These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27859163)

  • 21. Age and sex differences in numerical responses, dietary shifts, and total responses of a generalist predator to population dynamics of main prey.
    Masoero G; Laaksonen T; Morosinotto C; Korpimäki E
    Oecologia; 2020 Mar; 192(3):699-711. PubMed ID: 32008080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The alternative prey hypothesis revisited: Still valid for willow ptarmigan population dynamics.
    Breisjøberget JI; Odden M; Wegge P; Zimmermann B; Andreassen H
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(6):e0197289. PubMed ID: 29874270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Let's go beyond taxonomy in diet description: testing a trait-based approach to prey-predator relationships.
    Spitz J; Ridoux V; Brind'Amour A
    J Anim Ecol; 2014 Sep; 83(5):1137-48. PubMed ID: 24645977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Mesopredator suppression by an apex predator alleviates the risk of predation perceived by small prey.
    Gordon CE; Feit A; Grüber J; Letnic M
    Proc Biol Sci; 2015 Mar; 282(1802):. PubMed ID: 25652837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Consequences of size structure in the prey for predator-prey dynamics: the composite functional response.
    Rudolf VH
    J Anim Ecol; 2008 May; 77(3):520-8. PubMed ID: 18284478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Cyclic dynamics in a simple vertebrate predator-prey community.
    Gilg O; Hanski I; Sittler B
    Science; 2003 Oct; 302(5646):866-8. PubMed ID: 14593179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Population and behavioural responses of native prey to alien predation.
    Kovacs EK; Crowther MS; Webb JK; Dickman CR
    Oecologia; 2012 Apr; 168(4):947-57. PubMed ID: 22042524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Climate change and perishable food hoards of an avian predator: Is the freezer still working?
    Masoero G; Laaksonen T; Morosinotto C; Korpimäki E
    Glob Chang Biol; 2020 Oct; 26(10):5414-5430. PubMed ID: 32738026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Herbivore population suppression by an intermediate predator, Phytoseiulus macropilis, is insensitive to the presence of an intraguild predator: an advantage of small body size?
    Rosenheim JA; Limburg DD; Colfer RG; Fournier V; Hsu CL; Leonardo TE; Nelson EH
    Oecologia; 2004 Aug; 140(4):577-85. PubMed ID: 15278424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. What do predators really want? The role of gerbil energetic state in determining prey choice by Barn Owls.
    Embar K; Mukherjee S; Kotler BP
    Ecology; 2014 Feb; 95(2):280-5. PubMed ID: 24669722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Foraging and vulnerability traits modify predator-prey body mass allometry: freshwater macroinvertebrates as a case study.
    Klecka J; Boukal DS
    J Anim Ecol; 2013 Sep; 82(5):1031-41. PubMed ID: 23869526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Ratio- and predator-dependent functional forms for predators optimally foraging in patches.
    Anderson JJ
    Am Nat; 2010 Feb; 175(2):240-9. PubMed ID: 20028238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Predator diet breadth influences the relative importance of bottom-up and top-down control of prey biomass and diversity.
    Jiang L; Morin PJ
    Am Nat; 2005 Mar; 165(3):350-63. PubMed ID: 15729665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Resource dynamics influence the strength of non-consumptive predator effects on prey.
    Preisser EL; Bolnick DI; Grabowski JH
    Ecol Lett; 2009 Apr; 12(4):315-23. PubMed ID: 19243407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. How detectable is predation in stage-structured populations? Insights from a simulation-testing analysis.
    Oken KL; Essington TE
    J Anim Ecol; 2015 Jan; 84(1):60-70. PubMed ID: 25056097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Competition in di- and tri-trophic food web modules.
    Křivan V
    J Theor Biol; 2014 Feb; 343():127-37. PubMed ID: 24316384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Mechanistic model for the allee effect and interference in predator population].
    Tiutiunov IuV; Titova LI; Berdnikov SV
    Biofizika; 2013; 58(2):349-56. PubMed ID: 23755563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Energetic conditions promoting top-down control of prey by predators.
    Marshall KN; Essington TE
    PLoS One; 2011; 6(12):e29723. PubMed ID: 22216348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The Lotka-Volterra predator-prey model with foraging-predation risk trade-offs.
    Krivan V
    Am Nat; 2007 Nov; 170(5):771-82. PubMed ID: 17926298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Predators with multiple ontogenetic niche shifts have limited potential for population growth and top-down control of their prey.
    van Leeuwen A; Huss M; Gårdmark A; Casini M; Vitale F; Hjelm J; Persson L; de Roos AM
    Am Nat; 2013 Jul; 182(1):53-66. PubMed ID: 23778226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.