These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27841363)

  • 1. Auditory attentional selection is biased by reward cues.
    Asutay E; Västfjäll D
    Sci Rep; 2016 Nov; 6():36989. PubMed ID: 27841363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Perceptual Competition Promotes Suppression of Reward Salience in Behavioral Selection and Neural Representation.
    Gong M; Jia K; Li S
    J Neurosci; 2017 Jun; 37(26):6242-6252. PubMed ID: 28539425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cross-modal attention influences auditory contrast sensitivity: Decreasing visual load improves auditory thresholds for amplitude- and frequency-modulated sounds.
    Ciaramitaro VM; Chow HM; Eglington LG
    J Vis; 2017 Mar; 17(3):20. PubMed ID: 28355632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Performance-dependent reward hurts performance: The non-monotonic attentional load modulation on task-irrelevant distractor processing.
    He X; Liu W; Qin N; Lyu L; Dong X; Bao M
    Psychophysiology; 2021 Dec; 58(12):e13920. PubMed ID: 34383329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Value-modulated attentional capture is augmented by win-related sensory cues.
    Pearson D; Piao M; Le Pelley ME
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2024 Jan; 77(1):133-143. PubMed ID: 36803153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Tracking the Misallocation and Reallocation of Spatial Attention toward Auditory Stimuli.
    Mandal A; Liesefeld AM; Liesefeld HR
    J Neurosci; 2024 Jul; 44(30):. PubMed ID: 38886058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Attentional capture by alcohol-related stimuli may be activated involuntarily by top-down search goals.
    Brown CRH; Duka T; Forster S
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2018 Jul; 235(7):2087-2099. PubMed ID: 29696310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Previously reward-associated sounds interfere with goal-directed auditory processing.
    Kim AJ; Lee DS; Anderson BA
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2021 Jul; 74(7):1257-1263. PubMed ID: 33438522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Top-down modulation of auditory processing: effects of sound context, musical expertise and attentional focus.
    Tervaniemi M; Kruck S; De Baene W; Schröger E; Alter K; Friederici AD
    Eur J Neurosci; 2009 Oct; 30(8):1636-42. PubMed ID: 19821835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Stimulus-focused attention speeds up auditory processing.
    Folyi T; Fehér B; Horváth J
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2012 May; 84(2):155-63. PubMed ID: 22326595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of distraction on change detection in crowded acoustic scenes.
    Petsas T; Harrison J; Kashino M; Furukawa S; Chait M
    Hear Res; 2016 Nov; 341():179-189. PubMed ID: 27598040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cross-modal perceptual load: the impact of modality and individual differences.
    Sandhu R; Dyson BJ
    Exp Brain Res; 2016 May; 234(5):1279-91. PubMed ID: 26670905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cross-modal integration during value-driven attentional capture.
    Sanz LRD; Vuilleumier P; Bourgeois A
    Neuropsychologia; 2018 Nov; 120():105-112. PubMed ID: 30342964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Attentional capture by Pavlovian reward-signalling distractors in visual search persists when rewards are removed.
    Watson P; Pearson D; Most SB; Theeuwes J; Wiers RW; Le Pelley ME
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(12):e0226284. PubMed ID: 31830126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reward associations and spatial probabilities produce additive effects on attentional selection.
    Stankevich BA; Geng JJ
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2014 Nov; 76(8):2315-25. PubMed ID: 24944105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reward learning and negative emotion during rapid attentional competition.
    Yokoyama T; Padmala S; Pessoa L
    Front Psychol; 2015; 6():269. PubMed ID: 25814971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Enhancement from targets and suppression from cues in fast task-irrelevant perceptual learning.
    Leclercq V; Seitz AR
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2012 Sep; 141(1):31-8. PubMed ID: 22842471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Interaction between value and perceptual salience in value-driven attentional capture.
    Wang L; Yu H; Zhou X
    J Vis; 2013 Mar; 13(3):. PubMed ID: 23479463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. How does reward compete with goal-directed and stimulus-driven shifts of attention?
    Bourgeois A; Neveu R; Bayle DJ; Vuilleumier P
    Cogn Emot; 2017 Jan; 31(1):109-118. PubMed ID: 26403682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Attentional responses to stimuli associated with a reward can occur in the absence of knowledge of their predictive values.
    Leganes-Fonteneau M; Scott R; Duka T
    Behav Brain Res; 2018 Apr; 341():26-36. PubMed ID: 29247750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.