These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27844055)

  • 1. A Bayesian Account of Visual-Vestibular Interactions in the Rod-and-Frame Task.
    Alberts BB; de Brouwer AJ; Selen LP; Medendorp WP
    eNeuro; 2016; 3(5):. PubMed ID: 27844055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bayesian quantification of sensory reweighting in a familial bilateral vestibular disorder (DFNA9).
    Alberts BBGT; Selen LPJ; Verhagen WIM; Pennings RJE; Medendorp WP
    J Neurophysiol; 2018 Mar; 119(3):1209-1221. PubMed ID: 29357473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Panoramic Uncertainty in Vertical Perception.
    Stapel JC; Medendorp WP
    Front Integr Neurosci; 2021; 15():738768. PubMed ID: 34867226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Age-related reweighting of visual and vestibular cues for vertical perception.
    Alberts BBGT; Selen LPJ; Medendorp WP
    J Neurophysiol; 2019 Apr; 121(4):1279-1288. PubMed ID: 30699005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Which way is down? Visual and tactile verticality perception in expert dancers and non-experts.
    Beck B; Saramandi A; Ferrè ER; Haggard P
    Neuropsychologia; 2020 Sep; 146():107546. PubMed ID: 32610097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Gravity dependence of the effect of optokinetic stimulation on the subjective visual vertical.
    Ward BK; Bockisch CJ; Caramia N; Bertolini G; Tarnutzer AA
    J Neurophysiol; 2017 May; 117(5):1948-1958. PubMed ID: 28148642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Contributions of optostatic and optokinetic cues to the perception of vertical.
    Niehof N; Perdreau F; Koppen M; Medendorp WP
    J Neurophysiol; 2019 Aug; 122(2):480-489. PubMed ID: 31166820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dissociating vestibular and somatosensory contributions to spatial orientation.
    Alberts BB; Selen LP; Bertolini G; Straumann D; Medendorp WP; Tarnutzer AA
    J Neurophysiol; 2016 Jul; 116(1):30-40. PubMed ID: 27075537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Visual orientation uncertainty in the rod-and-frame illusion.
    Pomante A; Selen LPJ; Medendorp WP
    J Vis; 2019 Apr; 19(4):19. PubMed ID: 30998829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Altered visual and haptic verticality perception in posterior cortical atrophy and Alzheimer's disease.
    Day BL; Ocal D; Peters A; Bancroft MJ; Cash D; Kaski D; Crutch SJ; Yong KXX
    J Physiol; 2022 Jan; 600(2):373-391. PubMed ID: 34841531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Perception of the dynamic visual vertical during sinusoidal linear motion.
    Pomante A; Selen LPJ; Medendorp WP
    J Neurophysiol; 2017 Oct; 118(4):2499-2506. PubMed ID: 28814635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Fusion of visual and vestibular tilt cues in the perception of visual vertical.
    Vingerhoets RA; De Vrijer M; Van Gisbergen JA; Medendorp WP
    J Neurophysiol; 2009 Mar; 101(3):1321-33. PubMed ID: 19118112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dissociation between subjective vertical and subjective body orientation elicited by galvanic vestibular stimulation.
    Mars F; Vercher JL; Popov K
    Brain Res Bull; 2005 Feb; 65(1):77-86. PubMed ID: 15680547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Does gravity influence the visual line bisection task?
    Drakul A; Bockisch CJ; Tarnutzer AA
    J Neurophysiol; 2016 Aug; 116(2):629-36. PubMed ID: 27226452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Gravity estimation and verticality perception.
    Dakin CJ; Rosenberg A
    Handb Clin Neurol; 2018; 159():43-59. PubMed ID: 30482332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Neural processing of gravito-inertial cues in humans. IV. Influence of visual rotational cues during roll optokinetic stimuli.
    Zupan LH; Merfeld DM
    J Neurophysiol; 2003 Jan; 89(1):390-400. PubMed ID: 12522188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessment of verticality perception by a rod-and-frame test: preliminary observations on the use of a computer monitor and video eye glasses.
    Bagust J
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2005 May; 86(5):1062-4. PubMed ID: 15895360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Precision and accuracy of the subjective haptic vertical in the roll plane.
    Schuler JR; Bockisch CJ; Straumann D; Tarnutzer AA
    BMC Neurosci; 2010 Jul; 11():83. PubMed ID: 20630097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Perception of the vertical with a head-mounted visual frame during head tilt.
    Mars F; Vercher JL; Blouin J
    Ergonomics; 2004 Aug; 47(10):1116-30. PubMed ID: 15370867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Visual context modulates the subjective vertical in neglect: evidence for an increased rod-and-frame-effect.
    Funk J; Finke K; Müller HJ; Utz KS; Kerkhoff G
    Neuroscience; 2011 Jan; 173():124-34. PubMed ID: 21073929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.