203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27858916)
1. Evaluating rectal tumor staging with magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography, and endoluminal ultrasound: A meta-analysis.
Li XT; Zhang XY; Sun YS; Tang L; Cao K
Medicine (Baltimore); 2016 Nov; 95(44):e5333. PubMed ID: 27858916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluating local lymph node metastasis with magnetic resonance imaging, endoluminal ultrasound and computed tomography in rectal cancer: a meta-analysis.
Li XT; Sun YS; Tang L; Cao K; Zhang XY
Colorectal Dis; 2015 Jun; 17(6):O129-35. PubMed ID: 25628186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. EUS versus magnetic resonance imaging in staging rectal adenocarcinoma: a diagnostic test accuracy meta-analysis.
Chan BPH; Patel R; Mbuagbaw L; Thabane L; Yaghoobi M
Gastrointest Endosc; 2019 Aug; 90(2):196-203.e1. PubMed ID: 31004599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Comparison of magnetic resonance (0,5 T), computed tomography, and endorectal ultrasonography in the preoperative staging of neoplasms of the rectum-sigma. Correlation with surgical and anatomopathologic findings].
Golfieri R; Giampalma E; Leo P; Colecchia A; Selleri S; Poggioli G; Gandolfi L; Gozzetti G; Trebbi F; Russo A
Radiol Med; 1993 Jun; 85(6):773-83. PubMed ID: 8337435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Diagnostic Accuracy of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Restaging of Rectal Cancer After Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review.
Wei MZ; Zhao ZH; Wang JY
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2020; 44(1):102-110. PubMed ID: 31939890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Rectal cancer staging: Multidetector-row computed tomography diagnostic accuracy in assessment of mesorectal fascia invasion.
Ippolito D; Drago SG; Franzesi CT; Fior D; Sironi S
World J Gastroenterol; 2016 May; 22(20):4891-900. PubMed ID: 27239115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effectiveness of preoperative staging in rectal cancer: digital rectal examination, endoluminal ultrasound or magnetic resonance imaging?
Brown G; Davies S; Williams GT; Bourne MW; Newcombe RG; Radcliffe AG; Blethyn J; Dallimore NS; Rees BI; Phillips CJ; Maughan TS
Br J Cancer; 2004 Jul; 91(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 15188013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. EUS and magnetic resonance imaging in the staging of rectal cancer: a prospective and comparative study.
Fernández-Esparrach G; Ayuso-Colella JR; Sendino O; Pagés M; Cuatrecasas M; Pellisé M; Maurel J; Ayuso-Colella C; González-Suárez B; Llach J; Castells A; Ginès A
Gastrointest Endosc; 2011 Aug; 74(2):347-54. PubMed ID: 21802588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Diagnostic Accuracy of MRI for Assessment of T Category and Circumferential Resection Margin Involvement in Patients With Rectal Cancer: A Meta-Analysis.
Zhang G; Cai YZ; Xu GH
Dis Colon Rectum; 2016 Aug; 59(8):789-99. PubMed ID: 27384098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Endoscopic ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging for re-staging rectal cancer after radiotherapy.
Mezzi G; Arcidiacono PG; Carrara S; Perri F; Petrone MC; De Cobelli F; Gusmini S; Staudacher C; Del Maschio A; Testoni PA
World J Gastroenterol; 2009 Nov; 15(44):5563-7. PubMed ID: 19938195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Staging of rectal carcinoma: MDCT, MRI or EUS. Single center experience.
Kocaman O; Baysal B; Şentürk H; İnce AT; Müslümanoğlu M; Kocakoç E; Arıcı S; Uysal Ö; Yıldız K; Türkdoğan K; Danalıoğlu A
Turk J Gastroenterol; 2014 Dec; 25(6):669-73. PubMed ID: 25599779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Endoscopic ultrasound and endorectal magnetic resonance imaging: a prospective, comparative study for preoperative staging and follow-up of rectal cancer.
Meyenberger C; Huch Böni RA; Bertschinger P; Zala GF; Klotz HP; Krestin GP
Endoscopy; 1995 Sep; 27(7):469-79. PubMed ID: 8565885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Optimal methods for staging rectal cancer.
Muthusamy VR; Chang KJ
Clin Cancer Res; 2007 Nov; 13(22 Pt 2):6877s-84s. PubMed ID: 18006793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Imaging for predicting the risk factors--the circumferential resection margin and nodal disease--of local recurrence in rectal cancer: a meta-analysis.
Lahaye MJ; Engelen SM; Nelemans PJ; Beets GL; van de Velde CJ; van Engelshoven JM; Beets-Tan RG
Semin Ultrasound CT MR; 2005 Aug; 26(4):259-68. PubMed ID: 16152740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A prospective comparison of endorectal ultrasound and pelvic magnetic resonance in the preoperative staging of rectal cancer.
Bianchi P; Ceriani C; Palmisano A; Pompili G; Passoni GR; Rottoli M; Cappellani A; Montorsi M
Ann Ital Chir; 2006; 77(1):41-6. PubMed ID: 16910358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Efficacy of 3-dimensional endorectal ultrasonography compared with conventional ultrasonography and computed tomography in preoperative rectal cancer staging.
Kim JC; Kim HC; Yu CS; Han KR; Kim JR; Lee KH; Jang SJ; Lee SS; Ha HK
Am J Surg; 2006 Jul; 192(1):89-97. PubMed ID: 16769283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Restaging of locally advanced rectal cancer with magnetic resonance imaging and endoluminal ultrasound after preoperative chemoradiotherapy: a systemic review and meta-analysis.
Zhao RS; Wang H; Zhou ZY; Zhou Q; Mulholland MW
Dis Colon Rectum; 2014 Mar; 57(3):388-95. PubMed ID: 24509465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Local diagnostics for rectal cancer. What is realistic?].
Ptok H; Gastinger I; Lippert H
Chirurg; 2012 May; 83(5):448-51. PubMed ID: 22573247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A prospective analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of 3 T MRI, CT and endoscopic ultrasound for preoperative T staging of potentially resectable esophageal cancer.
Guo J; Wang Z; Qin J; Zhang H; Liu W; Zhao Y; Lu Y; Yan X; Zhang Z; Zhang T; Zhang S; Dominik NM; Kamel IR; Li H; Qu J
Cancer Imaging; 2020 Sep; 20(1):64. PubMed ID: 32912319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparison between the reference values of MRI and EUS and their usefulness to surgeons in rectal cancer.
Yimei J; Ren Z; Lu X; Huan Z
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci; 2012 Dec; 16(15):2069-77. PubMed ID: 23280021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
