187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27849498)
1. Explaining Performance on Military Tasks in the Canadian Armed Forces: The Importance of Morphological and Physical Fitness Characteristics.
Tingelstad HC; Theoret D; Spicovck M; Haman F
Mil Med; 2016 Nov; 181(11):e1623-e1629. PubMed ID: 27849498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Development of physical fitness standards for Canadian Armed Forces younger personnel.
Stevenson JM; Bryant JT; Andrew GM; Smith JT; French SL; Thomson JM; Deakin JM
Can J Sport Sci; 1992 Sep; 17(3):214-21. PubMed ID: 1325261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Body mass index predicts selected physical fitness attributes but is not associated with performance on military relevant tasks in U.S. Army Soldiers.
Pierce JR; DeGroot DW; Grier TL; Hauret KG; Nindl BC; East WB; McGurk MS; Jones BH
J Sci Med Sport; 2017 Nov; 20 Suppl 4():S79-S84. PubMed ID: 28919497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The influence of anthropometrics on physical employment standard performance.
Reilly T; Spivock M; Prayal-Brown A; Stockbrugger B; Blacklock R
Occup Med (Lond); 2016 Oct; 66(7):576-9. PubMed ID: 27261454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Physiological Demands of Basic Fire Management Tasks in Members of the Canadian Armed Forces: A Pilot Study.
Chassé É; Théoret D; Poirier MP; Lalonde F
Mil Med; 2023 May; 188(5-6):e942-e948. PubMed ID: 34652444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Association Between Musculoskeletal Injuries and the Canadian Armed Forces Physical Employment Standard Proxy in Canadian Military Recruits.
Chassé E; Laroche MA; Dufour CA; Guimond R; Lalonde F
Mil Med; 2020 Aug; 185(7-8):e1140-e1146. PubMed ID: 32383455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Twelve weeks of concurrent resistance and interval training improves military occupational task performance in men and women.
Sterczala AJ; Krajewski KT; Peterson PA; Sekel NM; Lovalekar M; Wardle SL; O'Leary TJ; Greeves JP; Flanagan SD; Connaboy C; Nindl BC
Eur J Sport Sci; 2023 Dec; 23(12):2411-2424. PubMed ID: 37517090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluating the occupational physical fitness of Canadian forces infantry personnel.
Jetté M; Kimick A; Sidney K
Mil Med; 1989 Jun; 154(6):318-22. PubMed ID: 2498769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Development of physical fitness standards for Canadian Armed Forces older personnel.
Stevenson JM; Deakin JM; Andrew GM; Bryant JT; Smith JT; Thomson JM
Can J Appl Physiol; 1994 Mar; 19(1):75-90. PubMed ID: 8186764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The FORCE Fitness Profile--Adding a Measure of Health-Related Fitness to the Canadian Armed Forces Operational Fitness Evaluation.
Gagnon P; Spivock M; Reilly T; Mattie P; Stockbrugger B
J Strength Cond Res; 2015 Nov; 29 Suppl 11():S192-8. PubMed ID: 26506187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Functional physical training improves women's military occupational performance.
Nindl BC; Eagle SR; Frykman PN; Palmer C; Lammi E; Reynolds K; Allison K; Harman E
J Sci Med Sport; 2017 Nov; 20 Suppl 4():S91-S97. PubMed ID: 28986086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Standard Establishment Through Scenarios (SETS): A new technique for occupational fitness standards.
Blacklock RE; Reilly TJ; Spivock M; Newton PS; Olinek SM
Work; 2015; 52(2):375-83. PubMed ID: 26409372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Reliability of the individual components of the Canadian Armed Forces Physical Employment Standard.
Stockbrugger BG; Reilly TJ; Blacklock RE; Gagnon PJ
Appl Physiol Nutr Metab; 2018 Jul; 43(7):663-668. PubMed ID: 29378155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Predictors of Military Task Performance: Maximal Lift Capacity.
Hydren JR; Borges AS; Sharp MA
J Strength Cond Res; 2017 Apr; 31(4):1142-1164. PubMed ID: 28135227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Associations Between Rank, Sex, and Parity With Musculoskeletal Injuries Sustained During Annual Military Physical Fitness Test.
Edwards CM; da Silva DF; Puranda JL; Souza SCS; Semeniuk K; Adamo KB
J Strength Cond Res; 2024 Feb; 38(2):367-373. PubMed ID: 37815270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Concept for a Predeployment Assessment of Basic Military Fitness in the German Armed Forces.
Rohde U; Sievert A; Rüther T; Witzki A; Leyk D
J Strength Cond Res; 2015 Nov; 29 Suppl 11():S211-5. PubMed ID: 26506190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Performance differences between male and female marines on standardized physical fitness tests and combat proxy tasks: identifying the gap.
Jameson J; Pappa L; McGuire B; Kelly KR
US Army Med Dep J; 2015; ():12-21. PubMed ID: 26159007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. U.S. Army Physical Demands Study: Differences in Physical Fitness and Occupational Task Performance Between Trainees and Active Duty Soldiers.
Canino MC; Foulis SA; Zambraski EJ; Cohen BS; Redmond JE; Hauret KG; Frykman PN; Sharp MA
J Strength Cond Res; 2019 Jul; 33(7):1864-1870. PubMed ID: 29952870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Physical, Physiological, and Dietary Comparisons Between Marine Corps Forces Special Operations Command Critical Skills Operators and Enablers.
Royer SD; Thomas DT; Winters JD; Abt JP; Best S; Poploski KM; Zalaiskalns A; Lephart SM
Mil Med; 2018 Nov; 183(11-12):e341-e347. PubMed ID: 29635381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Physical Fitness Predictors of a Warrior Task Simulation Test.
Huang HC; Nagai T; Lovalekar M; Connaboy C; Nindl BC
J Strength Cond Res; 2018 Sep; 32(9):2562-2568. PubMed ID: 30137030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
