These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

267 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27845669)

  • 1. Collaborative Completion of Transcription Factor Binding Profiles via Local Sensitive Unified Embedding.
    Zhu L; Guo WL; Lu C; Huang DS
    IEEE Trans Nanobioscience; 2016 Dec; 15(8):946-958. PubMed ID: 27845669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. ChIP-PIT: Enhancing the Analysis of ChIP-Seq Data Using Convex-Relaxed Pair-Wise Interaction Tensor Decomposition.
    Zhu L; Guo WL; Deng SP; Huang DS
    IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2016; 13(1):55-63. PubMed ID: 26886732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. ChIPulate: A comprehensive ChIP-seq simulation pipeline.
    Datta V; Hannenhalli S; Siddharthan R
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2019 Mar; 15(3):e1006921. PubMed ID: 30897079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An efficient method to transcription factor binding sites imputation via simultaneous completion of multiple matrices with positional consistency.
    Guo WL; Huang DS
    Mol Biosyst; 2017 Aug; 13(9):1827-1837. PubMed ID: 28718849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. dPeak: high resolution identification of transcription factor binding sites from PET and SET ChIP-Seq data.
    Chung D; Park D; Myers K; Grass J; Kiley P; Landick R; Keleş S
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2013; 9(10):e1003246. PubMed ID: 24146601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. WSMD: weakly-supervised motif discovery in transcription factor ChIP-seq data.
    Zhang H; Zhu L; Huang DS
    Sci Rep; 2017 Jun; 7(1):3217. PubMed ID: 28607381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Integrative analysis of ChIP-chip and ChIP-seq dataset.
    Zhu LJ
    Methods Mol Biol; 2013; 1067():105-24. PubMed ID: 23975789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Direct ChIP-Seq significance analysis improves target prediction.
    Bansal M; Mendiratta G; Anand S; Kushwaha R; Kim R; Kustagi M; Iyer A; Chaganti RS; Califano A; Sumazin P
    BMC Genomics; 2015; 16 Suppl 5(Suppl 5):S4. PubMed ID: 26040656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. AIControl: replacing matched control experiments with machine learning improves ChIP-seq peak identification.
    Hiranuma N; Lundberg SM; Lee SI
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2019 Jun; 47(10):e58. PubMed ID: 30869146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Epigenetic analysis: ChIP-chip and ChIP-seq.
    Pellegrini M; Ferrari R
    Methods Mol Biol; 2012; 802():377-87. PubMed ID: 22130894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A novel statistical method for quantitative comparison of multiple ChIP-seq datasets.
    Chen L; Wang C; Qin ZS; Wu H
    Bioinformatics; 2015 Jun; 31(12):1889-96. PubMed ID: 25682068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. FisherMP: fully parallel algorithm for detecting combinatorial motifs from large ChIP-seq datasets.
    Zhang S; Liang Y; Wang X; Su Z; Chen Y
    DNA Res; 2019 Jun; 26(3):231-242. PubMed ID: 30957858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Ritornello: high fidelity control-free chromatin immunoprecipitation peak calling.
    Stanton KP; Jin J; Lederman RR; Weissman SM; Kluger Y
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2017 Dec; 45(21):e173. PubMed ID: 28981893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cell-type specificity of ChIP-predicted transcription factor binding sites.
    Håndstad T; Rye M; Močnik R; Drabløs F; Sætrom P
    BMC Genomics; 2012 Aug; 13():372. PubMed ID: 22863112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Improving analysis of transcription factor binding sites within ChIP-Seq data based on topological motif enrichment.
    Worsley Hunt R; Mathelier A; Del Peso L; Wasserman WW
    BMC Genomics; 2014 Jun; 15(1):472. PubMed ID: 24927817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Identification of transcription factor binding sites from ChIP-seq data at high resolution.
    Bardet AF; Steinmann J; Bafna S; Knoblich JA; Zeitlinger J; Stark A
    Bioinformatics; 2013 Nov; 29(21):2705-13. PubMed ID: 23980024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Using combined evidence from replicates to evaluate ChIP-seq peaks.
    Jalili V; Matteucci M; Masseroli M; Morelli MJ
    Bioinformatics; 2015 Sep; 31(17):2761-9. PubMed ID: 25957351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. High resolution models of transcription factor-DNA affinities improve in vitro and in vivo binding predictions.
    Agius P; Arvey A; Chang W; Noble WS; Leslie C
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2010 Sep; 6(9):. PubMed ID: 20838582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Unified Analysis of Multiple ChIP-Seq Datasets.
    Ma G; Babarinde IA; Zhuang Q; Hutchins AP
    Methods Mol Biol; 2021; 2198():451-465. PubMed ID: 32822050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. iASeq: integrative analysis of allele-specificity of protein-DNA interactions in multiple ChIP-seq datasets.
    Wei Y; Li X; Wang QF; Ji H
    BMC Genomics; 2012 Nov; 13():681. PubMed ID: 23194258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.