These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27854178)
41. Alteration of the DNA methylation status of donor cells impairs the developmental competence of porcine cloned embryos. Huan YJ; Wu ZF; Zhang JG; Zhu J; Xie BT; Wang JY; Li JY; Xue BH; Kong QR; Liu ZH J Reprod Dev; 2016; 62(1):71-7. PubMed ID: 26537205 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Effect of Cell Cycle Interactions and Inhibition of Histone Deacetylases on Development of Porcine Embryos Produced by Nuclear Transfer. Rissi VB; Glanzner WG; Mujica LK; Antoniazzi AQ; Gonçalves PB; Bordignon V Cell Reprogram; 2016 Feb; 18(1):8-16. PubMed ID: 27281695 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. BIX-01294 increases pig cloning efficiency by improving epigenetic reprogramming of somatic cell nuclei. Huang J; Zhang H; Yao J; Qin G; Wang F; Wang X; Luo A; Zheng Q; Cao C; Zhao J Reproduction; 2016 Jan; 151(1):39-49. PubMed ID: 26604326 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Developmental capacity of ferret embryos by nuclear transfer using G0/G1-phase fetal fibroblasts. Li Z; Rezaei Sabet M; Zhou Q; Liu X; Ding W; Zhang Y; Renard JP; Engelhardt JF Biol Reprod; 2003 Jun; 68(6):2297-303. PubMed ID: 12606336 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Effect of transgene introduction and recloning on efficiency of porcine transgenic cloned embryo production in vitro. Uhm SJ; Gupta MK; Das ZC; Kim JH; Park C; Kim T; Lee HT Reprod Domest Anim; 2009 Feb; 44(1):106-15. PubMed ID: 19019068 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Effects of chemical activation and season on birth efficiency of cloned pigs. Ma Y; Li Y; Wei H; Li Q; Fang R; Zhao R; Zhang K; Xue K; Lou Y; Dai Y; Lian L; Li N Sci China C Life Sci; 2009 Jul; 52(7):657-64. PubMed ID: 19641871 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Cell-free extract from porcine induced pluripotent stem cells can affect porcine somatic cell nuclear reprogramming. No JG; Choi MK; Kwon DJ; Yoo JG; Yang BC; Park JK; Kim DH J Reprod Dev; 2015; 61(2):90-8. PubMed ID: 25736622 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Nuclear reprogramming in embryos generated by the transfer of yak (Bos grunniens) nuclei into bovine oocytes and comparison with bovine-bovine SCNT and bovine IVF embryos. Li Y; Li S; Dai Y; Du W; Zhao C; Wang L; Wang H; Li R; Liu Y; Wan R; Li N Theriogenology; 2007 May; 67(8):1331-8. PubMed ID: 17416410 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Nuclear transfer in cats and its application. Gómez MC; Pope CE; Dresser BL Theriogenology; 2006 Jul; 66(1):72-81. PubMed ID: 16620927 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Development to the blastocyst stage of immature pig oocytes arrested before the metaphase-II stage and fertilized in vitro. Somfai T; Kikuchi K; Medvedev S; Onishi A; Iwamoto M; Fuchimoto D; Ozawa M; Noguchi J; Kaneko H; Ohnuma K; Sato E; Nagai T Anim Reprod Sci; 2005 Dec; 90(3-4):307-28. PubMed ID: 15899560 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Oocyte genome cloning used in biparental bovine embryo reconstruction. Vichera G; Olivera R; Salamone D Zygote; 2013 Feb; 21(1):21-9. PubMed ID: 22475091 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. in vitro development of porcine enucleated oocytes reconstructed by the transfer of porcine fetal fibroblasts and cumulus cells. Uhm SJ; Chung HM; Kim C; Shim H; Kim NH; Lee HT; Chung KS Theriogenology; 2000 Sep; 54(4):559-70. PubMed ID: 11071130 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. A possible strategy to produce pigs resistant to porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus. Luo B; Ju S; Wang B; Rui R Antiviral Res; 2013 Aug; 99(2):158-64. PubMed ID: 23732571 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Production of transgenic cloned piglets from genetically transformed fetal fibroblasts selected by green fluorescent protein. Lee GS; Kim HS; Hyun SH; Lee SH; Jeon HY; Nam DH; Jeong YW; Kim S; Kim JH; Han JY; Ahn C; Kang SK; Lee BC; Hwang WS Theriogenology; 2005 Mar; 63(4):973-91. PubMed ID: 15710186 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. The expression patterns of DNA methylation reprogramming related genes are associated with the developmental competence of cloned embryos after zygotic genome activation in pigs. Huan Y; Wang H; Wu Z; Zhang J; Liu Z; He H Gene Expr Patterns; 2015; 18(1-2):1-7. PubMed ID: 25917378 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Epigenetic alteration of the donor cells does not recapitulate the reprogramming of DNA methylation in cloned embryos. Wee G; Shim JJ; Koo DB; Chae JI; Lee KK; Han YM Reproduction; 2007 Dec; 134(6):781-7. PubMed ID: 18042635 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Different Donor Cell Culture Methods Can Influence the Developmental Ability of Cloned Sheep Embryos. Ma L; Liu X; Wang F; He X; Chen S; Li W PLoS One; 2015; 10(8):e0135344. PubMed ID: 26291536 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. In vitro development and mitochondrial fate of macaca-rabbit cloned embryos. Yang CX; Han ZM; Wen DC; Sun QY; Zhang KY; Zhang LS; Wu YQ; Kou ZH; Chen DY Mol Reprod Dev; 2003 Aug; 65(4):396-401. PubMed ID: 12840813 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Nuclear transfer in cattle using in vivo-derived vs. in vitro-produced donor embryos: effect of developmental stage. Zakhartchenko V; Reichenbach HD; Riedl J; Palma GA; Wolf E; Brem G Mol Reprod Dev; 1996 Aug; 44(4):493-8. PubMed ID: 8844692 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]