These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
407 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27847914)
1. Ureteral stenting can be a negative predictor for successful outcome following shock wave lithotripsy in patients with ureteral stones. Kang DH; Cho KS; Ham WS; Chung DY; Kwon JK; Choi YD; Lee JY Investig Clin Urol; 2016 Nov; 57(6):408-416. PubMed ID: 27847914 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Impact of colic pain as a significant factor for predicting the stone free rate of one-session shock wave lithotripsy for treating ureter stones: a Bayesian logistic regression model analysis. Chung DY; Cho KS; Lee DH; Han JH; Kang DH; Jung HD; Kown JK; Ham WS; Choi YD; Lee JY PLoS One; 2015; 10(4):e0123800. PubMed ID: 25902059 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Predictive factors and treatment outcomes of Steinstrasse following shock wave lithotripsy for ureteral calculi: A Bayesian regression model analysis. Kang HW; Cho KS; Ham WS; Kang DH; Jung HD; Kwon JK; Choi YD; Lee JY Investig Clin Urol; 2018 Mar; 59(2):112-118. PubMed ID: 29520387 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Stone heterogeneity index as the standard deviation of Hounsfield units: A novel predictor for shock-wave lithotripsy outcomes in ureter calculi. Lee JY; Kim JH; Kang DH; Chung DY; Lee DH; Do Jung H; Kwon JK; Cho KS Sci Rep; 2016 Apr; 6():23988. PubMed ID: 27035621 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. How do stone attenuation and skin-to-stone distance in computed tomography influence the performance of shock wave lithotripsy in ureteral stone disease? Müllhaupt G; Engeler DS; Schmid HP; Abt D BMC Urol; 2015 Jul; 15():72. PubMed ID: 26201514 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Impact of Pretreatment Hydronephrosis on the Success Rate of Shock Wave Lithotripsy in Patients with Ureteral Stone. Chang KD; Lee JY; Park SY; Kang DH; Lee HH; Cho KS Yonsei Med J; 2017 Sep; 58(5):1000-1005. PubMed ID: 28792145 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluating the importance of mean stone density and skin-to-stone distance in predicting successful shock wave lithotripsy of renal and ureteric calculi. Wiesenthal JD; Ghiculete D; D'A Honey RJ; Pace KT Urol Res; 2010 Aug; 38(4):307-13. PubMed ID: 20625891 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. External Validation of Triple D Score in an Elderly (≥65 Years) Population for Prediction of Success Following Shockwave Lithotripsy. Gökce MI; Esen B; Gülpınar B; Süer E; Gülpınar Ö J Endourol; 2016 Sep; 30(9):1009-16. PubMed ID: 27392789 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Simple and practical nomograms for predicting the stone-free rate after shock wave lithotripsy in patients with a solitary upper ureteral stone. Niwa N; Matsumoto K; Miyahara M; Omura M; Kobayashi H; Kikuchi E; Miyajima A; Miyata K; Oya M World J Urol; 2017 Sep; 35(9):1455-1461. PubMed ID: 28220189 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A new nomogram for prediction of outcome of pediatric shock-wave lithotripsy. Dogan HS; Altan M; Citamak B; Bozaci AC; Karabulut E; Tekgul S J Pediatr Urol; 2015 Apr; 11(2):84.e1-6. PubMed ID: 25812469 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Computed Tomography-Based Novel Prediction Model for the Outcome of Shockwave Lithotripsy in Proximal Ureteral Stones. Park HS; Gong MK; Yoon CY; Moon du G; Cheon J; Choi YD J Endourol; 2016 Jul; 30(7):810-6. PubMed ID: 27042952 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of computed tomography findings for success prediction after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for urinary tract stone disease. Celik S; Bozkurt O; Kaya FG; Egriboyun S; Demir O; Secil M; Celebi I Int Urol Nephrol; 2015 Jan; 47(1):69-73. PubMed ID: 25311505 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A Prospective Evaluation of High-Resolution CT Parameters in Predicting Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy Success for Upper Urinary Tract Calculi. Abdelhamid M; Mosharafa AA; Ibrahim H; Selim HM; Hamed M; Elghoneimy MN; Salem HK; Abdelazim MS; Badawy H J Endourol; 2016 Nov; 30(11):1227-1232. PubMed ID: 27597174 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Factors determining stone-free rate in shock wave lithotripsy using standard focus of Storz Modulith SLX-F2 lithotripter. Elkoushy MA; Hassan JA; Morehouse DD; Anidjar M; Andonian S Urology; 2011 Oct; 78(4):759-63. PubMed ID: 21550641 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Impact of Percutaneous Nephrostomy on the Efficacy of in Situ Shock Wave Lithotripsy for Upper Ureteral Stones. Yang SW; Lee JY; Shin JH; Lim JS; Song KH Urol J; 2021 Aug; 19(4):262-267. PubMed ID: 34390249 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Efficacy of electromagnetic extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy on high-density ureteral stones. Bongrand B; Millet I; Autissier C; Faget C; Robert M Prog Urol; 2022 Jul; 32(8-9):608-615. PubMed ID: 35135703 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Single-session extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for urinary calculi: factors predicting success after three weeks of follow-up]. Vivaldi B; Fernández MI; López JF; Fuentes F; Urzúa C; Krebs A; Domenech A; Figueroa PA; Pizzi P; Westendarp M; Zambrano N; Castro M; Coz LF Actas Urol Esp; 2011 Oct; 35(9):529-33. PubMed ID: 21684634 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Single extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy for proximal ureter stones: Can CT texture analysis technique help predict the therapeutic effect? Xun Y; Li J; Geng Y; Liu Z; Yu X; Wang X; Xiao F; Li Z; Li C; Wang S Eur J Radiol; 2018 Oct; 107():84-89. PubMed ID: 30292278 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Noncontrast computed tomography can predict the outcome of shockwave lithotripsy via accurate stone measurement and abdominal fat distribution determination. Geng JH; Tu HP; Shih PM; Shen JT; Jang MY; Wu WJ; Li CC; Chou YH; Juan YS Kaohsiung J Med Sci; 2015 Jan; 31(1):34-41. PubMed ID: 25600918 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A novel model using computed tomography parameters to predict shock wave lithotripsy success in ureteral stones at different locations. Akkaş F; Culha MG; Ayten A; Danacıoğlu YO; Yildiz Ö; İnci E; Guner E; Şahin S Actas Urol Esp (Engl Ed); 2022 Mar; 46(2):114-121. PubMed ID: 35184987 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]