159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27842244)
1. An experimental bioactive dental ceramic for metal-ceramic restorations: Textural characteristics and investigation of the mechanical properties.
Goudouri OM; Kontonasaki E; Papadopoulou L; Manda M; Kavouras P; Triantafyllidis KS; Stefanidou M; Koidis P; Paraskevopoulos KM
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2017 Feb; 66():95-103. PubMed ID: 27842244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Mechanical fatigue degradation of ceramics versus resin composites for dental restorations.
Belli R; Geinzer E; Muschweck A; Petschelt A; Lohbauer U
Dent Mater; 2014 Apr; 30(4):424-32. PubMed ID: 24553249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effect of hydrofluoric acid surface treatment and bond strength of a zirconia veneering ceramic.
Chaiyabutr Y; McGowan S; Phillips KM; Kois JC; Giordano RA
J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Sep; 100(3):194-202. PubMed ID: 18762031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of interface characterization and adhesion of glass ceramics to commercially pure titanium and gold alloy after thermal- and mechanical-loading.
Vásquez VZ; Ozcan M; Kimpara ET
Dent Mater; 2009 Feb; 25(2):221-31. PubMed ID: 18718654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The effect of core material, veneering porcelain, and fabrication technique on the biaxial flexural strength and weibull analysis of selected dental ceramics.
Lin WS; Ercoli C; Feng C; Morton D
J Prosthodont; 2012 Jul; 21(5):353-62. PubMed ID: 22462639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The effect of ceramic and porous fillers on the mechanical properties of experimental dental composites.
Zandinejad AA; Atai M; Pahlevan A
Dent Mater; 2006 Apr; 22(4):382-7. PubMed ID: 16055180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Influence of hydrofluoric acid concentration on the flexural strength of a feldspathic ceramic.
Venturini AB; Prochnow C; May LG; Bottino MC; Felipe Valandro L
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2015 Aug; 48():241-248. PubMed ID: 25966909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of mechanical properties of three machinable ceramics with an experimental fluorophlogopite glass ceramic.
Leung BT; Tsoi JK; Matinlinna JP; Pow EH
J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Sep; 114(3):440-6. PubMed ID: 26013069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Characterization of the bioactive and mechanical behavior of dental ceramic/sol-gel derived bioactive glass mixtures.
Abbasi Z; Bahrololoum ME; Bagheri R; Shariat MH
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2016 Feb; 54():115-22. PubMed ID: 26454135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The development and testing of glaze materials for application to the fit surface of dental ceramic restorations.
Cattell MJ; Chadwick TC; Knowles JC; Clarke RL
Dent Mater; 2009 Apr; 25(4):431-41. PubMed ID: 19004493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Microstructural characterization and comparative evaluation of physical, mechanical and biological properties of three ceramics for metal-ceramic restorations.
Kontonasaki E; Kantiranis N; Papadopoulou L; Chatzistavrou X; Kavouras P; Zorba T; Sivropoulou A; Chrissafis K; Paraskevopoulos KM; Koidis PT
Dent Mater; 2008 Oct; 24(10):1362-73. PubMed ID: 18420263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of surface roughness on flexural strength of veneer ceramics.
Fischer H; Schäfer M; Marx R
J Dent Res; 2003 Dec; 82(12):972-5. PubMed ID: 14630897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Opaque layer firing temperature and aging effect on the flexural strength of ceramic fused to cobalt-chromium alloy.
de Vasconcellos LG; Buso L; Lombardo GH; Souza RO; Nogueira L; Bottino MA; Ozcan M
J Prosthodont; 2010 Aug; 19(6):471-7. PubMed ID: 20456032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Fatigue strength of several dental ceramics indicated for CAD-CAM monolithic restorations.
Nishioka G; Prochnow C; Firmino A; Amaral M; Bottino MA; Valandro LF; Renata Marques de M
Braz Oral Res; 2018 Jun; 32():e53. PubMed ID: 29898029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Flexural strength of veneering ceramics for zirconia.
Fischer J; Stawarczyk B; Hämmerle CH
J Dent; 2008 May; 36(5):316-21. PubMed ID: 18339469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Flexural strength and the probability of failure of cold isostatic pressed zirconia core ceramics.
Siarampi E; Kontonasaki E; Papadopoulou L; Kantiranis N; Zorba T; Paraskevopoulos KM; Koidis P
J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Aug; 108(2):84-95. PubMed ID: 22867805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of mechanical cycling on the flexural strength of densely sintered ceramics.
Itinoche KM; Ozcan M; Bottino MA; Oyafuso D
Dent Mater; 2006 Nov; 22(11):1029-34. PubMed ID: 16631923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of bond strength of a pressed ceramic fused to metal versus feldspathic porcelain fused to metal.
Schweitzer DM; Goldstein GR; Ricci JL; Silva NR; Hittelman EL
J Prosthodont; 2005 Dec; 14(4):239-47. PubMed ID: 16359480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of the micro-mechanical and bioactive properties of bioactive glass-dental porcelain composite.
Beketova A; Varitis S; Kontonasaki E; Zorba T; Papadopoulou L; Kantiranis N; Theodorou GS; Paraskevopoulos KM; Koidis P
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2018 Oct; 86():77-83. PubMed ID: 29957447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of porcelain bond strength of different metal frameworks prepared by using conventional and recently introduced fabrication methods.
Kaleli N; Saraç D
J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Jul; 118(1):76-82. PubMed ID: 28343670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
