These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27845155)

  • 1. Go and no-go P3 with rare and frequent stimuli in oddball tasks: A study comparing key-pressing with counting.
    Verleger R; Grauhan N; Śmigasiewicz K
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2016 Dec; 110():128-136. PubMed ID: 27845155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Is P3 a strategic or a tactical component? Relationships of P3 sub-components to response times in oddball tasks with go, no-go and choice responses.
    Verleger R; Grauhan N; Śmigasiewicz K
    Neuroimage; 2016 Dec; 143():223-234. PubMed ID: 27570107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Modifications of cognitive and motor tasks affect the occurrence of event-related potentials in the human cortex.
    Rektor I; Brázdil M; Nestrasil I; Bares M; Daniel P
    Eur J Neurosci; 2007 Sep; 26(5):1371-80. PubMed ID: 17767513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Testing the stimulus-to-response bridging function of the oddball-P3 by delayed response signals and residue iteration decomposition (RIDE).
    Verleger R; Metzner MF; Ouyang G; Śmigasiewicz K; Zhou C
    Neuroimage; 2014 Oct; 100():271-80. PubMed ID: 24960419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. On the relation of movement-related potentials to the go/no-go effect on P3.
    Verleger R; Paehge T; Kolev V; Yordanova J; Jaśkowski P
    Biol Psychol; 2006 Oct; 73(3):298-313. PubMed ID: 16837117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Movement-related potentials in the Go/NoGo task: the P3 reflects both cognitive and motor inhibition.
    Smith JL; Johnstone SJ; Barry RJ
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2008 Mar; 119(3):704-714. PubMed ID: 18164657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Parafac and go/no-go: disentangling CNV return from the P3 complex by trilinear component analysis.
    Verleger R; Paulick C; Möcks J; Smith JL; Keller K
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Mar; 87(3):289-300. PubMed ID: 22902314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of task decision on P300.
    Acosta VW; Nasman VT
    Int J Psychophysiol; 1992 Jul; 13(1):37-44. PubMed ID: 1522031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Response inhibition or evaluation of danger? An event-related potential study regarding the origin of the motor interference effect from dangerous objects.
    Liu P; Cao R; Chen X; Wang Y
    Brain Res; 2017 Jun; 1664():63-73. PubMed ID: 28365315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Do Rare Stimuli Evoke Large P3s by Being Unexpected? A Comparison of Oddball Effects Between Standard-Oddball and Prediction-Oddball Tasks.
    Verleger R; Śmigasiewicz K
    Adv Cogn Psychol; 2016; 12(2):88-104. PubMed ID: 27512527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Event-related potentials in adolescents with schizophrenia and their siblings: a comparison with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.
    Groom MJ; Bates AT; Jackson GM; Calton TG; Liddle PF; Hollis C
    Biol Psychiatry; 2008 Apr; 63(8):784-92. PubMed ID: 17977520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Diversity of the P3 in the task-switching paradigm.
    Gajewski PD; Falkenstein M
    Brain Res; 2011 Sep; 1411():87-97. PubMed ID: 21803343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Intracerebral somatosensory event-related potentials: effect of response type (button pressing versus mental counting) on P3-like potentials within the human brain.
    Brázdil M; Roman R; Daniel P; Rektor I
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2003 Aug; 114(8):1489-96. PubMed ID: 12888032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects on P3 of spreading targets and response prompts apart.
    Verleger R; Siller B; Ouyang G; Śmigasiewicz K
    Biol Psychol; 2017 May; 126():1-11. PubMed ID: 28366558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. ERP generator patterns in schizophrenia during tonal and phonetic oddball tasks: effects of response hand and silent count.
    Kayser J; Tenke CE; Gil R; Bruder GE
    Clin EEG Neurosci; 2010 Oct; 41(4):184-95. PubMed ID: 21077570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. CNV resolution does not cause NoGo anteriorisation of the P3: a failure to replicate Simson et al.
    Smith JL; Barry RJ; Steiner GZ
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Sep; 89(3):349-57. PubMed ID: 23669175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The influence of age and individual differences in executive function on stimulus processing in the oddball task.
    West R; Schwarb H; Johnson BN
    Cortex; 2010 Apr; 46(4):550-63. PubMed ID: 19720373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Electrocortical measures of performance monitoring from go/no-go and flanker tasks: Differential relations with trait dimensions of the triarchic model of psychopathy.
    Ribes-Guardiola P; Poy R; Patrick CJ; Moltó J
    Psychophysiology; 2020 Jun; 57(6):e13573. PubMed ID: 32237155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The hard oddball: effects of difficult response selection on stimulus-related P3 and on response-related negative potentials.
    Verleger R; Baur N; Metzner MF; Smigasiewicz K
    Psychophysiology; 2014 Nov; 51(11):1089-100. PubMed ID: 24981371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. N2 and P3 modulation during partial inhibition in a modified go/nogo task.
    Nguyen AT; Moyle JJ; Fox AM
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2016 Sep; 107():63-71. PubMed ID: 27394185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.