1508 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27842997)
1. Cryopreserved oocyte versus fresh oocyte assisted reproductive technology cycles, United States, 2013.
Crawford S; Boulet SL; Kawwass JF; Jamieson DJ; Kissin DM
Fertil Steril; 2017 Jan; 107(1):110-118. PubMed ID: 27842997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Pregnancy rates in donor oocyte cycles compared to similar autologous in vitro fertilization cycles: an analysis of 26,457 fresh cycles from the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology.
Yeh JS; Steward RG; Dude AM; Shah AA; Goldfarb JM; Muasher SJ
Fertil Steril; 2014 Aug; 102(2):399-404. PubMed ID: 24842672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Successful elective and medically indicated oocyte vitrification and warming for autologous in vitro fertilization, with predicted birth probabilities for fertility preservation according to number of cryopreserved oocytes and age at retrieval.
Doyle JO; Richter KS; Lim J; Stillman RJ; Graham JR; Tucker MJ
Fertil Steril; 2016 Feb; 105(2):459-66.e2. PubMed ID: 26604065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Association of Fresh Embryo Transfers Compared With Cryopreserved-Thawed Embryo Transfers With Live Birth Rate Among Women Undergoing Assisted Reproduction Using Freshly Retrieved Donor Oocytes.
Insogna IG; Lanes A; Lee MS; Ginsburg ES; Fox JH
JAMA; 2021 Jan; 325(2):156-163. PubMed ID: 33433574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Patient and cycle characteristics predicting high pregnancy rates with single-embryo transfer: an analysis of the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology outcomes between 2004 and 2013.
Mersereau J; Stanhiser J; Coddington C; Jones T; Luke B; Brown MB
Fertil Steril; 2017 Nov; 108(5):750-756. PubMed ID: 28923285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prognostic indicators of assisted reproduction technology outcomes of cycles with ultralow serum antimüllerian hormone: a multivariate analysis of over 5,000 autologous cycles from the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcome Reporting System database for 2012-2013.
Seifer DB; Tal O; Wantman E; Edul P; Baker VL
Fertil Steril; 2016 Feb; 105(2):385-93.e3. PubMed ID: 26515380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Freeze-all, oocyte vitrification, or fresh embryo transfer? Lessons from an egg-sharing donation program.
Braga DP; Setti AS; Figueira RC; Azevedo Mde C; Iaconelli A; Lo Turco EG; Borges E
Fertil Steril; 2016 Sep; 106(3):615-22. PubMed ID: 27262501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cumulative live birth rates after one ART cycle including all subsequent frozen-thaw cycles in 1050 women: secondary outcome of an RCT comparing GnRH-antagonist and GnRH-agonist protocols.
Toftager M; Bogstad J; Løssl K; Prætorius L; Zedeler A; Bryndorf T; Nilas L; Pinborg A
Hum Reprod; 2017 Mar; 32(3):556-567. PubMed ID: 28130435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Differential impact of controlled ovarian hyperstimulation on live birth rate in fresh versus frozen embryo transfer cycles: a Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcome System study.
Gerber RS; Fazzari M; Kappy M; Cohen A; Galperin S; Lieman H; Jindal S; Buyuk E
Fertil Steril; 2020 Dec; 114(6):1225-1231. PubMed ID: 33012553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Difference in birth weight of consecutive sibling singletons is not found in oocyte donation when comparing fresh versus frozen embryo replacements.
Galliano D; Garrido N; Serra-Serra V; Pellicer A
Fertil Steril; 2015 Dec; 104(6):1411-8.e1-3. PubMed ID: 26363384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Factors associated with the use of elective single-embryo transfer and pregnancy outcomes in the United States, 2004-2012.
Styer AK; Luke B; Vitek W; Christianson MS; Baker VL; Christy AY; Polotsky AJ
Fertil Steril; 2016 Jul; 106(1):80-89. PubMed ID: 26997248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Trends and outcomes of gestational surrogacy in the United States.
Perkins KM; Boulet SL; Jamieson DJ; Kissin DM;
Fertil Steril; 2016 Aug; 106(2):435-442.e2. PubMed ID: 27087401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Fresh embryo transfer after in vitro insemination of fresh vs. cryopreserved anonymous donor oocytes: which has a better live birth rate? A Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcome Reporting System analysis.
Whynott RM; Summers KM; Ball GD; Van Voorhis BJ; Sparks A
Fertil Steril; 2022 Apr; 117(4):803-810. PubMed ID: 35216830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical outcomes following cryopreservation of blastocysts by vitrification or slow freezing: a population-based cohort study.
Li Z; Wang YA; Ledger W; Edgar DH; Sullivan EA
Hum Reprod; 2014 Dec; 29(12):2794-801. PubMed ID: 25316444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Extremities of body mass index and their association with pregnancy outcomes in women undergoing in vitro fertilization in the United States.
Kawwass JF; Kulkarni AD; Hipp HS; Crawford S; Kissin DM; Jamieson DJ
Fertil Steril; 2016 Dec; 106(7):1742-1750. PubMed ID: 27666564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Reproductive outcomes of familial oocyte donation.
Hasson J; Tulandi T; Son WY; Al Ma'mari N; Badeghiesh A; Tannus S; Takefman J; Shavit T
Fertil Steril; 2016 Dec; 106(7):1696-1702. PubMed ID: 27678040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Efficacy and safety of frozen-thawed embryo transfer in women aged 35 to 42 years from the PURSUE randomized clinical trial.
Boostanfar R; Gates D; Guan Y; Gordon K; McCrary Sisk C; Stegmann BJ
Fertil Steril; 2016 Aug; 106(2):300-305.e5. PubMed ID: 27090863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Antimüllerian hormone as a predictor of live birth following assisted reproduction: an analysis of 85,062 fresh and thawed cycles from the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcome Reporting System database for 2012-2013.
Tal R; Seifer DB; Wantman E; Baker V; Tal O
Fertil Steril; 2018 Feb; 109(2):258-265. PubMed ID: 29331235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Contrasting patterns in in vitro fertilization pregnancy rates among fresh autologous, fresh oocyte donor, and cryopreserved cycles with the use of day 5 or day 6 blastocysts may reflect differences in embryo-endometrium synchrony.
Shapiro BS; Daneshmand ST; Garner FC; Aguirre M; Ross R
Fertil Steril; 2008 Jan; 89(1):20-6. PubMed ID: 17224151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Preimplantation genetic screening: who benefits?
Kang HJ; Melnick AP; Stewart JD; Xu K; Rosenwaks Z
Fertil Steril; 2016 Sep; 106(3):597-602. PubMed ID: 27143516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
