BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

245 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27849674)

  • 1. Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: How Is It Classified?
    Schroeder GD; Kurd MF; Vaccaro AR
    J Am Acad Orthop Surg; 2016 Dec; 24(12):843-852. PubMed ID: 27849674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Determinants of outcome in lumbar spinal stenosis surgery.
    Sigmundsson FG
    Acta Orthop Suppl; 2014 Dec; 85(357):1-45. PubMed ID: 25491267
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Impact of obesity on complications and outcomes: a comparison of fusion and nonfusion lumbar spine surgery.
    Onyekwelu I; Glassman SD; Asher AL; Shaffrey CI; Mummaneni PV; Carreon LY
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Feb; 26(2):158-162. PubMed ID: 27740396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Surgical results in hidden lumbar spinal stenosis detected by axial loaded computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging: an outcome study.
    Willén J; Wessberg PJ; Danielsson B
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Feb; 33(4):E109-15. PubMed ID: 18277859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Aperius interspinous implant versus open surgical decompression in lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Postacchini R; Ferrari E; Cinotti G; Menchetti PP; Postacchini F
    Spine J; 2011 Oct; 11(10):933-9. PubMed ID: 22005077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Lumbar spinal stenosis].
    Andresen AK; Ernst C; Andersen MØ
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2016 Oct; 178(41):. PubMed ID: 27745582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Sagittal Balance Does not Influence the 1 Year Clinical Outcome of Patients With Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Without Obvious Instability After Microsurgical Decompression.
    Bayerl SH; Pöhlmann F; Finger T; Onken J; Franke J; Czabanka M; Woitzik J; Vajkoczy P
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2015 Jul; 40(13):1014-21. PubMed ID: 25893354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Classification and diagnosis of lumbar spinal stenosis].
    Arabmotlagh M; Sellei RM; Vinas-Rios JM; Rauschmann M
    Orthopade; 2019 Oct; 48(10):816-823. PubMed ID: 31101963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Systematic circumferential (360 degree) decompression treatment of major arthrotic cervical stenosis].
    Mazel C; Trabelsi R; Antonietti P
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2002 Sep; 88(5):449-59. PubMed ID: 12399709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Microsurgical decompression of lumbar spinal stenosis].
    Drumm J; Branea I; Pitzen T
    Orthopade; 2010 Jun; 39(6):551-8. PubMed ID: 20480133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of minimally invasive decompression surgery on quality of life in older patients with spinal stenosis.
    Dagistan Y; Dagistan E; Gezici AR; Cancan SE; Bilgi M; Cakir U
    Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2015 Dec; 139():86-90. PubMed ID: 26397214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Prospective analysis of surgical outcomes in patients undergoing decompressive laminectomy and posterior instrumentation for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Gelalis ID; Arnaoutoglou C; Christoforou G; Lykissas MG; Batsilas I; Xenakis T
    Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc; 2010; 44(3):235-40. PubMed ID: 21088465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Revision lumbar surgery in elderly patients with symptomatic pseudarthrosis, adjacent-segment disease, or same-level recurrent stenosis. Part 1. Two-year outcomes and clinical efficacy: clinical article.
    Adogwa O; Carr RK; Kudyba K; Karikari I; Bagley CA; Gokaslan ZL; Theodore N; Cheng JS
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2013 Feb; 18(2):139-46. PubMed ID: 23231354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reoperation rate after surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis without spondylolisthesis: a nationwide cohort study.
    Kim CH; Chung CK; Park CS; Choi B; Hahn S; Kim MJ; Lee KS; Park BJ
    Spine J; 2013 Oct; 13(10):1230-7. PubMed ID: 24017959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of indirect decompression of the lumbar spinal canal following minimally invasive lateral transpsoas interbody fusion: radiographic and outcome analysis.
    Elowitz EH; Yanni DS; Chwajol M; Starke RM; Perin NI
    Minim Invasive Neurosurg; 2011 Oct; 54(5-6):201-6. PubMed ID: 22278781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Is There an Association Between Radiological Severity of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis and Disability, Pain, or Surgical Outcome?: A Multicenter Observational Study.
    Weber C; Giannadakis C; Rao V; Jakola AS; Nerland U; Nygaard ØP; Solberg TK; Gulati S; Solheim O
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2016 Jan; 41(2):E78-83. PubMed ID: 26352747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reducing surgical levels by paraspinal mapping and diffusion tensor imaging techniques in lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Chen HB; Wan Q; Xu QF; Chen Y; Bai B
    J Orthop Surg Res; 2016 Apr; 11(1):47. PubMed ID: 27113931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Static balance after surgical decompression of lumbar spinal canal stenosis.
    Truszczyńska A; Drzał-Grabiec J; Trzaskoma Z; Rachwał M; Rapała K; Górniak K
    J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil; 2015; 28(4):865-71. PubMed ID: 26519120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Functional outcome of surgical treatment for multilevel lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Zouboulis P; Karageorgos A; Dimakopoulos P; Tyllianakis M; Matzaroglou C; Lambiris E
    Acta Orthop; 2006 Aug; 77(4):670-6. PubMed ID: 16929447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Readmission rates after decompression surgery in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis among Medicare beneficiaries.
    Modhia U; Takemoto S; Braid-Forbes MJ; Weber M; Berven SH
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Apr; 38(7):591-6. PubMed ID: 23324923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.