284 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27857250)
1. Advantages and Limitations of Wearable Activity Trackers: Considerations for Patients and Clinicians.
Walker RK; Hickey AM; Freedson PS
Clin J Oncol Nurs; 2016 Dec; 20(6):606-610. PubMed ID: 27857250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluating Motivational Interviewing and Habit Formation to Enhance the Effect of Activity Trackers on Healthy Adults' Activity Levels: Randomized Intervention.
Ellingson LD; Lansing JE; DeShaw KJ; Peyer KL; Bai Y; Perez M; Phillips LA; Welk GJ
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2019 Feb; 7(2):e10988. PubMed ID: 30762582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A qualitative evaluation of breast cancer survivors' acceptance of and preferences for consumer wearable technology activity trackers.
Nguyen NH; Hadgraft NT; Moore MM; Rosenberg DE; Lynch C; Reeves MM; Lynch BM
Support Care Cancer; 2017 Nov; 25(11):3375-3384. PubMed ID: 28540402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Diffusion of the Digital Health Self-Tracking Movement in Canada: Results of a National Survey.
Paré G; Leaver C; Bourget C
J Med Internet Res; 2018 May; 20(5):e177. PubMed ID: 29720359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Promise of Wearable Physical Activity Monitors in Oncology Practice.
Beg MS; Gupta A; Stewart T; Rethorst CD
J Oncol Pract; 2017 Feb; 13(2):82-89. PubMed ID: 28387544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Usefulness of Modern Activity Trackers for Monitoring Exercise Behavior in Chronic Cardiac Patients: Validation Study.
Herkert C; Kraal JJ; van Loon EMA; van Hooff M; Kemps HMC
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2019 Dec; 7(12):e15045. PubMed ID: 31855191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Data management and wearables in older adults: A systematic review.
Alharbi M; Straiton N; Smith S; Neubeck L; Gallagher R
Maturitas; 2019 Jun; 124():100-110. PubMed ID: 30910279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clusters of Adolescent Physical Activity Tracker Patterns and Their Associations With Physical Activity Behaviors in Finland and Ireland: Cross-Sectional Study.
Ng K; Kokko S; Tammelin T; Kallio J; Belton S; O'Brien W; Murphy M; Powell C; Woods C
J Med Internet Res; 2020 Sep; 22(9):e18509. PubMed ID: 32667894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Acceptability and feasibility of a Fitbit physical activity monitor for endometrial cancer survivors.
Rossi A; Frechette L; Miller D; Miller E; Friel C; Van Arsdale A; Lin J; Shankar V; Kuo DYS; Nevadunsky NS
Gynecol Oncol; 2018 Jun; 149(3):470-475. PubMed ID: 29692337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Parental Perspectives of a Wearable Activity Tracker for Children Younger Than 13 Years: Acceptability and Usability Study.
Mackintosh KA; Chappel SE; Salmon J; Timperio A; Ball K; Brown H; Macfarlane S; Ridgers ND
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2019 Nov; 7(11):e13858. PubMed ID: 31682585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Acceptance of Commercially Available Wearable Activity Trackers Among Adults Aged Over 50 and With Chronic Illness: A Mixed-Methods Evaluation.
Mercer K; Giangregorio L; Schneider E; Chilana P; Li M; Grindrod K
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2016 Jan; 4(1):e7. PubMed ID: 26818775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Accuracy of Activity Trackers in Parkinson Disease: Should We Prescribe Them?
Wendel N; Macpherson CE; Webber K; Hendron K; DeAngelis T; Colon-Semenza C; Ellis T
Phys Ther; 2018 Aug; 98(8):705-714. PubMed ID: 29718452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The Use of Wearable Activity Trackers Among Older Adults: Focus Group Study of Tracker Perceptions, Motivators, and Barriers in the Maintenance Stage of Behavior Change.
Kononova A; Li L; Kamp K; Bowen M; Rikard RV; Cotten S; Peng W
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2019 Apr; 7(4):e9832. PubMed ID: 30950807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Interest and preferences for using advanced physical activity tracking devices: results of a national cross-sectional survey.
Alley S; Schoeppe S; Guertler D; Jennings C; Duncan MJ; Vandelanotte C
BMJ Open; 2016 Jul; 6(7):e011243. PubMed ID: 27388359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparison of wearable fitness devices.
Kaewkannate K; Kim S
BMC Public Health; 2016 May; 16():433. PubMed ID: 27220855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Reliability and validity of two fitness tracker devices in the laboratory and home environment for older community-dwelling people.
Burton E; Hill KD; Lautenschlager NT; Thøgersen-Ntoumani C; Lewin G; Boyle E; Howie E
BMC Geriatr; 2018 May; 18(1):103. PubMed ID: 29724191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The Wearable Activity Tracker Checklist for Healthcare (WATCH): a 12-point guide for the implementation of wearable activity trackers in healthcare.
Szeto K; Arnold J; Maher C
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act; 2024 Mar; 21(1):30. PubMed ID: 38481238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Harnessing the Potential of Wearable Activity Trackers for Heart Failure Self-Care.
Alharbi M; Straiton N; Gallagher R
Curr Heart Fail Rep; 2017 Feb; 14(1):23-29. PubMed ID: 28181075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Habit Formation in Wearable Activity Tracker Use Among Older Adults: Qualitative Study.
Peng W; Li L; Kononova A; Cotten S; Kamp K; Bowen M
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2021 Jan; 9(1):e22488. PubMed ID: 33464216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Use of consumer wearable devices to promote physical activity among breast, prostate, and colorectal cancer survivors: a review of health intervention studies.
Coughlin SS; Caplan LS; Stone R
J Cancer Surviv; 2020 Jun; 14(3):386-392. PubMed ID: 31933148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
