These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
308 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27858132)
1. Ligament shortening compared to vaginal colpopexy at the time of hysterectomy for pelvic organ prolapse. Fairchild PS; Kamdar NS; Rosen ER; Swenson CW; Fenner DE; DeLancey JO; Morgan DM Int Urogynecol J; 2017 Jun; 28(6):899-905. PubMed ID: 27858132 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Laparoscopic Uterosacral Ligament Hysteropexy vs Total Vaginal Hysterectomy with Uterosacral Ligament Suspension for Anterior and Apical Prolapse: Surgical Outcome and Patient Satisfaction. Haj-Yahya R; Chill HH; Levin G; Reuveni-Salzman A; Shveiky D J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020 Jan; 27(1):88-93. PubMed ID: 30802607 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Sacrospinous hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension in women with uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: observational follow-up of a multicentre randomised trial. Schulten SFM; Detollenaere RJ; Stekelenburg J; IntHout J; Kluivers KB; van Eijndhoven HWF BMJ; 2019 Sep; 366():l5149. PubMed ID: 31506252 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Risk factors for pelvic organ prolapse recurrence after sacrospinous hysteropexy or vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension. Schulten SF; Detollenaere RJ; IntHout J; Kluivers KB; Van Eijndhoven HW Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Aug; 227(2):252.e1-252.e9. PubMed ID: 35439530 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Vaginal versus robotic hysterectomy and concomitant pelvic support surgery: a comparison of postoperative vaginal length and sexual function. De La Cruz JF; Myers EM; Geller EJ J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2014; 21(6):1010-4. PubMed ID: 24780383 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Incidence of adverse events after uterosacral colpopexy for uterovaginal and posthysterectomy vault prolapse. Unger CA; Walters MD; Ridgeway B; Jelovsek JE; Barber MD; Paraiso MF Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 May; 212(5):603.e1-7. PubMed ID: 25434838 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Laparoscopic fixation of the vaginal cuff to the uterosacral ligaments at the time of hysterectomy. Nishimura K; Yoshimura K; Hoshino K; Hachisuga T Int Urogynecol J; 2017 Feb; 28(2):321-323. PubMed ID: 27614758 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Modified extraperitoneal uterosacral ligament suspension for prevention of vault prolapse after vaginal hysterectomy. Pal M; Bandyopadhyay S Int Urogynecol J; 2019 Apr; 30(4):633-637. PubMed ID: 29777272 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Transvaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Hysterectomy and Apical Suspension of the Vaginal Cuff to the Uterosacral Ligament. Lowenstein L; Baekelandt J; Paz Y; Lauterbach R; Matanes E J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2019; 26(6):1015. PubMed ID: 30980991 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. RCT of vaginal extraperitoneal uterosacral ligament suspension (VEULS) with anterior mesh versus sacrocolpopexy: 4-year outcome. Ow LL; Lim YN; Lee J; Murray C; Thomas E; Leitch A; Rosamilia A; Dwyer PL Int Urogynecol J; 2018 Nov; 29(11):1607-1614. PubMed ID: 29961110 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Recurrent apical prolapse after high uterosacral ligament suspension - in a heterogenous cohort characterised by a high prevalence of previous pelvic operations. Pedersen KD; Storkholm MH; Bek KM; Glavind-Kristensen M; Greisen S BMC Womens Health; 2019 Jul; 19(1):96. PubMed ID: 31299946 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Sacrospinous hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy with suspension of the uterosacral ligaments in women with uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: multicentre randomised non-inferiority trial. Detollenaere RJ; den Boon J; Stekelenburg J; IntHout J; Vierhout ME; Kluivers KB; van Eijndhoven HW BMJ; 2015 Jul; 351():h3717. PubMed ID: 26206451 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Sacrospinous hysteropexy: review and meta-analysis of outcomes. Kapoor S; Sivanesan K; Robertson JA; Veerasingham M; Kapoor V Int Urogynecol J; 2017 Sep; 28(9):1285-1294. PubMed ID: 28258346 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Comparison outcomes of three surgical procedures in treatment of severe pelvic organ prolapse and analysis of risk factors for genital prolapse recurrence]. Hu CD; Chen YS; Yi XF; Ding JX; Feng WW; Yao LQ; Huang J; Zhang Y; Hu WG; Zhu ZL; Hua KQ Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2011 Feb; 46(2):94-100. PubMed ID: 21426765 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Abdominal and vaginal pelvic support with concomitant hysterectomy for uterovaginal pelvic prolapse: a comparative systematic review and meta-analysis. Alfahmy A; Mahran A; Conroy B; Brewka RR; Ibrahim M; Sheyn D; El-Nashar SA; Hijaz A Int Urogynecol J; 2021 Aug; 32(8):2021-2031. PubMed ID: 34050771 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]