209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27857546)
1. Comparison of Meat Quality and Fatty Acid Composition of
Choi YS; Lee JK; Jung JT; Jung YC; Jung JH; Jung MO; Choi YI; Jin SK; Choi JS
Korean J Food Sci Anim Resour; 2016 Oct; 36(5):689-696. PubMed ID: 27857546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of Carcass Characteristics and Meat Quality between Duroc and Crossbred Pigs.
Choi JS; Lee HJ; Jin SK; Choi YI; Lee JJ
Korean J Food Sci Anim Resour; 2014; 34(2):238-44. PubMed ID: 26760944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Meat Quality and Physicochemical Trait Assessments of
Subramaniyan SA; Kang DR; Belal SA; Cho ES; Jung JH; Jung YC; Choi YI; Shim KS
Korean J Food Sci Anim Resour; 2016 Oct; 36(5):641-649. PubMed ID: 27857540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effects of Sex and Breed on Meat Quality and Sensory Properties in Three-way Crossbred Pigs Sired by Duroc or by a Synthetic Breed Based on a Korean Native Breed.
Kim YM; Choi TJ; Ho Cho K; Cho ES; Lee JJ; Chung HJ; Baek SY; Jeong YD
Korean J Food Sci Anim Resour; 2018 Jul; 38(3):544-553. PubMed ID: 30018498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Physicochemical properties of
Kim GW; Kim HY
J Anim Sci Technol; 2018; 60():6. PubMed ID: 29610673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of physicochemical traits of dry-cured ham from purebred Berkshire and crossbred Landrace × Yorkshire × Duroc (LYD) pigs.
Yim DG; Jung JH; Ali MM; Nam KC
J Anim Sci Technol; 2019 Jan; 61(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 31333859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Carcass composition and meat quality of Chinese purebred and European × Chinese crossbred pigs.
Suzuki A; Kojima N; Ikeuchi Y; Ikarashi S; Moriyama N; Ishizuka T; Tokushige H
Meat Sci; 1991; 29(1):31-41. PubMed ID: 22060970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Quality Comparison of Pork Loin and Belly from Three-way Crossbred Pigs during Postmortem Storage.
Lim DG; Jo C; Cha JS; Seo KS; Nam KC
Korean J Food Sci Anim Resour; 2014; 34(2):185-91. PubMed ID: 26760937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Carcass characteristics and meat quality of purebred Pakchong 5 and crossbred pigs sired by Pakchong 5 or Duroc boar.
Lertpatarakomol R; Chaosap C; Chaweewan K; Sitthigripong R; Limsupavanich R
Asian-Australas J Anim Sci; 2019 Apr; 32(4):585-591. PubMed ID: 30208699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Estimated frequency of the RN- allele in Swedish Hampshire pigs and comparison of glycolytic potential, carcass composition, and technological meat quality among Swedish Hampshire, Landrace, and Yorkshire pigs.
Enfält AC; Lundström K; Karlsson A; Hansson I
J Anim Sci; 1997 Nov; 75(11):2924-35. PubMed ID: 9374306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison between Berkshire and crossbreed on meat quality, and investigation of the relationship with fatty acid composition and meat quality.
Seo JK; Eom JU; Yang HS
J Anim Sci Technol; 2023 Sep; 65(5):1081-1093. PubMed ID: 37969337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dietary Valine/Isoleucine Ratio Impact Carcass Characteristics, Meat Edible Quality and Nutritional Values in Finishing Crossbred Duroc × Landrace × Yorkshire Pigs With Different Slaughter Weights.
Xu D; Wang Y; Zhang X; Yan E; He L; Wang L; Ma C; Zhang P; Yin J
Front Nutr; 2022; 9():899871. PubMed ID: 35898709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Meat quality comparison of Berkshire, Duroc and crossbred pigs sired by Berkshire and Duroc.
Suzuki K; Shibata T; Kadowaki H; Abe H; Toyoshima T
Meat Sci; 2003 May; 64(1):35-42. PubMed ID: 22062660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effects of outdoor rearing and sire breed (Duroc or Yorkshire) on carcass composition and sensory and technological meat quality.
Enfält AC; Lundström K; Hansson I; Lundeheim N; Nyström PE
Meat Sci; 1997 Jan; 45(1):1-15. PubMed ID: 22061132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Meat and nutritional quality comparison of purebred and crossbred pigs.
Zhang J; Chai J; Luo Z; He H; Chen L; Liu X; Zhou Q
Anim Sci J; 2018 Jan; 89(1):202-210. PubMed ID: 28856768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The genetic background affects composition, oxidative stability and quality traits of Iberian dry-cured hams: purebred Iberian versus reciprocal Iberian × Duroc crossbred pigs.
Fuentes V; Ventanas S; Ventanas J; Estévez M
Meat Sci; 2014 Feb; 96(2 Pt A):737-43. PubMed ID: 24200565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of Duroc- vs. Pietrain-sired pigs for carcass and meat quality measures.
Edwards DB; Bates RO; Osburn WN
J Anim Sci; 2003 Aug; 81(8):1895-9. PubMed ID: 12926770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of Duroc and British landrace pigs for meat a and eating quality.
Cameron ND; Warriss PD; Porter SJ; Enser MB
Meat Sci; 1990; 27(3):227-47. PubMed ID: 22055287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison and correlation analysis of different Swine breeds meat quality.
Li YX; Cabling MM; Kang HS; Kim TS; Yeom SC; Sohn YG; Kim SH; Nam KC; Seo KS
Asian-Australas J Anim Sci; 2013 Jul; 26(7):905-10. PubMed ID: 25049866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of pork belly characteristics and weights of primal cuts between gilt and barrow of Landrace × Yorkshire × Duroc pigs measured by AutoFomIII.
Ko E; Park Y; Park K; Woo C; Kim J; Kim K; Choi J
J Anim Sci Technol; 2023 Mar; 65(2):412-426. PubMed ID: 37093947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
