These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

96 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27846099)

  • 1. Evaluation of Health Information Technology - Key Elements in the Framework.
    Lee TT
    J Nurs Res; 2016 Dec; 24(4):283-285. PubMed ID: 27846099
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. ECRI vice president sees need for transparency, better information.
    Montagnolo AJ
    Biomed Instrum Technol; 2012; 46(6):446-9. PubMed ID: 23171186
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Implementation fidelity: a framework for evaluation in the health information technology field.
    Eisenstein EL; Lobach DF; Montgomery P; Kawamoto K; Anstrom KJ
    AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2007 Oct; ():949. PubMed ID: 18694049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Economic evaluation in medical information technology: why the numbers don't add up.
    Eisenstein EL; Ortiz M; Anstrom KJ; Crosslin DR; Lobach DF
    AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2006; 2006():914. PubMed ID: 17238533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. E-health interventions as complex interventions: improving the quality of methods of assessment.
    Holbrook AM; Thabane L; Shcherbatykh IY; O'Reilly D
    AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2006; 2006():952. PubMed ID: 17238571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. 'CHEATS': a generic information communication technology (ICT) evaluation framework.
    Shaw NT
    Comput Biol Med; 2002 May; 32(3):209-20. PubMed ID: 11922936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Health Information Technology Evaluation Framework (HITREF) Comprehensiveness as Assessed in Electronic Point-of-Care Documentation Systems Evaluations.
    Sockolow PS; Bowles KH; Rogers M
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2015; 216():406-9. PubMed ID: 26262081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessing the quality of medical information technology economic evaluations: room for improvement.
    Eisenstein EL; Ortiz M; Anstrom KJ; Crosslin DR; Lobach DF
    AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2006; 2006():234-8. PubMed ID: 17238338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. How to measure technology assessment: an introduction.
    Hasman A
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2014; 202():1-4. PubMed ID: 25000000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of health information systems-problems and challenges.
    Ammenwerth E; Gräber S; Herrmann G; Bürkle T; König J
    Int J Med Inform; 2003 Sep; 71(2-3):125-35. PubMed ID: 14519405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The aging of a clinical information system.
    Rada R; Finley S
    J Biomed Inform; 2004 Oct; 37(5):319-24. PubMed ID: 15488746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Using Mixed Methods in Health Information Technology Evaluation.
    Sockolow P; Dowding D; Randell R; Favela J
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2016; 225():83-7. PubMed ID: 27332167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Insights and limits of usability evaluation methods along the health information technology lifecycle.
    Marcilly R; Kushniruk AW; Beuscart-Zephir MC; Borycki EM
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2015; 210():115-9. PubMed ID: 25991113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Health care, ethics, and information technologies.
    Curtin L
    Semin Nurse Manag; 2002 Jun; 10(2):130-5. PubMed ID: 12092267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Health informatics and the Hospital Ethics Committee.
    Goodman KW
    MD Comput; 1999; 16(2):17-20. PubMed ID: 10375878
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Information technology: supporting the practice of nurses.
    Slocumb EM
    Fla Nurse; 2005 Mar; 53(1):24. PubMed ID: 15813332
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessment of health information technology: which questions for which systems? Proposal for a taxonomy.
    Grémy F; Degoulet P
    Med Inform (Lond); 1993; 18(3):185-93. PubMed ID: 8289530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Evaluation Imperative.
    Nagle LM
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2016; 225():88-92. PubMed ID: 27332168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A framework for telehealth program evaluation.
    Nepal S; Li J; Jang-Jaccard J; Alem L
    Telemed J E Health; 2014 Apr; 20(4):393-404. PubMed ID: 24621384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The PHM-Ethics methodology: interdisciplinary technology assessment of personal health monitoring.
    Schmidt S; Verweij M
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2013; 187():13-20. PubMed ID: 23920452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.