These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27844217)

  • 1. Assessing Inaccuracies in Automated Information Extraction of Breast Imaging Findings.
    Lacson R; Goodrich ME; Harris K; Brawarsky P; Haas JS
    J Digit Imaging; 2017 Apr; 30(2):228-233. PubMed ID: 27844217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of an Automated Information Extraction Tool for Imaging Data Elements to Populate a Breast Cancer Screening Registry.
    Lacson R; Harris K; Brawarsky P; Tosteson TD; Onega T; Tosteson AN; Kaye A; Gonzalez I; Birdwell R; Haas JS
    J Digit Imaging; 2015 Oct; 28(5):567-75. PubMed ID: 25561069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Automated extraction of BI-RADS final assessment categories from radiology reports with natural language processing.
    Sippo DA; Warden GI; Andriole KP; Lacson R; Ikuta I; Birdwell RL; Khorasani R
    J Digit Imaging; 2013 Oct; 26(5):989-94. PubMed ID: 23868515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Automatic extraction of imaging observation and assessment categories from breast magnetic resonance imaging reports with natural language processing.
    Liu Y; Zhu LN; Liu Q; Han C; Zhang XD; Wang XY
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2019 Jul; 132(14):1673-1680. PubMed ID: 31268905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. BI-RADS
    Spak DA; Plaxco JS; Santiago L; Dryden MJ; Dogan BE
    Diagn Interv Imaging; 2017 Mar; 98(3):179-190. PubMed ID: 28131457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The implementation of natural language processing to extract index lesions from breast magnetic resonance imaging reports.
    Liu Y; Liu Q; Han C; Zhang X; Wang X
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2019 Dec; 19(1):288. PubMed ID: 31888615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Automated annotation and classification of BI-RADS assessment from radiology reports.
    Castro SM; Tseytlin E; Medvedeva O; Mitchell K; Visweswaran S; Bekhuis T; Jacobson RS
    J Biomed Inform; 2017 May; 69():177-187. PubMed ID: 28428140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessment of BI-RADS category 4 lesions detected with screening mammography and screening US: utility of MR imaging.
    Strobel K; Schrading S; Hansen NL; Barabasch A; Kuhl CK
    Radiology; 2015 Feb; 274(2):343-51. PubMed ID: 25271857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Automated Radiology-Pathology Module Correlation Using a Novel Report Matching Algorithm by Organ System.
    Dane B; Doshi A; Gfytopoulos S; Bhattacharji P; Recht M; Moore W
    Acad Radiol; 2018 May; 25(5):673-680. PubMed ID: 29373209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Using automatically extracted information from mammography reports for decision-support.
    Bozkurt S; Gimenez F; Burnside ES; Gulkesen KH; Rubin DL
    J Biomed Inform; 2016 Aug; 62():224-31. PubMed ID: 27388877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A Pictorial Review of Changes in the BI-RADS Fifth Edition.
    Rao AA; Feneis J; Lalonde C; Ojeda-Fournier H
    Radiographics; 2016; 36(3):623-39. PubMed ID: 27082663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Use of BI-RADS to interpret magnetic resonance mammography for breast cancer].
    Kharuzhyk SA; Shimanets SV; Karman AV; Shapoval EV
    Vestn Rentgenol Radiol; 2014; (4):46-59. PubMed ID: 25775888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Automatic abstraction of imaging observations with their characteristics from mammography reports.
    Bozkurt S; Lipson JA; Senol U; Rubin DL
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2015 Apr; 22(e1):e81-92. PubMed ID: 25352567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mammography, US, and MRI for Preoperative Prediction of Extensive Intraductal Component of Invasive Breast Cancer: Interobserver Variability and Performances.
    Kim HR; Jung HK; Ko KH; Kim SJ; Lee KS
    Clin Breast Cancer; 2016 Aug; 16(4):305-11. PubMed ID: 27025667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Maximum intensity breast diffusion MRI for BI-RADS 4 lesions detected on X-ray mammography.
    Bickelhaupt S; Paech D; Laun FB; Steudle F; Kuder TA; Mlynarska A; Bach M; Lederer W; Teiner S; Schneider S; Ladd ME; Daniel H; Stieber A; Kopp-Schneider A; Delorme S; Schlemmer HP
    Clin Radiol; 2017 Oct; 72(10):900.e1-900.e8. PubMed ID: 28687167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. "I'm Just Guessing These Answers!" An Evaluation of the (In)Accuracy of Patient-Reported Medical History Collected as Part of a Breast Imaging Program.
    Chung S; Rosewall T; Menezes R; Kalliomäki T
    J Med Imaging Radiat Sci; 2018 Dec; 49(4):390-396. PubMed ID: 30514556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Automatic information extraction from unstructured mammography reports using distributed semantics.
    Gupta A; Banerjee I; Rubin DL
    J Biomed Inform; 2018 Feb; 78():78-86. PubMed ID: 29329701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The challenge of imaging dense breast parenchyma: is magnetic resonance mammography the technique of choice? A comparative study with x-ray mammography and whole-breast ultrasound.
    Pediconi F; Catalano C; Roselli A; Dominelli V; Cagioli S; Karatasiou A; Pronio A; Kirchin MA; Passariello R
    Invest Radiol; 2009 Jul; 44(7):412-21. PubMed ID: 19448554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Breast MRI as an adjunct to mammography: Does it really suffer from low specificity? A retrospective analysis stratified by mammographic BI-RADS classes.
    Benndorf M; Baltzer PA; Vag T; Gajda M; Runnebaum IB; Kaiser WA
    Acta Radiol; 2010 Sep; 51(7):715-21. PubMed ID: 20707656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.