE; Olsen LO; Magnusson SP
J Clin Ultrasound; 2016 Oct; 44(8):480-6. PubMed ID: 27155081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
