These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

304 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27846448)

  • 1. Short and long term outcomes of children conceived with assisted reproductive technology.
    Turkgeldi E; Yagmur H; Seyhan A; Urman B; Ata B
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Dec; 207():129-136. PubMed ID: 27846448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assisted reproductive technology and perinatal outcomes: conventional versus discordant-sibling design.
    Dhalwani NN; Boulet SL; Kissin DM; Zhang Y; McKane P; Bailey MA; Hood ME; Tata LJ
    Fertil Steril; 2016 Sep; 106(3):710-716.e2. PubMed ID: 27187051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Natural cycle IVF reduces the risk of low birthweight infants compared with conventional stimulated IVF.
    Mak W; Kondapalli LA; Celia G; Gordon J; DiMattina M; Payson M
    Hum Reprod; 2016 Apr; 31(4):789-94. PubMed ID: 26908846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assisted reproductive technology surveillance--United States, 2009.
    Sunderam S; Kissin DM; Flowers L; Anderson JE; Folger SG; Jamieson DJ; Barfield WD;
    MMWR Surveill Summ; 2012 Nov; 61(7):1-23. PubMed ID: 23114281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Adverse obstetric and perinatal outcomes of singleton pregnancies may be related to maternal factors associated with infertility rather than the type of assisted reproductive technology procedure used.
    Hayashi M; Nakai A; Satoh S; Matsuda Y
    Fertil Steril; 2012 Oct; 98(4):922-8. PubMed ID: 22763098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Follow-up of children conceived by assisted reproductive technologies].
    Bouillon C; Fauque P
    Arch Pediatr; 2013 May; 20(5):575-9. PubMed ID: 23545282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assisted reproductive technology surveillance--United States, 2011.
    Sunderam S; Kissin DM; Crawford SB; Folger SG; Jamieson DJ; Barfield WD;
    MMWR Surveill Summ; 2014 Nov; 63(10):1-28. PubMed ID: 25412164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assisted Reproductive Technology Surveillance — United States, 2012.
    Sunderam S; Kissin DM; Crawford SB; Folger SG; Jamieson DJ; Warner L; Barfield WD;
    MMWR Surveill Summ; 2015 Aug; 64(6):1-29. PubMed ID: 26270152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [The prognosis for children born after assisted reproduction].
    Henningsen AK; Loft A; Malchau SS; Pinborg A
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2012 Oct; 174(41):2462-6. PubMed ID: 23050688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assisted reproductive technology surveillance -- United States, 2010.
    Sunderam S; Kissin DM; Crawford S; Anderson JE; Folger SG; Jamieson DJ; Barfield WD;
    MMWR Surveill Summ; 2013 Dec; 62(9):1-24. PubMed ID: 24304902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Birth and perinatal outcomes and complications for babies conceived following ART.
    Henningsen AK; Pinborg A
    Semin Fetal Neonatal Med; 2014 Aug; 19(4):234-8. PubMed ID: 24840403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The impact of assisted reproductive technologies on intra-uterine growth and birth defects in singletons.
    Hansen M; Bower C
    Semin Fetal Neonatal Med; 2014 Aug; 19(4):228-33. PubMed ID: 24746981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assisted Reproductive Technology Surveillance - 
United States, 2013.
    Sunderam S; Kissin DM; Crawford SB; Folger SG; Jamieson DJ; Warner L; Barfield WD;
    MMWR Surveill Summ; 2015 Dec; 64(11):1-25. PubMed ID: 26633040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Pregnancy and perinatal outcomes after assisted reproduction: a comparative study.
    Allen C; Bowdin S; Harrison RF; Sutcliffe AG; Brueton L; Kirby G; Kirkman-Brown J; Barrett C; Reardon W; Maher E
    Ir J Med Sci; 2008 Sep; 177(3):233-41. PubMed ID: 18521653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The prevalence of major congenital malformations during two periods of time, 1986-1994 and 1995-2002 in newborns conceived by assisted reproduction technology.
    Merlob P; Sapir O; Sulkes J; Fisch B
    Eur J Med Genet; 2005; 48(1):5-11. PubMed ID: 15953400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Perinatal outcome in children born after assisted reproductive technologies.
    Wennerholm UB; Bergh C
    Ups J Med Sci; 2020 May; 125(2):158-166. PubMed ID: 32124667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Birth outcomes of intended pregnancies among women who used assisted reproductive technology, ovulation stimulation, or no treatment.
    D'Angelo DV; Whitehead N; Helms K; Barfield W; Ahluwalia IB
    Fertil Steril; 2011 Aug; 96(2):314-320.e2. PubMed ID: 21718990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Perinatal complications of assisted reproduction.
    Aboulghar MA
    Croat Med J; 2005 Oct; 46(5):751-8. PubMed ID: 16158467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Adverse perinatal events associated with ART.
    Skora D; Frankfurter D
    Semin Reprod Med; 2012 Apr; 30(2):84-91. PubMed ID: 22549708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assisted Reproductive Technology Treatment, the Catalyst to Amplify the Effect of Maternal Infertility on Preterm Birth.
    Zhang Y; Zhou W; Feng W; Hu J; Hu K; Cui L; Chen ZJ
    Front Endocrinol (Lausanne); 2022; 13():791229. PubMed ID: 35721737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.