These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
27. Get a license, buckle up, and slow down: risky driving patterns among saudis. El Bcheraoui C; Basulaiman M; Tuffaha M; Daoud F; Robinson M; Jaber S; Mikhitarian S; Wilson S; Memish ZA; Al Saeedi M; Almazroa MA; Mokdad AH Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16(6):587-92. PubMed ID: 25551701 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The Effect of Secondary Task Engagement on Adolescents' Driving Performance and Crash Risk. Klauer SG; Ehsani JP; McGehee DV; Manser M J Adolesc Health; 2015 Jul; 57(1 Suppl):S36-43. PubMed ID: 26112736 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The relative impact of work-related stress, life stress and driving environment stress on driving outcomes. Rowden P; Matthews G; Watson B; Biggs H Accid Anal Prev; 2011 Jul; 43(4):1332-40. PubMed ID: 21545862 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Secondary Behavior of Drivers on Cell Phones. Farmer CM; Klauer SG; McClafferty JA; Guo F Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16(8):801-8. PubMed ID: 25793432 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Road safety from the perspective of driver gender and age as related to the injury crash frequency and road scenario. Russo F; Biancardo SA; Dell'Acqua G Traffic Inj Prev; 2014; 15(1):25-33. PubMed ID: 24279963 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The on-road experiences and awareness of sleepiness in a sample of Australian highway drivers: A roadside driver sleepiness study. Watling CN; Armstrong KA; Smith SS; Wilson A Traffic Inj Prev; 2016; 17(1):24-30. PubMed ID: 25834934 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. How we can measure the non-driving-task engagement in automated driving: Comparing flow experience and workload. Ko SM; Ji YG Appl Ergon; 2018 Feb; 67():237-245. PubMed ID: 29122195 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The effects of anti-speeding advertisements on the simulated driving behaviour of young drivers. Plant BR; Irwin JD; Chekaluk E Accid Anal Prev; 2017 Mar; 100():65-74. PubMed ID: 28119216 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Protective factors associated with young passenger intervening in risky driving situations. Buckley L; Foss MS J Safety Res; 2012 Dec; 43(5-6):351-6. PubMed ID: 23206507 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The role of self-regulation in the context of driver distraction: A simulator study. Wandtner B; Schumacher M; Schmidt EA Traffic Inj Prev; 2016 Jul; 17(5):472-9. PubMed ID: 27082493 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Young and unlicensed: risky driving before entering the licensing system. Scott-Parker B; Watson B; King MJ; Hyde MK Traffic Inj Prev; 2012; 13(3):213-8. PubMed ID: 22607243 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Identifying beliefs underlying pre-drivers' intentions to take risks: An application of the Theory of Planned Behaviour. Rowe R; Andrews E; Harris PR; Armitage CJ; McKenna FP; Norman P Accid Anal Prev; 2016 Apr; 89():49-56. PubMed ID: 26803598 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Driving behaviours, traffic risk and road safety: comparative study between Malaysia and Singapore. Khan Su; Khalifah ZB; Munir Y; Islam T; Nazir T; Khan H Int J Inj Contr Saf Promot; 2015; 22(4):359-67. PubMed ID: 24974915 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Risk and safety perception on urban and rural roads: Effects of environmental features, driver age and risk sensitivity. Cox JA; Beanland V; Filtness AJ Traffic Inj Prev; 2017 Oct; 18(7):703-710. PubMed ID: 28436735 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]