These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27841447)

  • 1. Dependent measure and time constraints modulate the competition between conflicting feature-based and rule-based generalization processes.
    Cobos PL; Gutiérrez-Cobo MJ; Morís J; Luque D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Apr; 43(4):515-527. PubMed ID: 27841447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of concurrent load on feature- and rule-based generalization in human contingency learning.
    Wills AJ; Graham S; Koh Z; McLaren IP; Rolland MD
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2011 Jul; 37(3):308-16. PubMed ID: 21500927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Generalization of feature- and rule-based learning in the categorization of dimensional stimuli: evidence for dual processes under cognitive control.
    Natal SD; McLaren IP; Livesey EJ
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2013 Apr; 39(2):140-51. PubMed ID: 23421398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Feature- versus rule-based generalization in rats, pigeons and humans.
    Maes E; De Filippo G; Inkster AB; Lea SE; De Houwer J; D'Hooge R; Beckers T; Wills AJ
    Anim Cogn; 2015 Nov; 18(6):1267-84. PubMed ID: 26188712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Generalizing linguistic structures under high attention demands.
    Toro JM; Sinnett S; Soto-Faraco S
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Mar; 37(2):493-501. PubMed ID: 21261426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The blocking effect in associative learning involves learned biases in rapid attentional capture.
    Luque D; Vadillo MA; Gutiérrez-Cobo MJ; Le Pelley ME
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 Feb; 71(2):522-544. PubMed ID: 27874321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Perceptual and conceptual priming of cue encoding in task switching.
    Schneider DW
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2016 Jul; 42(7):1112-26. PubMed ID: 26766605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. New phonotactic constraints learned implicitly by producing syllable strings generalize to the production of new syllables.
    Warker JA; Dell GS
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 Nov; 41(6):1902-10. PubMed ID: 26030628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Discrimination and generalization along a simple dimension: peak shift and rule-governed responding.
    Livesey EJ; McLaren IP
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2009 Oct; 35(4):554-65. PubMed ID: 19839707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Summation in causal learning: elemental processing or configural generalization?
    Collins DJ; Shanks DR
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2006 Sep; 59(9):1524-34. PubMed ID: 16873106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Aging and the role of attention in associative learning.
    Mutter SA; Holder JM; Mashburn CA; Luna CM
    Psychol Aging; 2019 Mar; 34(2):215-227. PubMed ID: 30058825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Associative repetition priming as a measure of human contingency learning: evidence of forward and backward blocking.
    Morís J; Cobos PL; Luque D; López FJ
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2014 Feb; 143(1):77-93. PubMed ID: 23230993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Peak shift and rules in human generalization.
    Lee JC; Hayes BK; Lovibond PF
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 Dec; 44(12):1955-1970. PubMed ID: 29553769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Relative salience versus relative validity: cue salience influences blocking in human associative learning.
    Le Pelley ME; Beesley T; Griffiths O
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2014 Jan; 40(1):116-32. PubMed ID: 24099508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. When seeing a dog activates the bark: multisensory generalization and distinctiveness effects.
    Brunel L; Goldstone RL; Vallet G; Riou B; Versace R
    Exp Psychol; 2013; 60(2):100-12. PubMed ID: 23047916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Neural Correlates of Similarity- and Rule-based Generalization.
    Milton F; Bealing P; Carpenter KL; Bennattayallah A; Wills AJ
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2017 Jan; 29(1):150-166. PubMed ID: 27575389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cue-based preparation and stimulus-based priming of tasks in task switching.
    Koch I; Allport A
    Mem Cognit; 2006 Mar; 34(2):433-44. PubMed ID: 16752606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Generalization decrement and not overshadowing by associative competition among pairs of landmarks in a navigation task.
    Chamizo VD; Rodríguez CA; Espinet A; Mackintosh NJ
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2012 Jul; 38(3):255-65. PubMed ID: 22823419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Outcome value influences attentional biases in human associative learning: dissociable effects of training and instruction.
    Le Pelley ME; Mitchell CJ; Johnson AM
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2013 Jan; 39(1):39-55. PubMed ID: 23316975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The impact of previously learned feature-relevance on generalisation of conditioned fear in humans.
    Ahmed O; Lovibond PF
    J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry; 2015 Mar; 46():59-65. PubMed ID: 25233359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.