BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

267 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27841799)

  • 1. A Retrospective Cohort Study Comparing the Safety and Efficacy of Minimally Invasive Versus Open Surgical Techniques in the Treatment of Spinal Metastases.
    Hikata T; Isogai N; Shiono Y; Funao H; Okada E; Fujita N; Iwanami A; Watanabe K; Tsuji T; Nakamura M; Matsumoto M; Ishii K
    Clin Spine Surg; 2017 Oct; 30(8):E1082-E1087. PubMed ID: 27841799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of minimally invasive surgery with standard open surgery for vertebral thoracic metastases causing acute myelopathy in patients with short- or mid-term life expectancy: surgical technique and early clinical results.
    Miscusi M; Polli FM; Forcato S; Ricciardi L; Frati A; Cimatti M; De Martino L; Ramieri A; Raco A
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 May; 22(5):518-25. PubMed ID: 25723122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison between minimally invasive spine stabilization with and without posterior decompression for the management of spinal metastases: a retrospective cohort study.
    Uei H; Tokuhashi Y; Maseda M; Nakahashi M; Sawada H; Nakayama E; Soma H
    J Orthop Surg Res; 2018 Apr; 13(1):87. PubMed ID: 29661205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Metastatic Spine Tumor Surgery: A Comparative Study of Minimally Invasive Approach Using Percutaneous Pedicle Screws Fixation Versus Open Approach.
    Kumar N; Malhotra R; Maharajan K; Zaw AS; Wu PH; Makandura MC; Po Liu GK; Thambiah J; Wong HK
    Clin Spine Surg; 2017 Oct; 30(8):E1015-E1021. PubMed ID: 27352374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Minimally Invasive Muscle Sparing Posterior-Only Approach for Lumbar Circumferential Decompression and Stabilization to Treat Spine Metastasis--Technical Report.
    Donnelly DJ; Abd-El-Barr MM; Lu Y
    World Neurosurg; 2015 Nov; 84(5):1484-90. PubMed ID: 26100166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cervical vertebroplasty for osteolytic metastases as a minimally invasive therapeutic option in oncological surgery: outcome in 14 cases.
    Stangenberg M; Viezens L; Eicker SO; Mohme M; Mende KC; Dreimann M
    Neurosurg Focus; 2017 Aug; 43(2):E3. PubMed ID: 28760030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Posterior thoracic corpectomy with cage reconstruction for metastatic spinal tumors: comparing the mini-open approach to the open approach.
    Lau D; Chou D
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Aug; 23(2):217-27. PubMed ID: 25932599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Clinical Results of Minimally Invasive Spine Stabilization for the Management of Metastatic Spinal Tumors Based on the Epidural Spinal Cord Compression Scale.
    Uei H; Tokuhashi Y; Maseda M; Nakahashi M; Sawada H; Matsumoto K; Miyakata H; Soma H
    Biomed Res Int; 2018; 2018():1258706. PubMed ID: 30533425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A Comparative Study Between Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery and Traditional Open Surgery for Patients With Spinal Metastasis.
    Zhu X; Lu J; Xu H; Tang Q; Song G; Deng C; Wu H; Xu Y; Chen H; Wang J
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2021 Jan; 46(1):62-68. PubMed ID: 32925689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Postoperative quality-of-life assessment in patients with spine metastases treated with long-segment pedicle-screw fixation.
    Bernard F; Lemée JM; Lucas O; Menei P
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Jun; 26(6):725-735. PubMed ID: 28338450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clinical Results of Minimally Invasive Spine Stabilization for Spinal Metastases.
    Uei H; Tokuhashi Y; Oshima M; Maseda M; Matsumoto K; Soma H; Nakayama E; Tachikawa Y
    Orthopedics; 2017 Jul; 40(4):e693-e698. PubMed ID: 28558111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of open and minimally invasive surgery for intradural-extramedullary spine tumors.
    Wong AP; Lall RR; Dahdaleh NS; Lawton CD; Smith ZA; Wong RH; Harvey MJ; Lam S; Koski TR; Fessler RG
    Neurosurg Focus; 2015 Aug; 39(2):E11. PubMed ID: 26235009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Minimally invasive approaches in metastatic spinal tumor surgery.
    Dalbayrak S; Yaman O; Ozer AF
    Turk Neurosurg; 2015; 25(3):357-61. PubMed ID: 26037174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Minimally invasive decompression and stabilization for the management of thoracolumbar spine metastasis.
    Zairi F; Arikat A; Allaoui M; Marinho P; Assaker R
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2012 Jul; 17(1):19-23. PubMed ID: 22607222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of one-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion performed with a minimally invasive approach or a traditional open approach.
    Park Y; Ha JW
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Mar; 32(5):537-43. PubMed ID: 17334287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Computer-assisted Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion May Be Better Than Open Surgery for Treating Degenerative Lumbar Disease.
    Tian W; Xu YF; Liu B; Liu YJ; He D; Yuan Q; Lang Z; Han XG
    Clin Spine Surg; 2017 Jul; 30(6):237-242. PubMed ID: 28632545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Minimally invasive approach for the resection of spinal neoplasm.
    Haji FA; Cenic A; Crevier L; Murty N; Reddy K
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Jul; 36(15):E1018-26. PubMed ID: 21304428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of radiographic results after minimally invasive, hybrid, and open surgery for adult spinal deformity: a multicenter study of 184 patients.
    Haque RM; Mundis GM; Ahmed Y; El Ahmadieh TY; Wang MY; Mummaneni PV; Uribe JS; Okonkwo DO; Eastlack RK; Anand N; Kanter AS; La Marca F; Akbarnia BA; Park P; Lafage V; Terran JS; Shaffrey CI; Klineberg E; Deviren V; Fessler RG;
    Neurosurg Focus; 2014 May; 36(5):E13. PubMed ID: 24785478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Spontaneous Pyogenic Spondylodiscitis in the Thoracic or Lumbar Spine: A Retrospective Cohort Study Comparing the Safety and Efficacy of Minimally Invasive and Open Surgery Over a Nine-Year Period.
    Viezens L; Schaefer C; Helmers R; Vettorazzi E; Schroeder M; Hansen-Algenstaedt N
    World Neurosurg; 2017 Jun; 102():18-27. PubMed ID: 28286275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Minimally invasive percutaneous fixation techniques for metastatic spinal disease.
    Rao PJ; Thayaparan GK; Fairhall JM; Mobbs RJ
    Orthop Surg; 2014 Aug; 6(3):187-95. PubMed ID: 25179352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.