973 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27842494)
1. SNooPer: a machine learning-based method for somatic variant identification from low-pass next-generation sequencing.
Spinella JF; Mehanna P; Vidal R; Saillour V; Cassart P; Richer C; Ouimet M; Healy J; Sinnett D
BMC Genomics; 2016 Nov; 17(1):912. PubMed ID: 27842494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Machine learning random forest for predicting oncosomatic variant NGS analysis.
Pellegrino E; Jacques C; Beaufils N; Nanni I; Carlioz A; Metellus P; Ouafik L
Sci Rep; 2021 Nov; 11(1):21820. PubMed ID: 34750410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. SNVSniffer: an integrated caller for germline and somatic single-nucleotide and indel mutations.
Liu Y; Loewer M; Aluru S; Schmidt B
BMC Syst Biol; 2016 Aug; 10 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):47. PubMed ID: 27489955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of Nine Somatic Variant Callers for Detection of Somatic Mutations in Exome and Targeted Deep Sequencing Data.
Krøigård AB; Thomassen M; Lænkholm AV; Kruse TA; Larsen MJ
PLoS One; 2016; 11(3):e0151664. PubMed ID: 27002637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. SeqMule: automated pipeline for analysis of human exome/genome sequencing data.
Guo Y; Ding X; Shen Y; Lyon GJ; Wang K
Sci Rep; 2015 Sep; 5():14283. PubMed ID: 26381817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. An analytical workflow for accurate variant discovery in highly divergent regions.
Tian S; Yan H; Neuhauser C; Slager SL
BMC Genomics; 2016 Sep; 17(1):703. PubMed ID: 27590916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A machine learning model to determine the accuracy of variant calls in capture-based next generation sequencing.
van den Akker J; Mishne G; Zimmer AD; Zhou AY
BMC Genomics; 2018 Apr; 19(1):263. PubMed ID: 29665779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. SomaticCombiner: improving the performance of somatic variant calling based on evaluation tests and a consensus approach.
Wang M; Luo W; Jones K; Bian X; Williams R; Higson H; Wu D; Hicks B; Yeager M; Zhu B
Sci Rep; 2020 Jul; 10(1):12898. PubMed ID: 32732891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Accuracy and reproducibility of somatic point mutation calling in clinical-type targeted sequencing data.
Karimnezhad A; Palidwor GA; Thavorn K; Stewart DJ; Campbell PA; Lo B; Perkins TJ
BMC Med Genomics; 2020 Oct; 13(1):156. PubMed ID: 33059707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. CoVaCS: a consensus variant calling system.
Chiara M; Gioiosa S; Chillemi G; D'Antonio M; Flati T; Picardi E; Zambelli F; Horner DS; Pesole G; Castrignanò T
BMC Genomics; 2018 Feb; 19(1):120. PubMed ID: 29402227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Using genotype array data to compare multi- and single-sample variant calls and improve variant call sets from deep coverage whole-genome sequencing data.
Shringarpure SS; Mathias RA; Hernandez RD; O'Connor TD; Szpiech ZA; Torres R; De La Vega FM; Bustamante CD; Barnes KC; Taub MA;
Bioinformatics; 2017 Apr; 33(8):1147-1153. PubMed ID: 28035032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. INDELseek: detection of complex insertions and deletions from next-generation sequencing data.
Au CH; Leung AY; Kwong A; Chan TL; Ma ES
BMC Genomics; 2017 Jan; 18(1):16. PubMed ID: 28056804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Variant callers for next-generation sequencing data: a comparison study.
Liu X; Han S; Wang Z; Gelernter J; Yang BZ
PLoS One; 2013; 8(9):e75619. PubMed ID: 24086590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Impact of post-alignment processing in variant discovery from whole exome data.
Tian S; Yan H; Kalmbach M; Slager SL
BMC Bioinformatics; 2016 Oct; 17(1):403. PubMed ID: 27716037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Variant Calling From Next Generation Sequence Data.
Hansen NF
Methods Mol Biol; 2016; 1418():209-24. PubMed ID: 27008017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluating the performance of low-frequency variant calling tools for the detection of variants from short-read deep sequencing data.
Xiang X; Lu B; Song D; Li J; Shu K; Pu D
Sci Rep; 2023 Nov; 13(1):20444. PubMed ID: 37993475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Detailed simulation of cancer exome sequencing data reveals differences and common limitations of variant callers.
Hofmann AL; Behr J; Singer J; Kuipers J; Beisel C; Schraml P; Moch H; Beerenwinkel N
BMC Bioinformatics; 2017 Jan; 18(1):8. PubMed ID: 28049408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Accurately identifying low-allelic fraction variants in single samples with next-generation sequencing: applications in tumor subclone resolution.
Stead LF; Sutton KM; Taylor GR; Quirke P; Rabbitts P
Hum Mutat; 2013 Oct; 34(10):1432-8. PubMed ID: 23766071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Somatic and Germline Variant Calling from Next-Generation Sequencing Data.
Chang TC; Xu K; Cheng Z; Wu G
Adv Exp Med Biol; 2022; 1361():37-54. PubMed ID: 35230682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. RDscan: A New Method for Improving Germline and Somatic Variant Calling Based on Read Depth Distribution.
Lee S; Hong S; Woo J; Lee JH; Kim K; Kim L; Park K; Jung J
J Comput Biol; 2022 Sep; 29(9):987-1000. PubMed ID: 35749140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
