These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27847533)
1. A multicentre survey of the condition of ultrasound probes. Dudley NJ; Woolley DJ Ultrasound; 2016 Nov; 24(4):190-197. PubMed ID: 27847533 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Blinded Comparison between an In-Air Reverberation Method and an Electronic Probe Tester in the Detection of Ultrasound Probe Faults. Dudley NJ; Woolley DJ Ultrasound Med Biol; 2017 Dec; 43(12):2954-2958. PubMed ID: 28967500 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Is Transducer Hygiene sufficient when Vaginal Probes are used in the Clinical Routine? Merz E Ultraschall Med; 2016 Apr; 37(2):137-9. PubMed ID: 27058433 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Ultrasound Probe Acceptance Testing Using the In-Air Reverberation Pattern. Dudley NJ Ultrasound Med Biol; 2019 Jun; 45(6):1475-1482. PubMed ID: 30940416 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A survey of ultrasound Quality Assurance implementation in the United Kingdom. Dudley NJ; Woolley DJ; Stevenson MA Ultrasound; 2022 Nov; 30(4):308-314. PubMed ID: 36969540 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The feasibility of implementation of ultrasound equipment standards set by United Kingdom professional bodies. Dudley NJ; Harries D; Wardle J Ultrasound; 2017 Feb; 25(1):25-34. PubMed ID: 28228822 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The analysis of in-air reverberation patterns from medical ultrasound transducers. Quinn T; Verma PK Ultrasound; 2014 Feb; 22(1):26-36. PubMed ID: 27433190 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A proposed enhancement to the in air sensitivity test for ultrasound quality assurance. Dudley NJ Phys Med; 2018 Sep; 53():1-3. PubMed ID: 30241743 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessment of Repaired Diagnostic Ultrasound Probes. Dudley NJ; Woolley DJ Ultrasound Med Biol; 2019 Oct; 45(10):2844-2850. PubMed ID: 31327490 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Routine Ultrasound Quality Assurance in a Multi-Unit Radiology Department: A Retrospective Evaluation of Transducer Failures. Vitikainen AM; Peltonen JI; Vartiainen E Ultrasound Med Biol; 2017 Sep; 43(9):1930-1937. PubMed ID: 28634042 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. BMUS guidelines for the regular quality assurance testing of ultrasound scanners by sonographers. Dudley N; Russell S; Ward B; Hoskins P; Ultrasound; 2014 Feb; 22(1):8-14. PubMed ID: 27433187 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A review of two alternative ultrasound quality assurance programmes. Dudley NJ; Griffith K; Houldsworth G; Holloway M; Dunn MA Eur J Ultrasound; 2001 Mar; 12(3):233-45. PubMed ID: 11423248 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A precise, reproducible method for measuring ultrasound probe slice thickness using a Gammex 403 phantom. Jackson SJ; Russell S Ultrasound; 2019 Aug; 27(3):148-155. PubMed ID: 32549894 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A Comparative Study on the Influence of Probe Placement on Quality Assurance Measurements in B-mode Ultrasound by Means of Ultrasound Phantoms. Scorza A; Conforto S; D'Anna C; Sciuto SA Open Biomed Eng J; 2015; 9():164-78. PubMed ID: 26312078 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A simple uniformity test for ultrasound phased arrays. Dudley NJ; Woolley DJ Phys Med; 2016 Sep; 32(9):1162-6. PubMed ID: 27546869 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Expanding the scope of practice for radiology managers: radiation safety duties. Orders AB; Wright D Radiol Manage; 2003; 25(4):40-7. PubMed ID: 12918277 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]