149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27853499)
21. Detection of vertical root fractures by conventional radiographic examination and cone beam computed tomography - an in vitro analysis.
da Silveira PF; Vizzotto MB; Liedke GS; da Silveira HL; Montagner F; da Silveira HE
Dent Traumatol; 2013 Feb; 29(1):41-6. PubMed ID: 22413921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Evaluation of cone-beam computed tomography in the diagnosis of simulated small osseous defects in the mandibular condyle.
Patel A; Tee BC; Fields H; Jones E; Chaudhry J; Sun Z
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Feb; 145(2):143-56. PubMed ID: 24485728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. How Does Voxel Size of Cone-beam Computed Tomography Effect Accurate Detection of Root Strip Perforations.
Afkhami F; Ghoncheh Z; Khadiv F; Kaviani H; Shamshiri AR
Iran Endod J; 2021; 16(1):43-48. PubMed ID: 36704411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Effect of Field of View on Detection of Condyle Bone Defects Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography.
Salemi F; Shokri A; Maleki FH; Farhadian M; Dashti G; Ostovarrad F; Ranjzad H
J Craniofac Surg; 2016 May; 27(3):644-8. PubMed ID: 27092920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. In-vitro comparison of 2 cone-beam computed tomography systems and panoramic imaging for detecting simulated canine impaction-induced external root resorption in maxillary lateral incisors.
Alqerban A; Jacobs R; Souza PC; Willems G
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Dec; 136(6):764.e1-11; discussion 764-5. PubMed ID: 19962592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Quantification of external root resorption by low- vs high-resolution cone-beam computed tomography and periapical radiography: A volumetric and linear analysis.
Ponder SN; Benavides E; Kapila S; Hatch NE
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Jan; 143(1):77-91. PubMed ID: 23273363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Diagnosis of external root resorption in teeth close and distant to zirconium implants: influence of acquisition parameters and artefacts produced during cone beam computed tomography.
Freitas DQ; Nascimento EHL; Vasconcelos TV; Noujeim M
Int Endod J; 2019 Jun; 52(6):866-873. PubMed ID: 30585641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The impact of different voxels and exposure parameters of CBCT for the assessment of external root resorptions: A phantom study.
Goller Bulut D; Uğur Aydın Z
Aust Endod J; 2019 Aug; 45(2):146-153. PubMed ID: 31267607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Diagnostic Accuracy of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography and Periapical Radiography in Internal Root Resorption.
Madani Z; Moudi E; Bijani A; Mahmoudi E
Iran Endod J; 2016; 11(1):51-6. PubMed ID: 26843878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Diagnostic ability of computed tomography to evaluate external root resorption in vitro.
da Silveira HL; Silveira HE; Liedke GS; Lermen CA; Dos Santos RB; de Figueiredo JA
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2007 Oct; 36(7):393-6. PubMed ID: 17881597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. CBCT-based volume of simulated root resorption - influence of FOV and voxel size.
Da Silveira PF; Fontana MP; Oliveira HW; Vizzotto MB; Montagner F; Silveira HL; Silveira HE
Int Endod J; 2015 Oct; 48(10):959-65. PubMed ID: 25283786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Factors affecting the accuracy of buccal alveolar bone height measurements from cone-beam computed tomography images.
Wood R; Sun Z; Chaudhry J; Tee BC; Kim DG; Leblebicioglu B; England G
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Mar; 143(3):353-63. PubMed ID: 23452969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. CBCT for the assessment of second mesiobuccal (MB2) canals in maxillary molar teeth: effect of voxel size and presence of root filling.
Vizzotto MB; Silveira PF; Arús NA; Montagner F; Gomes BP; da Silveira HE
Int Endod J; 2013 Sep; 46(9):870-6. PubMed ID: 23442087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Influence of cone-beam computed tomography enhancement filters on diagnosis of simulated external root resorption.
de Azevedo Vaz SL; Vasconcelos TV; Neves FS; de Freitas DQ; Haiter-Neto F
J Endod; 2012 Mar; 38(3):305-8. PubMed ID: 22341065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. DIAGNOSTIC PERFORMANCE OF CONE-BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY TO DIAGNOSE IN VIVO/IN VITRO ROOT RESORPTION: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS.
Baena-de la Iglesia T; Yañez-Vico RM; Iglesias-Linares A
J Evid Based Dent Pract; 2023 Mar; 23(1):101803. PubMed ID: 36914301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Effect of Voxel Size and Object Location in the Field of View on Detection of Bone Defects in Cone Beam Computed Tomography.
Fakhar HB; Mallahi M; Panjnoush M; Kashani PM
J Dent (Tehran); 2016 Aug; 13(4):279-286. PubMed ID: 28127320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Detection of vertical root fractures in the presence of intracanal metallic post: a comparison between periapical radiography and cone-beam computed tomography.
Junqueira RB; Verner FS; Campos CN; Devito KL; do Carmo AM
J Endod; 2013 Dec; 39(12):1620-4. PubMed ID: 24238460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Diagnostic Accuracy of CBCT with Different Voxel Sizes and Intraoral Digital Radiography for Detection of Periapical Bone Lesions: An Ex-Vivo Study.
Sakhdari S; Talaeipour AR; Talaeipour M; Pazhutan M; Tehrani SH; Kharazifard MJ
J Dent (Tehran); 2016 Mar; 13(2):77-84. PubMed ID: 27928235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Diagnostic Accuracy of Three Cone Beam Computed Tomography Systems and Periapical Radiography for Detection of Fenestration Around Dental Implants.
Eskandarloo A; Saati S; Ardakani MP; Jamalpour M; Gholi Mezerji NM; Akheshteh V
Contemp Clin Dent; 2018; 9(3):376-381. PubMed ID: 30166830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. External Cervical Resorption: A Comparison of the Diagnostic Efficacy Using 2 Different Cone-beam Computed Tomographic Units and Periapical Radiographs.
Vaz de Souza D; Schirru E; Mannocci F; Foschi F; Patel S
J Endod; 2017 Jan; 43(1):121-125. PubMed ID: 27939734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
