These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

918 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27849142)

  • 1. The Experience of Surrogate Decision Makers on Being Approached for Consent for Patient Participation in Research. A Multicenter Study.
    Burns KE; Prats CJ; Maione M; Lanceta M; Zubrinich C; Jeffs L; Smith OM;
    Ann Am Thorac Soc; 2017 Feb; 14(2):238-245. PubMed ID: 27849142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Surrogate Informed Consent: A Qualitative Analysis of Surrogate Decision Makers' Perspectives.
    Lane T; Brereton E; Nowels C; McKeehan J; Moss M; Matlock DD
    Ann Am Thorac Soc; 2021 Jul; 18(7):1185-1190. PubMed ID: 33529538
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Is there a role for physician involvement in introducing research to surrogate decision makers in the intensive care unit? (The Approach trial: a pilot mixed methods study).
    Burns KE; Rizvi L; Smith OM; Lee Y; Lee J; Wang M; Brown M; Parker M; Premji A; Leung D; Hammond Mobilio M; Gotlib-Conn L; Nisenbaum R; Santos M; Li Y; Mehta S
    Intensive Care Med; 2015 Jan; 41(1):58-67. PubMed ID: 25491659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Barriers and Facilitators of Surrogates Providing Consent for Critically Ill Patients in Clinical Trials: A Qualitative Study.
    Krutsinger DC; Maloney SI; Courtright KR; Bartels K
    Chest; 2024 Aug; 166(2):304-310. PubMed ID: 38387647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Exploring the experiences of substitute decision-makers with an exception to consent in a paediatric resuscitation randomised controlled trial: study protocol for a qualitative research study.
    Parker MJ; de Laat S; Schwartz L
    BMJ Open; 2016 Sep; 6(9):e012931. PubMed ID: 27625066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Why substitute decision makers provide or decline consent for ICU research studies: a questionnaire study.
    Mehta S; Quittnat Pelletier F; Brown M; Ethier C; Wells D; Burry L; MacDonald R
    Intensive Care Med; 2012 Jan; 38(1):47-54. PubMed ID: 22120767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Prevalence of and Factors Related to Discordance About Prognosis Between Physicians and Surrogate Decision Makers of Critically Ill Patients.
    White DB; Ernecoff N; Buddadhumaruk P; Hong S; Weissfeld L; Curtis JR; Luce JM; Lo B
    JAMA; 2016 May; 315(19):2086-94. PubMed ID: 27187301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Research recruitment practices and critically ill patients. A multicenter, cross-sectional study (the Consent Study).
    Burns KE; Zubrinich C; Tan W; Raptis S; Xiong W; Smith O; McDonald E; Marshall JC; Saginur R; Heslegrave R; Rubenfeld G; Cook DJ;
    Am J Respir Crit Care Med; 2013 Jun; 187(11):1212-8. PubMed ID: 23525935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Exploring the experiences and perspectives of substitute decision-makers involved in decisions about deceased organ donation: a qualitative study protocol.
    Crawshaw J; Presseau J; van Allen Z; Pinheiro Carvalho L; Jordison K; English S; Fergusson DA; Lauzier F; Turgeon AF; Sarti AJ; Martin C; D'Aragon F; Li AH; Knoll G; Ball I; Brehaut J; Burns KEA; Fortin MC; Weiss M; Meade M; Marsolais P; Shemie S; Zaabat S; Dhanani S; Kitto SC; Chassé M;
    BMJ Open; 2019 Dec; 9(12):e034594. PubMed ID: 31874899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Real-time perspectives of surrogate decision-makers regarding critical illness research: findings of focus group participants.
    Iverson E; Celious A; Kennedy CR; Shehane E; Eastman A; Warren V; Bolcic-Jankovic D; Clarridge B; Freeman BD
    Chest; 2012 Dec; 142(6):1433-1439. PubMed ID: 22677349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Does difficulty functioning in the surrogate role equate to vulnerability in critical illness research? Use of path analysis to examine the relationship between difficulty providing substituted judgment and receptivity to critical illness research participation.
    Clarridge BR; Bolcic-Jankovic D; LeBlanc J; Mahmood RS; Kennedy CR; Freeman BD
    J Crit Care; 2015 Dec; 30(6):1310-6. PubMed ID: 26304514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Surrogate and patient discrepancy regarding consent for critical care research.
    Newman JT; Smart A; Reese TR; Williams A; Moss M
    Crit Care Med; 2012 Sep; 40(9):2590-4. PubMed ID: 22732283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Critical illness research involving collection of genomic data: the conundrum posed by low levels of genomic literacy among surrogate decision makers for critically ill patients.
    Iverson E; Celious A; Shehane E; Oerke M; Warren V; Eastman A; Kennedy CR; Freeman BD
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2013 Jul; 8(3):53-7. PubMed ID: 23933776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Factors affecting stress experienced by surrogate decision makers for critically ill patients: implications for nursing practice.
    Iverson E; Celious A; Kennedy CR; Shehane E; Eastman A; Warren V; Freeman BD
    Intensive Crit Care Nurs; 2014 Apr; 30(2):77-85. PubMed ID: 24211047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. "A feeling that you're helping": proxy decision making for Alzheimer's research.
    Dunn LB; Hoop JG; Misra S; Fisher SR; Roberts LW
    Narrat Inq Bioeth; 2011; 1(2):107-22. PubMed ID: 24406656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Association of Surrogate Decision-making Interventions for Critically Ill Adults With Patient, Family, and Resource Use Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Bibas L; Peretz-Larochelle M; Adhikari NK; Goldfarb MJ; Luk A; Englesakis M; Detsky ME; Lawler PR
    JAMA Netw Open; 2019 Jul; 2(7):e197229. PubMed ID: 31322688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Genetic research and testing in critical care: surrogates' perspective.
    Freeman BD; Kennedy CR; Coopersmith CM; Zehnbauer BA; Buchman TG
    Crit Care Med; 2006 Apr; 34(4):986-94. PubMed ID: 16484903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Exploring determinants of surrogate decision-maker confidence: an example from the ICU.
    Bolcic-Jankovic D; Clarridge BR; LeBlanc JL; Mahmood RS; Roman AM; Freeman BD
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2014 Oct; 9(4):76-85. PubMed ID: 25747298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Which factors influence the resort to surrogate consent in stroke trials, and what are the patient outcomes in this context?
    Mendyk AM; Labreuche J; Henon H; Girot M; Cordonnier C; Duhamel A; Leys D; Bordet R
    BMC Med Ethics; 2015 Apr; 16():26. PubMed ID: 25903471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Doubt and belief in physicians' ability to prognosticate during critical illness: the perspective of surrogate decision makers.
    Zier LS; Burack JH; Micco G; Chipman AK; Frank JA; Luce JM; White DB
    Crit Care Med; 2008 Aug; 36(8):2341-7. PubMed ID: 18596630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 46.