149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27853499)
41. Comparison between cone-beam computed tomography and intraoral digital radiography for assessment of tooth root lesions.
Kumar V; Gossett L; Blattner A; Iwasaki LR; Williams K; Nickel JC
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Jun; 139(6):e533-41. PubMed ID: 21640865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Diagnostic accuracy of small volume cone beam computed tomography and intraoral periapical radiography for the detection of simulated external inflammatory root resorption.
Durack C; Patel S; Davies J; Wilson R; Mannocci F
Int Endod J; 2011 Feb; 44(2):136-47. PubMed ID: 21083575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. An ex vivo comparison of diagnostic accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography and periapical radiography in the detection of furcal perforations.
Kamburoğlu K; Yeta EN; Yılmaz F
J Endod; 2015 May; 41(5):696-702. PubMed ID: 25684431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Could cone-beam computed tomography demonstrate the lateral accessory canals?
Ji Y; Wen S; Liu S; Zhu M; Yao M; Wang T; Lin Z
BMC Oral Health; 2017 Nov; 17(1):142. PubMed ID: 29187181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Accuracy Assessment of Three-dimensional Surface Reconstructions of In vivo Teeth from Cone-beam Computed Tomography.
Sang YH; Hu HC; Lu SH; Wu YW; Li WR; Tang ZH
Chin Med J (Engl); 2016 Jun; 129(12):1464-70. PubMed ID: 27270544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Assessment of Volumetric Distortion Artifact in Filled Root Canals Using Different Cone-beam Computed Tomographic Devices.
Celikten B; Jacobs R; deFaria Vasconcelos K; Huang Y; Nicolielo LFP; Orhan K
J Endod; 2017 Sep; 43(9):1517-1521. PubMed ID: 28673491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Comparison of cone-beam computed tomography with bitewing radiography for detection of periodontal bone loss and assessment of effects of different voxel resolutions: an in vitro study.
Cetmili H; Tassoker M; Sener S
Oral Radiol; 2019 May; 35(2):177-183. PubMed ID: 30484193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Diagnostic accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography with modified grayscale range for detection of buccal cortical plate defects adjacent to dental implants.
Yaghoobi S; Kajan ZD; Khosravifard N; Sigaroudi AK; Jouybari RM
Dent Res J (Isfahan); 2023; 20():90. PubMed ID: 37810449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. The detection and management of root resorption lesions using intraoral radiography and cone beam computed tomography - an in vivo investigation.
Patel S; Dawood A; Wilson R; Horner K; Mannocci F
Int Endod J; 2009 Sep; 42(9):831-8. PubMed ID: 19627378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Effect of Time Lapse on the Diagnostic Accuracy of Cone Beam Computed Tomography for Detection of Vertical Root Fractures.
Eskandarloo A; Asl AM; Jalalzadeh M; Tayari M; Hosseinipanah M; Fardmal J; Shokri A
Braz Dent J; 2016; 27(1):16-21. PubMed ID: 27007339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Accuracy of linear and volumetric measurements of artificial ERR cavities by using CBCT images obtained at 4 different voxel sizes and measured by using 4 different software: an ex vivo research.
Sönmez G; Koç C; Kamburoğlu K
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2018 Dec; 47(8):20170325. PubMed ID: 29851352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Accuracy of in-vitro tooth volumetric measurements from cone-beam computed tomography.
Ye N; Jian F; Xue J; Wang S; Liao L; Huang W; Yang X; Zhou Y; Lai W; Li J; Wang J
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Dec; 142(6):879-87. PubMed ID: 23195374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Accuracy of volumetric measurement of simulated root resorption lacunas based on cone beam computed tomography.
Wang Y; He S; Guo Y; Wang S; Chen S
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2013 Aug; 16(3):169-76. PubMed ID: 23419069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Risk factors for external root resorption of maxillary second molars due to impacted third molars as evaluated using cone beam computed tomography.
Schriber M; Rivola M; Leung YY; Bornstein MM; Suter VGA
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2020 May; 49(5):666-672. PubMed ID: 31676229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Reliability and accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography voxel density and linear distance measurement at different voxel sizes: A study on sheep head cadaver.
Güngör E; Doğan MS
J Dent Sci; 2017 Jun; 12(2):145-150. PubMed ID: 30895040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Accuracy of in vitro mandibular volumetric measurements from CBCT of different voxel sizes with different segmentation threshold settings.
Dong T; Xia L; Cai C; Yuan L; Ye N; Fang B
BMC Oral Health; 2019 Sep; 19(1):206. PubMed ID: 31484529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Effect of voxel size on accuracy of cone beam computed tomography-aided assessment of periodontal furcation involvement.
Kamburoğlu K; Ereş G; Akgün C; Yeta EN; Gülen O; Karacaoĝlu F
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2015 Nov; 120(5):644-50. PubMed ID: 26337220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Effects of voxel size and resolution on the accuracy of endodontic length measurement using cone beam computed tomography.
Aktan AM; Yildirim C; Karataşlıoğlu E; Çiftçi ME; Aksoy F
Ann Anat; 2016 Nov; 208():96-102. PubMed ID: 27339301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Limitation of diagnostic value of cone-beam CT in detecting apical root isthmuses.
Tolentino ES; Amoroso-Silva PA; Alcalde MP; Honório HM; Iwaki LCV; Rubira-Bullen IRF; Húngaro-Duarte MA
J Appl Oral Sci; 2020; 28():e20190168. PubMed ID: 32236352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Detection of periimplant fenestration and dehiscence with the use of two scan modes and the smallest voxel sizes of a cone-beam computed tomography device.
de-Azevedo-Vaz SL; Vasconcelos Kde F; Neves FS; Melo SL; Campos PS; Haiter-Neto F
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2013 Jan; 115(1):121-7. PubMed ID: 23217543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
