305 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27858205)
1. Statistical inference in abstracts of major medical and epidemiology journals 1975-2014: a systematic review.
Stang A; Deckert M; Poole C; Rothman KJ
Eur J Epidemiol; 2017 Jan; 32(1):21-29. PubMed ID: 27858205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Statistical Inference in Abstracts Published in Cardiovascular Journals.
Stang A; Deckert M; Stolpe S
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2021 Mar; 77(12):1554-1561. PubMed ID: 33766262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The reporting of
Messam LLM; Weng HY; Rosenberger NWY; Tan ZH; Payet SDM; Santbakshsing M
PeerJ; 2021; 9():e12453. PubMed ID: 34900418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reporting of Statistical Inference in Abstracts of Major Cancer Journals, 1990 to 2020.
Stang A; Schmidt B
JAMA Netw Open; 2022 Jun; 5(6):e2218337. PubMed ID: 35737386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Quality of statistical reporting in developmental disability journals.
Namasivayam AK; Yan T; Wong WY; van Lieshout P
Int J Rehabil Res; 2015 Dec; 38(4):364-9. PubMed ID: 26478965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Tracing scientific reasoning in psychiatry: Reporting of statistical inference in abstracts of top journals 1975-2015.
Baethge C; Deckert M; Stang A
Int J Methods Psychiatr Res; 2018 Aug; 27(3):e1735. PubMed ID: 30073728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Confidence intervals permit, but do not guarantee, better inference than statistical significance testing.
Coulson M; Healey M; Fidler F; Cumming G
Front Psychol; 2010; 1():26. PubMed ID: 21607077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Reporting trends of p values in the neurosurgical literature.
To MS; Jukes A
J Neurosurg; 2019 Feb; 132(2):662-670. PubMed ID: 30738384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The null hypothesis significance test in health sciences research (1995-2006): statistical analysis and interpretation.
Silva-Ayçaguer LC; Suárez-Gil P; Fernández-Somoano A
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2010 May; 10():44. PubMed ID: 20482841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Fisher, Neyman-Pearson or NHST? A tutorial for teaching data testing.
Perezgonzalez JD
Front Psychol; 2015; 6():223. PubMed ID: 25784889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Statistical inference in abstracts of three influential clinical pharmacology journals analyzed using a text-mining algorithm.
Amiri M; Deckert M; Michel MC; Poole C; Stang A
Br J Clin Pharmacol; 2021 Mar; ():4173-4182. PubMed ID: 33769597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Survey of quality and clarity of methods and results reporting in 1 year of intervention studies published in high-impact medical and psychiatric journals.
Ravichandran C; Babb SM; Ongur D; Harris PQ; Cohen BM
BMJ Open; 2022 Dec; 12(12):e061882. PubMed ID: 36523238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Moving Beyond p < 0.05 in Ecotoxicology: A Guide for Practitioners.
Erickson RA; Rattner BA
Environ Toxicol Chem; 2020 Sep; 39(9):1657-1669. PubMed ID: 32539165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Impact Factors and Prediction of Popular Topics in a Journal.
Nielsen MB; Seitz K
Ultraschall Med; 2016 Aug; 37(4):343-5. PubMed ID: 27490462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Neuroscience Needs to Test Both Statistical and Scientific Hypotheses.
Alger BE
J Neurosci; 2022 Nov; 42(45):8432-8438. PubMed ID: 36351823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Bayesian inference of population prevalence.
Ince RA; Paton AT; Kay JW; Schyns PG
Elife; 2021 Oct; 10():. PubMed ID: 34612811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The quality of reporting of trial abstracts is suboptimal: survey of major general medical journals.
Berwanger O; Ribeiro RA; Finkelsztejn A; Watanabe M; Suzumura EA; Duncan BB; Devereaux PJ; Cook D
J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Apr; 62(4):387-92. PubMed ID: 19010643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Thou Shalt Not Bear False Witness Against Null Hypothesis Significance Testing.
García-Pérez MA
Educ Psychol Meas; 2017 Aug; 77(4):631-662. PubMed ID: 30034024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Current controversies: Null hypothesis significance testing.
Sedgwick PM; Hammer A; Kesmodel US; Pedersen LH
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2022 Jun; 101(6):624-627. PubMed ID: 35451497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The researcher and the consultant: from testing to probability statements.
Hamra GB; Stang A; Poole C
Eur J Epidemiol; 2015 Sep; 30(9):1003-8. PubMed ID: 26108655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
