These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
23. Amalgam or composite resin? Factors influencing the choice of restorative material. Correa MB; Peres MA; Peres KG; Horta BL; Barros AD; Demarco FF J Dent; 2012 Sep; 40(9):703-10. PubMed ID: 22546263 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. An evaluation of replacement rates for posterior resin-based composite and amalgam restorations in U.S. Navy and marine corps recruits. Simecek JW; Diefenderfer KE; Cohen ME J Am Dent Assoc; 2009 Feb; 140(2):200-9; quiz 249. PubMed ID: 19188417 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. In vivo and in vitro evaluations of microleakage around Class I amalgam and composite restorations. Alptekin T; Ozer F; Unlu N; Cobanoglu N; Blatz MB Oper Dent; 2010; 35(6):641-8. PubMed ID: 21180003 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Selective enamel etching: effect on marginal adaptation of self-etch LED-cured bond systems in aged Class I composite restorations. Souza-Junior EJ; Prieto LT; Araújo CT; Paulillo LA Oper Dent; 2012; 37(2):195-204. PubMed ID: 22313271 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Evaluation of occlusal marginal adaptation of Class II resin-composite restorations. Kreulen CM; van Amerongen WE; Akerboom HB; Borgmeijer PJ; Gruythuysen RJ ASDC J Dent Child; 1993; 60(4-5):310-4. PubMed ID: 8258575 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Radiographic assessments of Class II resin composite restorations in a clinical study: baseline results. Kreulen CM; van Amerongen WE; Akerboom HB; Borgmeijer PJ; Gruythuysen RJ ASDC J Dent Child; 1992; 59(2):97-107. PubMed ID: 1583203 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Clinical longevity of extensive direct composite restorations in amalgam replacement: up to 3.5 years follow-up. Scholtanus JD; Ozcan M J Dent; 2014 Nov; 42(11):1404-10. PubMed ID: 24994619 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Twelve-year survival of 2-surface composite resin and amalgam premolar restorations placed by dental students. Naghipur S; Pesun I; Nowakowski A; Kim A J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Sep; 116(3):336-9. PubMed ID: 27086110 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. A review of polymerization shrinkage stress: current techniques for posterior direct resin restorations. Giachetti L; Scaminaci Russo D; Bambi C; Grandini R J Contemp Dent Pract; 2006 Sep; 7(4):79-88. PubMed ID: 16957794 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Amalgam, composite resin and glass ionomer cement in Class II restorations in primary molars--a three year clinical evaluation. Ostlund J; Möller K; Koch G Swed Dent J; 1992; 16(3):81-6. PubMed ID: 1496459 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. A retrospective clinical study on longevity of posterior composite and amalgam restorations. Opdam NJ; Bronkhorst EM; Roeters JM; Loomans BA Dent Mater; 2007 Jan; 23(1):2-8. PubMed ID: 16417916 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Amalgam Phase-Down Part 1: UK-Based Posterior Restorative Material and Technique Use. Bailey O; Vernazza CR; Stone S; Ternent L; Roche AG; Lynch C JDR Clin Trans Res; 2022 Jan; 7(1):41-49. PubMed ID: 33300416 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Real-time measurement of dentinal fluid flow during amalgam and composite restoration. Kim SY; Ferracane J; Kim HY; Lee IB J Dent; 2010 Apr; 38(4):343-51. PubMed ID: 20060432 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. [Despite all--do we have an appropriate substitute for amalgam?]. Levin L; Samorodnitzky-Naveh G; Coval M; Geiger SB Refuat Hapeh Vehashinayim (1993); 2008 Apr; 25(2):23-6, 73. PubMed ID: 18780542 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]