These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27847752)

  • 1. Screw-in forces during instrumentation by various file systems.
    Ha JH; Kwak SW; Kim SK; Kim HC
    Restor Dent Endod; 2016 Nov; 41(4):304-309. PubMed ID: 27847752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of Screw-In Forces during Movement of Endodontic Files with Different Geometries, Alloys, and Kinetics.
    Kwak SW; Lee CJ; Kim SK; Kim HC; Ha JH
    Materials (Basel); 2019 May; 12(9):. PubMed ID: 31072071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Influence of glide path on the screw-in effect and torque of nickel-titanium rotary files in simulated resin root canals.
    Ha JH; Park SS
    Restor Dent Endod; 2012 Nov; 37(4):215-9. PubMed ID: 23429968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Vibrations Generated by Several Nickel-titanium Endodontic File Systems during Canal Shaping in an Ex Vivo Model.
    Choi DM; Kim JW; Park SH; Cho KM; Kwak SW; Kim HC
    J Endod; 2017 Jul; 43(7):1197-1200. PubMed ID: 28454634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Shaping Ability of Reciproc R25 File and Mtwo System Used in Continuous and Reciprocating Motion.
    Campanella V; Gianni L; Libonati A; Gallusi G
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2020 Feb; 21(2):171-177. PubMed ID: 32381823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparative study of root canal shaping using protaper universal and protaper next rotary files in preclinical dental education.
    Çelik G; Özdemir Kısacık F; Yılmaz EF; Mersinlioğlu A; Ertuğrul İF; Orhan H
    PeerJ; 2019; 7():e7419. PubMed ID: 31489262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Shaping Ability of ProTaper Universal, ProTaper NEXT and WaveOne Primary in Severely Curved Resin Blocks.
    Tavanafar S; Gilani PV; Saleh AM; Schäfer E
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2019 Mar; 20(3):363-369. PubMed ID: 31204330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of apically extruded debris during root canal retreatment with several NiTi systems.
    Dincer AN; Er O; Canakci BC
    Int Endod J; 2015 Dec; 48(12):1194-8. PubMed ID: 25557631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Shaping ability of waveone primary reciprocating files and ProTaper system used in continuous and reciprocating motion.
    Giuliani V; Di Nasso L; Pace R; Pagavino G
    J Endod; 2014 Sep; 40(9):1468-71. PubMed ID: 25146035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Shaping potential of manual NiTi K-File and rotary ProTaper and analyzing the final outcome of shaped canals using CT.
    Kakar S; Dhingra A; Sharma H
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 May; 14(3):451-5. PubMed ID: 24171988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of the Shaping Characteristics of ProTaper Gold, ProTaper NEXT, and ProTaper Universal in Curved Canals.
    Gagliardi J; Versiani MA; de Sousa-Neto MD; Plazas-Garzon A; Basrani B
    J Endod; 2015 Oct; 41(10):1718-24. PubMed ID: 26321062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Shaping ability of the profile 25/0.06 and protaper F2 in rotary motion, and reciproc in simulated canals.
    Çelik G; Maden M; Savgat A; Orhan H
    PeerJ; 2018; 6():e6109. PubMed ID: 30581684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparative study of different novel nickel-titanium rotary systems for root canal preparation in severely curved root canals.
    Capar ID; Ertas H; Ok E; Arslan H; Ertas ET
    J Endod; 2014 Jun; 40(6):852-6. PubMed ID: 24862716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Efficacy of 2 reciprocating systems compared with a rotary retreatment system for gutta-percha removal.
    Rios Mde A; Villela AM; Cunha RS; Velasco RC; De Martin AS; Kato AS; Bueno CE
    J Endod; 2014 Apr; 40(4):543-6. PubMed ID: 24666908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Shaping ability of ProTaper Universal, WaveOne and ProTaper Next in simulated L-shaped and S-shaped root canals.
    Wu H; Peng C; Bai Y; Hu X; Wang L; Li C
    BMC Oral Health; 2015 Mar; 15():27. PubMed ID: 25886847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. In Vitro Comparison of Cyclic Fatigue Resistance of ProTaper Next, HyFlex CM, OneShape, and ProTaper Universal Instruments in a Canal with a Double Curvature.
    Topçuoğlu HS; Topçuoğlu G; Akti A; Düzgün S
    J Endod; 2016 Jun; 42(6):969-71. PubMed ID: 27091353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Elastic limits in torsion of reciprocating nickel-titanium instruments.
    Ha JH; Kim SR; Versluis A; Cheung GS; Kim JW; Kim HC
    J Endod; 2015 May; 41(5):715-9. PubMed ID: 25684433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Shaping ability and cleaning effectiveness of two single-file systems in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth: Reciproc and WaveOne versus Mtwo and ProTaper.
    Bürklein S; Hinschitza K; Dammaschke T; Schäfer E
    Int Endod J; 2012 May; 45(5):449-61. PubMed ID: 22188401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluating Transportation by Comparing Several uses of Rotary Endodontic Files.
    Elemam RF; Capelas JA; Vaz MA; Viriato N; Pereira ML; Azevedo A; West J
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2015 Dec; 16(12):927-32. PubMed ID: 27018025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparison of the shaping ability of reciprocating NiTi instruments in simulated curved canals.
    Yoo YS; Cho YB
    Restor Dent Endod; 2012 Nov; 37(4):220-7. PubMed ID: 23430033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.