These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27855301)

  • 21. Assessing the perceptual contributions of vowels and consonants to Mandarin sentence intelligibility.
    Chen F; Wong LL; Wong EY
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Aug; 134(2):EL178-84. PubMed ID: 23927222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [The application of cybernetic modeling methods for the forensic medical personality identification based on the voice and sounding speech characteristics].
    Kaganov AS; Kir'yanov PA
    Sud Med Ekspert; 2015; 58(3):40-43. PubMed ID: 26245103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The Influence of Native Language on Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Vocal Samples Completed by Brazilian and Canadian SLPs.
    Chaves CR; Campbell M; Côrtes Gama AC
    J Voice; 2017 Mar; 31(2):258.e1-258.e5. PubMed ID: 27427162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A corpus of noise-induced word misperceptions for Spanish.
    Tóth MA; García Lecumberri ML; Tang Y; Cooke M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Feb; 137(2):EL184-9. PubMed ID: 25698048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [On the use of the spectral speech characteristics for the determination of biometric parameters of the vocal tract in forensic medical identification of the speaker's personality].
    Kaganov ASh
    Sud Med Ekspert; 2014; 57(1):26-9. PubMed ID: 25275181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Speaker identification utilizing noncontemporary speech.
    Hollien H; Schwartz R
    J Forensic Sci; 2001 Jan; 46(1):63-7. PubMed ID: 11210926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The effect of word class on speaker-dependent information in the Standard Dutch vowel /aː/.
    Heeren WFL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2020 Oct; 148(4):2028. PubMed ID: 33138546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A perceptual study of the influence of pitch on the intelligibility of sung vowels.
    Scotto Di Carlo N; Germain A
    Phonetica; 1985; 42(4):188-97. PubMed ID: 3842773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Perception of contrastive bi-syllabic lexical stress in unaccented and accented words by younger and older listeners.
    Gordon-Salant S; Yeni-Komshian GH; Pickett EJ; Fitzgibbons PJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Mar; 139(3):1132-48. PubMed ID: 27036250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Differential effects of speaker and vowel variability on fricative perception.
    Johnson K
    Lang Speech; 1991; 34 ( Pt 3)():265-79. PubMed ID: 1843527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Issues and opportunities: the application of the numerical likelihood ratio framework to forensic speaker comparison.
    Gold E; Hughes V
    Sci Justice; 2014 Jul; 54(4):292-9. PubMed ID: 25002047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The effects of lexical neighbors on stop consonant articulation.
    Goldrick M; Vaughn C; Murphy A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Aug; 134(2):EL172-7. PubMed ID: 23927221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The influence of visual speech information on the intelligibility of English consonants produced by non-native speakers.
    Kawase S; Hannah B; Wang Y
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Sep; 136(3):1352. PubMed ID: 25190408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Accounting for the listener: comparing the production of contrastive intonation in typically-developing speakers and speakers with autism.
    Kaland C; Swerts M; Krahmer E
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Sep; 134(3):2182-96. PubMed ID: 23967948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Phonetic considerations in the design of voice assessment material.
    Abberton E
    Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2005; 30(3-4):175-80. PubMed ID: 16287659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Effects of speaker variability and noise on Mandarin fricative identification by native and non-native listeners.
    Lee CY; Zhang Y; Li X; Tao L; Bond ZS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Aug; 132(2):1130-40. PubMed ID: 22894232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Rhythmic variability between speakers: articulatory, prosodic, and linguistic factors.
    Dellwo V; Leemann A; Kolly MJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Mar; 137(3):1513-28. PubMed ID: 25786962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Speaker-individuality in suprasegmental temporal features: Implications for forensic voice comparison.
    Leemann A; Kolly MJ; Dellwo V
    Forensic Sci Int; 2014 May; 238():59-67. PubMed ID: 24675042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Recognition memory in noise for speech of varying intelligibility.
    Gilbert RC; Chandrasekaran B; Smiljanic R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Jan; 135(1):389-99. PubMed ID: 24437779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Sine-wave and noise-vocoded sine-wave speech in a tone language: Acoustic details matter.
    Rosen S; Hui SN
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Dec; 138(6):3698-702. PubMed ID: 26723325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.