163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27842702)
1. Normality: Part descriptive, part prescriptive.
Bear A; Knobe J
Cognition; 2017 Oct; 167():25-37. PubMed ID: 27842702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. It's not what you did, it's what you could have done.
Bernhard RM; LeBaron H; Phillips J
Cognition; 2022 Nov; 228():105222. PubMed ID: 35834864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Immoral Professors and Malfunctioning Tools: Counterfactual Relevance Accounts Explain the Effect of Norm Violations on Causal Selection.
Kominsky JF; Phillips J
Cogn Sci; 2019 Nov; 43(11):e12792. PubMed ID: 31742757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Normality and actual causal strength.
Icard TF; Kominsky JF; Knobe J
Cognition; 2017 Apr; 161():80-93. PubMed ID: 28157584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. How prescriptive norms influence causal inferences.
Samland J; Waldmann MR
Cognition; 2016 Nov; 156():164-176. PubMed ID: 27591550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Can only one person be right? The development of objectivism and social preferences regarding widely shared and controversial moral beliefs.
Heiphetz L; Young LL
Cognition; 2017 Oct; 167():78-90. PubMed ID: 27260661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Social norm perception in groups with outliers.
Dannals JE; Miller DT
J Exp Psychol Gen; 2017 Sep; 146(9):1342-1359. PubMed ID: 28682092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Moral Learning: Conceptual foundations and normative relevance.
Railton P
Cognition; 2017 Oct; 167():172-190. PubMed ID: 27601269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The pervasive impact of ignorance.
Kirfel L; Phillips J
Cognition; 2023 Feb; 231():105316. PubMed ID: 36402085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Unifying morality's influence on non-moral judgments: The relevance of alternative possibilities.
Phillips J; Luguri JB; Knobe J
Cognition; 2015 Dec; 145():30-42. PubMed ID: 26298424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The role of causality in judgment under uncertainty.
Krynski TR; Tenenbaum JB
J Exp Psychol Gen; 2007 Aug; 136(3):430-50. PubMed ID: 17696692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. So It Is, So It Shall Be: Group Regularities License Children's Prescriptive Judgments.
Roberts SO; Gelman SA; Ho AK
Cogn Sci; 2017 Apr; 41 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):576-600. PubMed ID: 27914116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The intuitive conceptualization and perception of variance.
Konovalova E; Pachur T
Cognition; 2021 Dec; 217():104906. PubMed ID: 34583131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Inference from explanation.
Kirfel L; Icard T; Gerstenberg T
J Exp Psychol Gen; 2022 Jul; 151(7):1481-1501. PubMed ID: 34928680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Moral learning as intuitive theory revision.
Rhodes M; Wellman H
Cognition; 2017 Oct; 167():191-200. PubMed ID: 27613004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Beliefs About the Causal Structure of the Self-Concept Determine Which Changes Disrupt Personal Identity.
Chen SY; Urminsky O; Bartels DM
Psychol Sci; 2016 Oct; 27(10):1398-1406. PubMed ID: 27528465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Combining feature norms and text data with topic models.
Steyvers M
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Mar; 133(3):234-43. PubMed ID: 19948335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Action trees and moral judgment.
Knobe J
Top Cogn Sci; 2010 Jul; 2(3):555-78. PubMed ID: 25163876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. What Do People Find Incompatible With Causal Determinism?
Bear A; Knobe J
Cogn Sci; 2016 Nov; 40(8):2025-2049. PubMed ID: 26489702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Discrepancies between young people's self-reported sexual experience and their perceptions of 'normality'.
Lim MS; Aitken CK; Hocking JS; Hellard ME
Sex Health; 2009 Jun; 6(2):171-2. PubMed ID: 19457298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
