These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27859265)

  • 1. Does movement behaviour predict population densities? A test with 25 butterfly species.
    Schultz CB; Pe'er BG; Damiani C; Brown L; Crone EE
    J Anim Ecol; 2017 Mar; 86(2):384-393. PubMed ID: 27859265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Relative Contribution of Matrix Structure, Patch Resources and Management to the Local Densities of Two Large Blue Butterfly Species.
    Kajzer-Bonk J; Skórka P; Nowicki P; Bonk M; Król W; Szpiłyk D; Woyciechowski M
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(12):e0168679. PubMed ID: 28005942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Quantitative analysis of changes in movement behaviour within and outside habitat in a specialist butterfly.
    Schtickzelle N; Joiris A; Van Dyck H; Baguette M
    BMC Evol Biol; 2007 Jan; 7():4. PubMed ID: 17241457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Minimum area requirements for an at-risk butterfly based on movement and demography.
    Brown LM; Crone EE
    Conserv Biol; 2016 Feb; 30(1):103-12. PubMed ID: 26174312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Response of butterflies to structural and resource boundaries.
    Schultz CB; Franco AM; Crone EE
    J Anim Ecol; 2012 May; 81(3):724-34. PubMed ID: 22272654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. How complex do models need to be to predict dispersal of threatened species through matrix habitats?
    Hudgens BR; Morris WF; Haddad NM; Fields WR; Wilson JW; Kuefler D; Jobe T
    Ecol Appl; 2012 Jul; 22(5):1701-10. PubMed ID: 22908724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Faster movement in nonhabitat matrix promotes range shifts in heterogeneous landscapes.
    Crone EE; Brown LM; Hodgson JA; Lutscher F; Schultz CB
    Ecology; 2019 Jul; 100(7):e02701. PubMed ID: 31087809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Old models explain new observations of butterfly movement at patch edges.
    Crone EE; Schultz CB
    Ecology; 2008 Jul; 89(7):2061-7. PubMed ID: 18705391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Restricted within-habitat movement and time-constrained egg laying of female Maculinea rebeli butterflies.
    Korösi A; Orvössy N; Batáry P; Kövér S; Peregovits L
    Oecologia; 2008 May; 156(2):455-64. PubMed ID: 18305965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparing organic farming and land sparing: optimizing yield and butterfly populations at a landscape scale.
    Hodgson JA; Kunin WE; Thomas CD; Benton TG; Gabriel D
    Ecol Lett; 2010 Nov; 13(11):1358-67. PubMed ID: 20825453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The conflicting role of matrix habitats as conduits and barriers for dispersal.
    Kuefler D; Hudgens B; Haddad NM; Morris WF; Thurgate N
    Ecology; 2010 Apr; 91(4):944-50. PubMed ID: 20462109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Nonrandom movement behavior at habitat boundaries in two butterfly species: implications for dispersal.
    Conradt L; Roper TJ
    Ecology; 2006 Jan; 87(1):125-32. PubMed ID: 16634303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dispersal and extinction in fragmented landscapes.
    Thomas CD
    Proc Biol Sci; 2000 Jan; 267(1439):139-45. PubMed ID: 10687818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Biased correlated random walk and foray loop: which movement hypothesis drives a butterfly metapopulation?
    McIntire EJ; Rompré G; Severns PM
    Oecologia; 2013 May; 172(1):293-305. PubMed ID: 23180420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Determinants of extinction-colonization dynamics in Mediterranean butterflies: the role of landscape, climate and local habitat features.
    Fernández-Chacón A; Stefanescu C; Genovart M; Nichols JD; Hines JE; Páramo F; Turco M; Oro D
    J Anim Ecol; 2014 Jan; 83(1):276-85. PubMed ID: 23957287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Estimating Brownian motion dispersal rate, longevity and population density from spatially explicit mark-recapture data on tropical butterflies.
    Tufto J; Lande R; Ringsby TH; Engen S; Saether BE; Walla TR; DeVries PJ
    J Anim Ecol; 2012 Jul; 81(4):756-69. PubMed ID: 22320218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The importance of including habitat-specific behaviour in models of butterfly movement.
    Evans LC; Sibly RM; Thorbek P; Sims I; Oliver TH; Walters RJ
    Oecologia; 2020 Jun; 193(2):249-259. PubMed ID: 32253493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evidence for positive density-dependent emigration in butterfly metapopulations.
    Nowicki P; Vrabec V
    Oecologia; 2011 Nov; 167(3):657-65. PubMed ID: 21625981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Non-random dispersal in the butterfly Maniola jurtina: implications for metapopulation models.
    Conradt L; Bodsworth EJ; Roper TJ; Thomas CD
    Proc Biol Sci; 2000 Aug; 267(1452):1505-10. PubMed ID: 11007325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Do live fences help conserve butterfly diversity in agricultural landscapes?].
    Tobar L DE; Ibrahim M
    Rev Biol Trop; 2010 Mar; 58(1):447-63. PubMed ID: 20411734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.