200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27855661)
1. Comparison of the complications of traditional 12 cores transrectal prostate biopsy with image fusion guided transperineal prostate biopsy.
Huang H; Wang W; Lin T; Zhang Q; Zhao X; Lian H; Guo H
BMC Urol; 2016 Nov; 16(1):68. PubMed ID: 27855661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Transperineal Versus Transrectal MRI/TRUS Fusion Targeted Biopsy: Detection Rate of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer.
Pepe P; Garufi A; Priolo G; Pennisi M
Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2017 Feb; 15(1):e33-e36. PubMed ID: 27530436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The eternal enigma in prostatic biopsy access route.
Fabiani A; Principi E; Filosa A; Servi L
Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2017 Oct; 89(3):245-246. PubMed ID: 28969413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Multiparametric MRI/TRUS Fusion Prostate Biopsy: Advantages of a Transperineal Approach.
Pepe P; Garufi A; Priolo GD; Pennisi M
Anticancer Res; 2017 Jun; 37(6):3291-3294. PubMed ID: 28551679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Transperineal Versus Transrectal Targeted Biopsy With Use of Electromagnetically-tracked MR/US Fusion Guidance Platform for the Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer.
Winoker JS; Wajswol E; Falagario U; Maritini A; Moshier E; Voutsinas N; Knauer CJ; Sfakianos JP; Lewis SC; Taouli BA; Rastinehad AR
Urology; 2020 Dec; 146():278-286. PubMed ID: 32956688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of free-hand transperineal mpMRI/TRUS fusion-guided biopsy with transperineal 12-core systematic biopsy for the diagnosis of prostate cancer: a single-center prospective study in China.
Zhang Q; Wang W; Zhang B; Shi J; Fu Y; Li D; Guo S; Zhang S; Huang H; Jiang X; Zhou W; Guo H
Int Urol Nephrol; 2017 Mar; 49(3):439-448. PubMed ID: 28005230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Critical evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging targeted, transrectal ultrasound guided transperineal fusion biopsy for detection of prostate cancer.
Kuru TH; Roethke MC; Seidenader J; Simpfendörfer T; Boxler S; Alammar K; Rieker P; Popeneciu VI; Roth W; Pahernik S; Schlemmer HP; Hohenfellner M; Hadaschik BA
J Urol; 2013 Oct; 190(4):1380-6. PubMed ID: 23608676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A retrospective comparison between transrectal and transperineal prostate biopsy in the detection of prostate cancer.
Di Franco CA; Jallous H; Porru D; Giliberto GL; Cebrelli T; Tinelli C; Rovereto B
Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2017 Mar; 89(1):55-59. PubMed ID: 28403597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Do cancer detection rates differ between transperineal and transrectal micro-ultrasound mpMRI-fusion-targeted prostate biopsies? A propensity score-matched study.
Rakauskas A; Peters M; Martel P; van Rossum PSN; La Rosa S; Meuwly JY; Roth B; Valerio M
PLoS One; 2023; 18(1):e0280262. PubMed ID: 36652429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of transperineal and transrectal targeted prostate biopsy using Mahalanobis distance matching within propensity score caliper method: A multicenter study of Turkish Urooncology Association.
Koparal MY; Sözen TS; Karşıyakalı N; Aslan G; Akdoğan B; Şahin B; Türkeri L;
Prostate; 2022 Mar; 82(4):425-432. PubMed ID: 34927740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Magnetic Resonance and Ultrasound Image Fusion Supported Transperineal Prostate Biopsy Using the Ginsburg Protocol: Technique, Learning Points, and Biopsy Results.
Hansen N; Patruno G; Wadhwa K; Gaziev G; Miano R; Barrett T; Gnanapragasam V; Doble A; Warren A; Bratt O; Kastner C
Eur Urol; 2016 Aug; 70(2):332-40. PubMed ID: 26995327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A noninferiority within-person study comparing the accuracy of transperineal to transrectal MRI-US fusion biopsy for prostate-cancer detection.
Ber Y; Segal N; Tamir S; Benjaminov O; Yakimov M; Sela S; Halstauch D; Baniel J; Kedar D; Margel D
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2020 Sep; 23(3):449-456. PubMed ID: 31953483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Transperineal Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Ultrasound Fusion Targeted Prostate Biopsy Combined with Standard Template Improves Prostate Cancer Detection.
Kim MM; Wu S; Lin SX; Crotty RK; Harisinghani M; Feldman AS; Wu CL; Dahl DM
J Urol; 2022 Jan; 207(1):86-94. PubMed ID: 34428921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Transrectal versus transperineal prostate biopsy in detection of prostate cancer: a retrospective study based on 452 patients.
Lu M; Luo Y; Wang Y; Yu J; Zheng H; Yang Z
BMC Urol; 2023 Jan; 23(1):11. PubMed ID: 36709292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A systematic review and meta-analysis of magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound guided fusion biopsy of prostate for cancer detection-Comparing transrectal with transperineal approaches.
Loy LM; Lim GH; Leow JJ; Lee CH; Tan TW; Tan CH
Urol Oncol; 2020 Aug; 38(8):650-660. PubMed ID: 32505458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prostate Cancer Detection and Complications of Transperineal Versus Transrectal Magnetic Resonance Imaging-fusion Guided Prostate Biopsies.
Buller D; Sahl J; Staff I; Tortora J; Pinto K; McLaughlin T; Olivo Valentin L; Wagner J
Urology; 2023 Jul; 177():109-114. PubMed ID: 37059232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparative study of transperineal software-assisted magnetic resonance/ultrasound fusion biopsy and transrectal cognitive fusion biopsy of the prostate.
Hsieh PF; Chang TY; Lin WC; Chang H; Chang CH; Huang CP; Yang CR; Chen WC; Chang YH; Wang YD; Huang WC; Wu HC
BMC Urol; 2022 Apr; 22(1):72. PubMed ID: 35488246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of MRI/Ultrasound Fusion-Guided Prostate Biopsy Using Transrectal and Transperineal Approaches.
Tewes S; Peters I; Tiemeyer A; Peperhove M; Hartung D; Pertschy S; Kuczyk MA; Wacker F; Hueper K
Biomed Res Int; 2017; 2017():2176471. PubMed ID: 29094042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of In-Office MRI/US Fusion Transperineal Prostate Biopsy via Free-hand Device during Routine Clinical Practice.
Briggs LG; Kim M; Gusev A; Rumpf F; Feldman A; McGovern F; Tabatabaei S; Dahl DM
Urology; 2021 Sep; 155():26-32. PubMed ID: 34048827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of complications rates between multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging-transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) fusion and systematic TRUS prostatic biopsies.
Queiroz MRG; Falsarella PM; Mariotti GC; Lemos GC; Baroni RH; Mussi TC; Garcia RG
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2019 Feb; 44(2):732-738. PubMed ID: 30255444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
