These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27847515)

  • 1. The AMBU® Aura-i™ Laryngeal Mask and LMA Supreme™: A Randomized Trial of Clinical Performance and Fibreoptic Positioning in Unparalysed, Anaesthetised Patients by Novices.
    Yahaya Z; Teoh WH; Dintan NA; Agrawal R
    Anesthesiol Res Pract; 2016; 2016():4717061. PubMed ID: 27847515
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Pediatric supraglottic airway devices in clinical practice: A prospective observational study.
    Kleine-Brueggeney M; Gottfried A; Nabecker S; Greif R; Book M; Theiler L
    BMC Anesthesiol; 2017 Sep; 17(1):119. PubMed ID: 28865448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Ambu® AuraGain™ versus LMA Supreme™ Second Seal™: a randomised controlled trial comparing oropharyngeal leak pressures and gastric drain functionality in spontaneously breathing patients.
    Shariffuddin II; Teoh WH; Tang E; Hashim N; Loh PS
    Anaesth Intensive Care; 2017 Mar; 45(2):244-250. PubMed ID: 28267947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinical evaluation of Ambu
    Rangaswamy TM; Bharadwaj A; Jain P
    Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci; 2019; 9(4):157-163. PubMed ID: 31879601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Ventilatory performance of AMBU® AuraGain™ and LMA® Supreme™ in laparoscopic surgery: A randomised controlled trial.
    Zhang J; Drakeford PA; Ng V; Seng Z; Chua M; Tan N; Mathew D; Teoh WH
    Anaesth Intensive Care; 2021 Sep; 49(5):395-403. PubMed ID: 34550812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Laryngeal mask airway protector generates higher oropharyngeal leak pressures compared to the laryngeal mask airway supreme: A randomized clinical trial in the ambulatory surgery unit.
    Acx E; Van Caelenberg E; De Baerdemaeker L; Coppens M
    J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol; 2021; 37(2):221-225. PubMed ID: 34349370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of blind intubation with the intubating laryngeal mask FASTRACH™ and the intubating laryngeal mask Ambu Aura-i™ a prospective randomised clinical trial.
    Schiewe R; Stoeck M; Gruenewald M; Hoecker J; Bein B
    BMC Anesthesiol; 2019 Mar; 19(1):44. PubMed ID: 30927922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Ambu® Aura Gain™ versus Ambu® Aura Once™ in children: a randomized, crossover study assessing oropharyngeal leak pressure and fibreoptic position.
    Stögermüller B; Ofner S; Ziegler B; Keller C; Moser B; Gasteiger L
    Can J Anaesth; 2019 Jan; 66(1):57-62. PubMed ID: 30315506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of Fiberoptic-Guided Tracheal Intubation Through Intubating Laryngeal Mask Airway (ILMA) FastrachTM and Ambu® Aura-i™: A Randomized Clinical Study.
    Mishra N; Bharadwaj A
    Cureus; 2020 Sep; 12(9):e10178. PubMed ID: 33029458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A randomized trial comparing the Ambu® Aura-i™ and the Ambu® Aura Gain™ laryngeal mask as conduit for tracheal intubation in children.
    Gasteiger L; Oswald E; Keplinger M; Putzer G; Luger M; Neururer S; Keller C; Moser B
    Minerva Anestesiol; 2020 Nov; 86(11):1143-1150. PubMed ID: 32755086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clinical Performance Comparison of LMA Protector™ Cuff Pilot™ and LMA Supreme™ When Used in Anesthetized, Non-paralyzed Patients.
    Chan WK; Liu CY
    Cureus; 2022 Mar; 14(3):e23176. PubMed ID: 35308185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clinical Assessment of the Ambu® Aura-i™ as an Independent Ventilatory Device and Conduit for Fiberoptic-Guided Endotracheal Intubation in Adults.
    Mishra N; Sinha N; Kharwar RK; Prakash J
    Cureus; 2024 Apr; 16(4):e58629. PubMed ID: 38770453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparative evaluation of Ambu Aura-i and Fastrach™ intubating laryngeal mask airway for tracheal intubation: A randomized controlled trial.
    Anand L; Singh M; Kapoor D; Singh A
    J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol; 2019; 35(1):70-75. PubMed ID: 31057244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of oropharyngeal leak pressure between the Ambu® AuraGain™ and the LMA® Supreme™ supraglottic airways: a randomized-controlled trial.
    Wong DT; Ooi A; Singh KP; Dallaire A; Meliana V; Lau J; Chung F; Singh M; Wong J
    Can J Anaesth; 2018 Jul; 65(7):797-805. PubMed ID: 29582360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A randomized comparison of the Ambu AuraGain versus the LMA supreme in patients undergoing gynaecologic laparoscopic surgery.
    Lopez AM; Agusti M; Gambus P; Pons M; Anglada T; Valero R
    J Clin Monit Comput; 2017 Dec; 31(6):1255-1262. PubMed ID: 27889843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Randomized crossover study assessing oropharyngeal leak pressure and fiber optic positioning : Laryngeal Mask Airway Supreme™ versus Laryngeal Tube LTS II™ size 2 in non-paralyzed anesthetized children.
    Gasteiger L; Ofner S; Stögermüller B; Ziegler B; Brimacombe J; Keller C
    Anaesthesist; 2016 Aug; 65(8):585-9. PubMed ID: 27380049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A randomized comparative study of three supraglottic airway devices for controlled ventilation in anesthetized patients.
    Sharma M; Sharma B; Gupta M; Panday BC; Sahai C; Sood J
    J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol; 2022; 38(2):221-227. PubMed ID: 36171925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of i-gel™ and Laryngeal Mask Airway Supreme™ in Different Head and Neck Positions in Spontaneously Breathing Pediatric Population.
    Gupta S; Dogra N; Chauhan K
    Anesth Essays Res; 2017; 11(3):647-650. PubMed ID: 28928564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A randomised, non-crossover study of the GuardianCPV Laryngeal Mask versus the LMA Supreme in paralysed, anaesthetised female patients.
    Tiefenthaler W; Eschertzhuber S; Brimacombe J; Fricke E; Keller C; Kaufmann M
    Anaesthesia; 2013 Jun; 68(6):600-4. PubMed ID: 23550791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of oropharyngeal leak pressure of air-Q™, i-gel™, and laryngeal mask airway supreme™ in adult patients during general anesthesia: A randomized controlled trial.
    Damodaran S; Sethi S; Malhotra SK; Samra T; Maitra S; Saini V
    Saudi J Anaesth; 2017; 11(4):390-395. PubMed ID: 29033717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.