These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

232 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27841797)

  • 1. Evaluation of Functional Visual Acuity in Glaucoma Patients.
    Ozeki N; Yuki K; Shiba D; Tsubota K
    J Glaucoma; 2017 Mar; 26(3):223-226. PubMed ID: 27841797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Relationship between foveal threshold and visual acuity using the Humphrey visual field analyzer.
    Flaxel CJ; Samples JR; Dustin L
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2007 May; 143(5):875-7. PubMed ID: 17452176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Analysis of progressive change in automated visual fields in glaucoma.
    Smith SD; Katz J; Quigley HA
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1996 Jun; 37(7):1419-28. PubMed ID: 8641844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Flicker-defined form perimetry in glaucoma patients.
    Horn FK; Kremers J; Mardin CY; Jünemann AG; Adler W; Tornow RP
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2015 Mar; 253(3):447-55. PubMed ID: 25511293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Flicker defined form perimetry in glaucoma suspects with normal achromatic visual fields.
    Reznicek L; Lamparter J; Vogel M; Kampik A; Hirneiß C
    Curr Eye Res; 2015 Jul; 40(7):683-9. PubMed ID: 25207744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Factors associated with vision-related quality of life in Brazilian patients with glaucoma.
    Machado LF; Kawamuro M; Portela RC; Fares NT; Bergamo V; Souza LM; Paranhos A; Prata TS; Gracitelli CPB
    Arq Bras Oftalmol; 2019; 82(6):463-470. PubMed ID: 31482967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. M&S Smart System Contrast Sensitivity Measurements Compared With Standard Visual Function Measurements in Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma Patients.
    Liu JL; McAnany JJ; Wilensky JT; Aref AA; Vajaranant TS
    J Glaucoma; 2017 Jun; 26(6):528-533. PubMed ID: 28333894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of cataract extraction on the results of automated perimetry in glaucoma.
    Smith SD; Katz J; Quigley HA
    Arch Ophthalmol; 1997 Dec; 115(12):1515-9. PubMed ID: 9400784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The relationship between better-eye and integrated visual field mean deviation and visual disability.
    Arora KS; Boland MV; Friedman DS; Jefferys JL; West SK; Ramulu PY
    Ophthalmology; 2013 Dec; 120(12):2476-2484. PubMed ID: 23993358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Diffuse field loss and central visual function in glaucoma.
    Lachenmayr BJ; Drance SM
    Ger J Ophthalmol; 1992; 1(2):67-73. PubMed ID: 1477628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Central 10-degree visual field change following non-penetrating deep sclerectomy in severe and end-stage glaucoma: preliminary results.
    Leleu I; Penaud B; Blumen-Ohana E; Rodallec T; Adam R; Laplace O; Akesbi J; Nordmann JP
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2018 Aug; 256(8):1489-1498. PubMed ID: 29862428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Diffuse glaucomatous structural and functional damage in the hemifield without significant pattern loss.
    Grewal DS; Sehi M; Greenfield DS
    Arch Ophthalmol; 2009 Nov; 127(11):1442-8. PubMed ID: 19901209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Vision-related Quality of Life in Glaucoma Suspect or Early Glaucoma Patients.
    Alqudah A; Mansberger SL; Gardiner SK; Demirel S
    J Glaucoma; 2016 Aug; 25(8):629-33. PubMed ID: 27483331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of contrast sensitivity, visual acuity, and Humphrey visual field testing in patients with glaucoma.
    Wilensky JT; Hawkins A
    Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc; 2001; 99():213-7; discussion 217-8. PubMed ID: 11797309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Association between scanning laser polarimetry measurements using variable corneal polarization compensation and visual field sensitivity in glaucomatous eyes.
    Bowd C; Zangwill LM; Weinreb RN
    Arch Ophthalmol; 2003 Jul; 121(7):961-6. PubMed ID: 12860798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Automated perimetry in amblyopia: a generalized depression.
    Donahue SP; Wall M; Kutzko KE; Kardon RH
    Am J Ophthalmol; 1999 Mar; 127(3):312-21. PubMed ID: 10088742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of pseudophakia on standard perimetry parameters.
    Mutlu FM; Akay F; Bayer A
    Curr Eye Res; 2009 Sep; 34(9):711-6. PubMed ID: 19839864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Detection of early visual impairment in patients with epiretinal membrane.
    Nishi Y; Shinoda H; Uchida A; Koto T; Mochimaru H; Nagai N; Tsubota K; Ozawa Y
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2013 Aug; 91(5):e353-7. PubMed ID: 23387556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of contrast sensitivity, visual acuity, and Humphrey visual field testing in patients with glaucoma.
    Hawkins AS; Szlyk JP; Ardickas Z; Alexander KR; Wilensky JT
    J Glaucoma; 2003 Apr; 12(2):134-8. PubMed ID: 12671468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Patients have two eyes!: binocular versus better eye visual field indices.
    Asaoka R; Crabb DP; Yamashita T; Russell RA; Wang YX; Garway-Heath DF
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2011 Sep; 52(9):7007-11. PubMed ID: 21810985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.