186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27847266)
1. The dosimetric and radiobiological impact of calculation grid size on head and neck IMRT.
Srivastava SP; Cheng CW; Das IJ
Pract Radiat Oncol; 2017; 7(3):209-217. PubMed ID: 27847266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The effect of slice thickness on target and organs at risk volumes, dosimetric coverage and radiobiological impact in IMRT planning.
Srivastava SP; Cheng CW; Das IJ
Clin Transl Oncol; 2016 May; 18(5):469-79. PubMed ID: 26311077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Dose-volume and radiobiological dependence on the calculation grid size in prostate VMAT planning.
Chow JCL; Jiang R
Med Dosim; 2018 Winter; 43(4):383-389. PubMed ID: 29373184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Impact of grid size on uniform scanning and IMPT plans in XiO treatment planning system for brain cancer.
Rana S; Zheng Y
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 Sep; 16(5):447–456. PubMed ID: 26699310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. On the radiobiological impact of metal artifacts in head-and-neck IMRT in terms of tumor control probability (TCP) and normal tissue complication probability (NTCP).
Kim Y; Tomé WA
Med Biol Eng Comput; 2007 Nov; 45(11):1045-51. PubMed ID: 17574487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Dosimetric comparison between 2-dimensional radiation therapy and intensity modulated radiation therapy in treatment of advanced T-stage nasopharyngeal carcinoma: to treat less or more in the planning organ-at-risk volume of the brainstem and spinal cord.
Chau RM; Teo PM; Kam MK; Leung SF; Cheung KY; Chan AT
Med Dosim; 2007; 32(4):263-70. PubMed ID: 17980826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluating different radiotherapy treatment plans, in terms of critical organ scoring index, conformity index, tumor control probability, and normal tissue complication probability calculations in early glottic larynx carcinoma.
Inal A; Duman E; Ozkan EE
J Cancer Res Ther; 2020; 16(3):485-493. PubMed ID: 32719255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dosimetric and radiobiological comparison in different dose calculation grid sizes between Acuros XB and anisotropic analytical algorithm for prostate VMAT.
Kim KH; Chung JB; Suh TS; Kang SW; Kang SH; Eom KY; Song C; Kim IA; Kim JS
PLoS One; 2018; 13(11):e0207232. PubMed ID: 30419058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Helical tomotherapy for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: dosimetric comparison with linear accelerator-based step-and-shoot IMRT.
Murthy V; Master Z; Gupta T; Ghosh-Laskar S; Budrukkar A; Phurailatpam R; Agarwal J
J Cancer Res Ther; 2010; 6(2):194-8. PubMed ID: 20622367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Novel Radiobiological Gamma Index for Evaluation of 3-Dimensional Predicted Dose Distribution.
Sumida I; Yamaguchi H; Kizaki H; Aboshi K; Tsujii M; Yoshikawa N; Yamada Y; Suzuki O; Seo Y; Isohashi F; Yoshioka Y; Ogawa K
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2015 Jul; 92(4):779-86. PubMed ID: 25936816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparing 3DCRT and inversely optimized IMRT planning for head and neck cancer: equivalence between step-and-shoot and sliding window techniques.
Longobardi B; De Martin E; Fiorino C; Dell'oca I; Broggi S; Cattaneo GM; Calandrino R
Radiother Oncol; 2005 Nov; 77(2):148-56. PubMed ID: 16260056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A split-organ delineation approach for dose optimisation for intensity-modulated radiotherapy for advanced T-stage nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
Chau RM; Leung SF; Kam MK; Cheung KY; Kwan WH; Yu KH; Chiu SK; Chan AT
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol); 2008 Mar; 20(2):134-41. PubMed ID: 18031999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Radiobiological impact of dose calculation algorithms on biologically optimized IMRT lung stereotactic body radiation therapy plans.
Liang X; Penagaricano J; Zheng D; Morrill S; Zhang X; Corry P; Griffin RJ; Han EY; Hardee M; Ratanatharathom V
Radiat Oncol; 2016 Jan; 11():10. PubMed ID: 26800883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Myths, facts and scope of spinal cord tolerance dose revision in Intensity modulated SIB treatment of locally advanced head and neck cancer: A dosimetrical and radiobiological demonstration.
Patel G; Mandal A; Choudhary S; Mishra R; Shahi U; Mishra H
Cancer Radiother; 2021 Feb; 25(1):8-12. PubMed ID: 33293203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Intensity modulated arc therapy implementation in a three phase adaptive (18)F-FDG-PET voxel intensity-based planning strategy for head-and-neck cancer.
Berwouts D; Olteanu LA; Speleers B; Duprez F; Madani I; Vercauteren T; De Neve W; De Gersem W
Radiat Oncol; 2016 Apr; 11():52. PubMed ID: 27039294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessment of the Dosimetric Index from IMRT and Rapid arc Plan for Oropharyngeal Cancer with Simultaneous Integrated Boost (SIB) Technique in Combination with EUD-based NTCP and TCP Radiobiological Models.
Dashnamoorthy S; Jeyasingh E; Rajamanickam K; Ahmed I
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2024 May; 25(5):1515-1528. PubMed ID: 38809623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Dosimetry analysis of intensity-modulated and conformal radiation therapy for head and neck tumors].
Pesznyák C; Béla D; Takácsi-Nagy Z; Major T; Polgár C
Magy Onkol; 2015 Jun; 59(2):95-101. PubMed ID: 26035156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Physical and Radiobiological Evaluation of Accelerated Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy for Locally Advanced Head and Neck Cancer and Comparison with Short-Term Clinical Outcomes.
Buchapudi RR; Manickam R; M R AK; C R TP; Chandraraj V; Pyakuryal A; Narayanasamy G
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2019 Aug; 20(8):2463-2470. PubMed ID: 31450921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Dependence of achievable plan quality on treatment technique and planning goal refinement: a head-and-neck intensity modulated radiation therapy application.
Qi XS; Ruan D; Lee SP; Pham A; Kupelian P; Low DA; Steinberg M; Demarco J
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2015 Mar; 91(4):817-24. PubMed ID: 25752396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Voxel-Level BED Corrected Dosimetric and Radiobiological Assessment of 2 Kinds of Hybrid Radiotherapy Planning Methods for Stage III NSCLC.
Wang H; Huang Y; Chen H; Shao Y; Duan Y; Feng A; Gu H; Ma X; Xu Z; Kong Q; Zhou Y
Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2022; 21():15330338221107966. PubMed ID: 35731648
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
