642 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27842676)
1. Biparametric 3T Magnetic Resonance Imaging for prostatic cancer detection in a biopsy-naïve patient population: a further improvement of PI-RADS v2?
Stanzione A; Imbriaco M; Cocozza S; Fusco F; Rusconi G; Nappi C; Mirone V; Mangiapia F; Brunetti A; Ragozzino A; Longo N
Eur J Radiol; 2016 Dec; 85(12):2269-2274. PubMed ID: 27842676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Abbreviated Biparametric Prostate MR Imaging in Men with Elevated Prostate-specific Antigen.
Kuhl CK; Bruhn R; Krämer N; Nebelung S; Heidenreich A; Schrading S
Radiology; 2017 Nov; 285(2):493-505. PubMed ID: 28727544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Diagnostic accuracy of biparametric vs multiparametric MRI in clinically significant prostate cancer: Comparison between readers with different experience.
Di Campli E; Delli Pizzi A; Seccia B; Cianci R; d'Annibale M; Colasante A; Cinalli S; Castellan P; Navarra R; Iantorno R; Gabrielli D; Buffone A; Caulo M; Basilico R
Eur J Radiol; 2018 Apr; 101():17-23. PubMed ID: 29571792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. High Diagnostic Performance of Short Magnetic Resonance Imaging Protocols for Prostate Cancer Detection in Biopsy-naïve Men: The Next Step in Magnetic Resonance Imaging Accessibility.
van der Leest M; Israël B; Cornel EB; Zámecnik P; Schoots IG; van der Lelij H; Padhani AR; Rovers M; van Oort I; Sedelaar M; Hulsbergen-van de Kaa C; Hannink G; Veltman J; Barentsz J
Eur Urol; 2019 Nov; 76(5):574-581. PubMed ID: 31167748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Analysis of histological findings obtained combining US/mp-MRI fusion-guided biopsies with systematic US biopsies: mp-MRI role in prostate cancer detection and false negative.
Faiella E; Santucci D; Greco F; Frauenfelder G; Giacobbe V; Muto G; Zobel BB; Grasso RF
Radiol Med; 2018 Feb; 123(2):143-152. PubMed ID: 29019021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. T2- and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging at 3T for the detection of prostate cancer with and without endorectal coil: An intraindividual comparison of image quality and diagnostic performance.
Baur AD; Daqqaq T; Wagner M; Maxeiner A; Huppertz A; Renz D; Hamm B; Fischer T; Durmus T
Eur J Radiol; 2016 Jun; 85(6):1075-84. PubMed ID: 27161055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prospective nonrandomized study of diagnostic accuracy comparing prostate cancer detection by transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy to magnetic resonance imaging with subsequent MRI-guided biopsy in biopsy-naïve patients.
Castellucci R; Linares Quevedo AI; Sánchez Gómez FJ; Díez Rodríguez J; Cogorno L; Cogollos Acuña I; Salmerón Béliz I; Muñoz Fernández de Legaría M; Martínez Piñeiro L
Minerva Urol Nefrol; 2017 Dec; 69(6):589-595. PubMed ID: 29094851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prospective comparison of a fast 1.5-T biparametric with the 3.0-T multiparametric ESUR magnetic resonance imaging protocol as a triage test for men at risk of prostate cancer.
Van Nieuwenhove S; Saussez TP; Thiry S; Trefois P; Annet L; Michoux N; Lecouvet F; Tombal B
BJU Int; 2019 Mar; 123(3):411-420. PubMed ID: 30240059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical Application of Biparametric MRI Texture Analysis for Detection and Evaluation of High-Grade Prostate Cancer in Zone-Specific Regions.
Niu XK; Chen ZF; Chen L; Li J; Peng T; Li X
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Mar; 210(3):549-556. PubMed ID: 29220213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Biparametric Quantitative MRI for Prostate Cancer Detection.
Uyanik M; Vigneswaran HT; Hale GR; Gann P; Magin R; Abern MR
Top Magn Reson Imaging; 2023 Dec; 32(6):66-72. PubMed ID: 38051029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Central zone lesions on magnetic resonance imaging: Should we be concerned?
Tan WP; Mazzone A; Shors S; Antoine N; Ekbal S; Khare N; McKiel C; Pessis D; Deane L
Urol Oncol; 2017 Jan; 35(1):31.e7-31.e12. PubMed ID: 27692837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prostate Cancer Detection with Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 1 versus Version 2.
Feng ZY; Wang L; Min XD; Wang SG; Wang GP; Cai J
Chin Med J (Engl); 2016 Oct; 129(20):2451-2459. PubMed ID: 27748338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of PI-RADS version 2 and PI-RADS version 2.1 for the detection of transition zone prostate cancer.
Tamada T; Kido A; Takeuchi M; Yamamoto A; Miyaji Y; Kanomata N; Sone T
Eur J Radiol; 2019 Dec; 121():108704. PubMed ID: 31669798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Multiparametric MRI in detection and staging of prostate cancer.
Boesen L
Dan Med J; 2017 Feb; 64(2):. PubMed ID: 28157066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of clinically significant prostate cancer using biparametric magnetic resonance imaging: An evolving concept.
Mahajan M; Gupta V; Gupta P; Sharma P; Abrol D
J Cancer Res Ther; 2022; 18(6):1640-1645. PubMed ID: 36412424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prospective comparison of PI-RADS version 2 and qualitative in-house categorization system in detection of prostate cancer.
Gaur S; Harmon S; Mehralivand S; Bednarova S; Calio BP; Sugano D; Sidana A; Merino MJ; Pinto PA; Wood BJ; Shih JH; Choyke PL; Turkbey B
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Nov; 48(5):1326-1335. PubMed ID: 29603833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Combined Clinical Parameters and Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Advanced Risk Modeling of Prostate Cancer-Patient-tailored Risk Stratification Can Reduce Unnecessary Biopsies.
Radtke JP; Wiesenfarth M; Kesch C; Freitag MT; Alt CD; Celik K; Distler F; Roth W; Wieczorek K; Stock C; Duensing S; Roethke MC; Teber D; Schlemmer HP; Hohenfellner M; Bonekamp D; Hadaschik BA
Eur Urol; 2017 Dec; 72(6):888-896. PubMed ID: 28400169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Assessment of the Diagnostic Accuracy of Biparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Prostate Cancer in Biopsy-Naive Men: The Biparametric MRI for Detection of Prostate Cancer (BIDOC) Study.
Boesen L; Nørgaard N; Løgager V; Balslev I; Bisbjerg R; Thestrup KC; Winther MD; Jakobsen H; Thomsen HS
JAMA Netw Open; 2018 Jun; 1(2):e180219. PubMed ID: 30646066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prospective Evaluation of the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2 for Prostate Cancer Detection.
Mertan FV; Greer MD; Shih JH; George AK; Kongnyuy M; Muthigi A; Merino MJ; Wood BJ; Pinto PA; Choyke PL; Turkbey B
J Urol; 2016 Sep; 196(3):690-6. PubMed ID: 27101772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging has limited added value over T2-weighted imaging and diffusion-weighted imaging when using PI-RADSv2 for diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer in patients with elevated PSA.
De Visschere P; Lumen N; Ost P; Decaestecker K; Pattyn E; Villeirs G
Clin Radiol; 2017 Jan; 72(1):23-32. PubMed ID: 27726850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
