848 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27847296)
21. Tertiary Gleason pattern 5 is a powerful predictor of biochemical relapse in patients with Gleason score 7 prostatic adenocarcinoma.
Hattab EM; Koch MO; Eble JN; Lin H; Cheng L
J Urol; 2006 May; 175(5):1695-9; discussion 1699. PubMed ID: 16600733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Length of positive surgical margin after radical prostatectomy as a predictor of biochemical recurrence.
Shikanov S; Song J; Royce C; Al-Ahmadie H; Zorn K; Steinberg G; Zagaja G; Shalhav A; Eggener S
J Urol; 2009 Jul; 182(1):139-44. PubMed ID: 19450829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Significance of preoperative butyrylcholinesterase as an independent predictor of biochemical recurrence-free survival in patients with prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy.
Koie T; Ohyama C; Hatakeyama S; Imai A; Yoneyama T; Hashimoto Y; Yoneyama T; Tobisawa Y; Hosogoe S; Yamamoto H; Kitayama M; Hirota K
Int J Clin Oncol; 2016 Apr; 21(2):379-383. PubMed ID: 26223693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. High Gleason grade carcinoma at a positive surgical margin predicts biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy and may guide adjuvant radiotherapy.
Savdie R; Horvath LG; Benito RP; Rasiah KK; Haynes AM; Chatfield M; Stricker PD; Turner JJ; Delprado W; Henshall SM; Sutherland RL; Kench JG
BJU Int; 2012 Jun; 109(12):1794-800. PubMed ID: 21992536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Evaluation of the 2015 Gleason Grade Groups in a Nationwide Population-based Cohort.
Loeb S; Folkvaljon Y; Robinson D; Lissbrant IF; Egevad L; Stattin P
Eur Urol; 2016 Jun; 69(6):1135-41. PubMed ID: 26707871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Prognostic Value of Percent Gleason Grade 4 at Prostate Biopsy in Predicting Prostatectomy Pathology and Recurrence.
Cole AI; Morgan TM; Spratt DE; Palapattu GS; He C; Tomlins SA; Weizer AZ; Feng FY; Wu A; Siddiqui J; Chinnaiyan AM; Montgomery JS; Kunju LP; Miller DC; Hollenbeck BK; Wei JT; Mehra R
J Urol; 2016 Aug; 196(2):405-11. PubMed ID: 26920466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The significance of micro-lymphatic invasion and pathological Gleason score in prostate cancer patients with pathologically organ-confined disease and negative surgical margins after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
Hashimoto T; Nakashima J; Inoue R; Komori O; Yamaguchi Y; Kashima T; Satake N; Nakagami Y; Namiki K; Nagao T; Ohno Y
Int J Clin Oncol; 2020 Feb; 25(2):377-383. PubMed ID: 31673831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. [Existence of pattern 5 on radical prostatectomy: poor prognostic factor associated with a lower biochemical recurrence-free survival].
Pastori J; Balssa L; Lillaz J; Guichard G; Chabannes E; Bernardini S; Bittard H; Thiery-Vuillemin A; Kleinclauss F
Prog Urol; 2014 Jun; 24(7):433-40. PubMed ID: 24861683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The prognostic impact of downgrading and upgrading from biopsy to radical prostatectomy among men with Gleason score 7 prostate cancer.
Jang WS; Koh DH; Kim J; Lee JS; Chung DY; Ham WS; Rha KH; Choi YD
Prostate; 2019 Dec; 79(16):1805-1810. PubMed ID: 31483062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Preoperative Statin Use at the Time of Radical Prostatectomy Is Not Associated With Biochemical Recurrence or Pathologic Upgrading.
Lyon TD; Turner RM; Yabes JG; Woldemichael E; Davies BJ; Jacobs BL; Nelson JB
Urology; 2016 Nov; 97():153-159. PubMed ID: 27516122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Gleason Pattern 5 is a Possible Pathologic Predictor for Biochemical Recurrence after Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy.
Ikeda M; Amano N; Sakata Y; Honda T; Tachibana T; Hirano S; Yamashita H; Ishii J; Irie A
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2019 Mar; 20(3):783-788. PubMed ID: 30909685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Relationship between primary Gleason pattern on needle biopsy and clinicopathologic outcomes among men with Gleason score 7 adenocarcinoma of the prostate.
Gonzalgo ML; Bastian PJ; Mangold LA; Trock BJ; Epstein JI; Walsh PC; Partin AW
Urology; 2006 Jan; 67(1):115-9. PubMed ID: 16413345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. What are the factors associated with short prostate specific antigen doubling time after radical prostatectomy? A report from the SEARCH database group.
Teeter AE; Bañez LL; Presti JC; Aronson WJ; Terris MK; Kane CJ; Amling CL; Freedland SJ;
J Urol; 2008 Nov; 180(5):1980-4; discussion 1985. PubMed ID: 18801519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Percent of prostate needle biopsy cores with cancer is significant independent predictor of prostate specific antigen recurrence following radical prostatectomy: results from SEARCH database.
Freedland SJ; Aronson WJ; Terris MK; Kane CJ; Amling CL; Dorey F; Presti JC;
J Urol; 2003 Jun; 169(6):2136-41. PubMed ID: 12771735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Presence of high grade tertiary Gleason pattern upgrades the Gleason sum score and is inversely associated with biochemical recurrence-free survival.
Turker P; Bas E; Bozkurt S; Günlüsoy B; Sezgin A; Postacı H; Turkeri L
Urol Oncol; 2013 Jan; 31(1):93-8. PubMed ID: 21316989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. PI-RADS Version 2 Category on 3 Tesla Multiparametric Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging Predicts Oncologic Outcomes in Gleason 3 + 4 Prostate Cancer on Biopsy.
Faiena I; Salmasi A; Mendhiratta N; Markovic D; Ahuja P; Hsu W; Elashoff DA; Raman SS; Reiter RE
J Urol; 2019 Jan; 201(1):91-97. PubMed ID: 30142318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Comparison of Biochemical Recurrence-Free Survival after Radical Prostatectomy Triggered by Grade Reclassification during Active Surveillance and in Men Newly Diagnosed with Similar Grade Disease.
Diniz CP; Landis P; Carter HB; Epstein JI; Mamawala M
J Urol; 2017 Sep; 198(3):608-613. PubMed ID: 28347771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Biochemical (prostate specific antigen) recurrence probability following radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer.
Han M; Partin AW; Zahurak M; Piantadosi S; Epstein JI; Walsh PC
J Urol; 2003 Feb; 169(2):517-23. PubMed ID: 12544300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Should we replace the Gleason score with the amount of high-grade prostate cancer?
Vis AN; Roemeling S; Kranse R; Schröder FH; van der Kwast TH
Eur Urol; 2007 Apr; 51(4):931-9. PubMed ID: 16935413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Oncological Outcomes After Radical Prostatectomy for High-Risk Prostate Cancer Based on New Gleason Grouping System: A Validation Study From University of Southern California With 3,755 Cases.
Djaladat H; Amini E; Xu W; Cai J; Daneshmand S; Lieskovsky G
Prostate; 2017 May; 77(7):743-748. PubMed ID: 28144967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
