224 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27854309)
1. QSAR Study for Carcinogenic Potency of Aromatic Amines Based on GEP and MLPs.
Song F; Zhang A; Liang H; Cui L; Li W; Si H; Duan Y; Zhai H
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2016 Nov; 13(11):. PubMed ID: 27854309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Carcinogenicity of the aromatic amines: from structure-activity relationships to mechanisms of action and risk assessment.
Benigni R; Passerini L
Mutat Res; 2002 Jul; 511(3):191-206. PubMed ID: 12088717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prediction of rodent carcinogenicity of aromatic amines: a quantitative structure-activity relationships model.
Franke R; Gruska A; Giuliani A; Benigni R
Carcinogenesis; 2001 Sep; 22(9):1561-71. PubMed ID: 11532881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Mechanistic QSAR of aromatic amines: new models for discriminating between homocyclic mutagens and nonmutagens, and validation of models for carcinogens.
Benigni R; Bossa C; Netzeva T; Rodomonte A; Tsakovska I
Environ Mol Mutagen; 2007 Dec; 48(9):754-71. PubMed ID: 18008355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Mechanism-based structure-activity relationship (SAR) analysis of aromatic amines and nitroaromatics carcinogenicity via statistical analyses based on CPDB.
Wan WX; Chen Y; Zhang J; Shen F; Luo L; Deng SH; Xiao H; Zhou W; Deng OP; Yang H; Xiao YL; Huang CR; Tian D; He JS; Wang YJ
Toxicol In Vitro; 2019 Aug; 58():13-25. PubMed ID: 30878698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Quantitative correlation of mutagenic and carcinogenic potencies for heterocyclic amines from cooked foods and additional aromatic amines.
Hatch FT; Knize MG; Moore DH; Felton JS
Mutat Res; 1992 Jun; 271(3):269-87. PubMed ID: 1378200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Correlations of nitrenium ion selectivities with quantitative mutagenicity and carcinogenicity of the corresponding amines.
Novak M; Rajagopal S
Chem Res Toxicol; 2002 Dec; 15(12):1495-503. PubMed ID: 12482231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. QSARs of aromatic amines: identification of potent carcinogens.
Franke R; Gruska A; Bossa C; Benigni R
Mutat Res; 2010 Sep; 691(1-2):27-40. PubMed ID: 20600167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Structural motifs modulating the carcinogenic risk of aromatic amines.
Benigni R; Worth A; Netzeva T; Jeliazkova N; Bossa C; Gruska A; Franke R
Environ Mol Mutagen; 2009 Mar; 50(2):152-61. PubMed ID: 19152383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Variable selection by an evolution algorithm using modified Cp based on MLR and PLS modeling: QSAR studies of carcinogenicity of aromatic amines.
Shen Q; Jiang JH; Shen GL; Yu RQ
Anal Bioanal Chem; 2003 Jan; 375(2):248-54. PubMed ID: 12560968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The alkaline single cell gel electrophoresis assay with mouse multiple organs: results with 30 aromatic amines evaluated by the IARC and U.S. NTP.
Sasaki YF; Fujikawa K; Ishida K; Kawamura N; Nishikawa Y; Ohta S; Satoh M; Madarame H; Ueno S; Susa N; Matsusaka N; Tsuda S
Mutat Res; 1999 Mar; 440(1):1-18. PubMed ID: 10095124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Fisher discriminant analysis for carcinogenic potency of aromatic amines].
Zhu Y; Yu Y; Chen X
Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 1999 Jan; 33(1):21-5. PubMed ID: 11864450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prediction of mutagenicity of aromatic and heteroaromatic amines from structure: a hierarchical QSAR approach.
Basak SC; Mills DR; Balaban AT; Gute BD
J Chem Inf Comput Sci; 2001; 41(3):671-8. PubMed ID: 11410045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of QSARs and characterization of structural basis of bioactivity using partial order theory and formal concept analysis: a case study with mutagenicity.
Restrepo G; Basak SC; Mills D
Curr Comput Aided Drug Des; 2011 Jun; 7(2):109-21. PubMed ID: 21542792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Machine learning predictive classification models for the carcinogenic activity of activated metabolites derived from aromatic amines and nitroaromatics.
Halabi A; Rincón E; Chamorro E
Toxicol In Vitro; 2022 Jun; 81():105347. PubMed ID: 35318113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Quantitative structure-activity relationship investigation of the role of hydrophobicity in regulating mutagenicity in the Ames test: 2. Mutagenicity of aromatic and heteroaromatic nitro compounds in Salmonella Typhimurium TA100.
Debnath AK; Lopez de Compadre RL; Shusterman AJ; Hansch C
Environ Mol Mutagen; 1992; 19(1):53-70. PubMed ID: 1732104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Avoidance of the Ames test liability for aryl-amines via computation.
McCarren P; Bebernitz GR; Gedeck P; Glowienke S; Grondine MS; Kirman LC; Klickstein J; Schuster HF; Whitehead L
Bioorg Med Chem; 2011 May; 19(10):3173-82. PubMed ID: 21524589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. QSAR modelling for mutagenic potency of heteroaromatic amines by optimal SMILES-based descriptors.
Toropov AA; Toropova AP; Benfenati E
Chem Biol Drug Des; 2009 Mar; 73(3):301-12. PubMed ID: 19207466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Quantitative structure-activity (QSAR) relationships of mutagenic aromatic and heterocyclic amines.
Hatch FT; Colvin ME
Mutat Res; 1997 May; 376(1-2):87-96. PubMed ID: 9202742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Predicting the genotoxicity of secondary and aromatic amines using data subsetting to generate a model ensemble.
Mattioni BE; Kauffman GW; Jurs PC; Custer LL; Durham SK; Pearl GM
J Chem Inf Comput Sci; 2003; 43(3):949-63. PubMed ID: 12767154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
