BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

100 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27859302)

  • 1. Secondary distinctiveness effects: Orthographic distinctiveness andĀ bizarreness effects make independent contributions to memory performance.
    Gounden Y; Cerroti F; Nicolas S
    Scand J Psychol; 2017 Feb; 58(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 27859302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Ageing and secondary-distinctiveness-based effects: the orthographic distinctiveness effect is more robust than the bizarreness effect.
    Gounden Y; Nicolas S
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(9):1820-32. PubMed ID: 22524538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The impact of processing time on the bizarreness and orthographic distinctiveness effects.
    Gounden Y; Nicolas S
    Scand J Psychol; 2012 Aug; 53(4):287-94. PubMed ID: 22448903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Investigating secondary-distinctiveness-based effects in aging and Alzheimer's disease patients.
    Gounden Y; Nicolas S
    Scand J Psychol; 2015 Jun; 56(3):283-9. PubMed ID: 25810073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Orthographic distinctiveness and semantic elaboration provide separate contributions to memory.
    Kirchhoff BA; Schapiro ML; Buckner RL
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2005 Dec; 17(12):1841-54. PubMed ID: 16356323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The curious case of orthographic distinctiveness: Disruption of categorical processing.
    McDaniel MA; Cahill MJ; Bugg JM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2016 Jan; 42(1):104-13. PubMed ID: 26237617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Aging, imagery, and the bizarreness effect.
    Black SR; McCown S; Lookadoo RL; Leonard RC; Kelley M; DeCoster J; Wayde E; Spence SA
    Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn; 2012 Sep; 19(5):566-91. PubMed ID: 22248375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The bizarreness effect: it's not surprising, it's complex.
    McDaniel MA; Einstein GO; DeLosh EL; May CP; Brady P
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1995 Mar; 21(2):422-435. PubMed ID: 7738508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Disentangling encoding versus retrieval explanations of the bizarreness effect: implications for distinctiveness.
    McDaniel MA; Dornburg CC; Guynn MJ
    Mem Cognit; 2005 Mar; 33(2):270-9. PubMed ID: 16028582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Is the picture bizarreness effect a generation effect?
    Marchal A; Nicolas S
    Psychol Rep; 2000 Aug; 87(1):331-40. PubMed ID: 11026434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bizarreness and Typicality Effects of Color on Object Recognition Memory.
    Morita A; Kambara T
    Percept Mot Skills; 2021 Dec; 128(6):2469-2489. PubMed ID: 34605317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A context-change account of temporal distinctiveness.
    Siefke BM; Smith TA; Sederberg PB
    Mem Cognit; 2019 Aug; 47(6):1158-1172. PubMed ID: 30912034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Distinctiveness and the attentional boost effect.
    Smith SA; Mulligan NW
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 Sep; 44(9):1464-1473. PubMed ID: 29389185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The bizarreness effect and visual imagery: No impact of concurrent visuo-spatial distractor tasks indicates little role for visual imagery.
    Besken M; Mulligan NW
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2022 Sep; 48(9):1281-1295. PubMed ID: 34351199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Tests of a cognitive-resource-allocation account of the bizarreness effect.
    Worthen JB; Garcia-Rivas G; Green CR; Vidos RA
    J Gen Psychol; 2000 Apr; 127(2):117-44. PubMed ID: 10843256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Order information and retrieval distinctiveness: recall of common versus bizarre material.
    McDaniel MA; DeLosh EL; Merritt PS
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2000 Jul; 26(4):1045-56. PubMed ID: 10946377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects on free recall and recognition of transforming visually presented words and pictures into trace or imagery form.
    Joseph CA; Joseph CR; Beasley C
    J Gen Psychol; 1982 Jan; 106(1st Half):21-6. PubMed ID: 7057165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Perceptual identification, fragment completion, and free recall: concepts and data.
    Hunt RR; Toth JP
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1990 Mar; 16(2):282-90. PubMed ID: 2137867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A disruptive effect of bizarreness on memory for relational and contextual details of self-performed and other-performed acts.
    Worthen JB; Wood VV
    Am J Psychol; 2001; 114(4):535-46. PubMed ID: 11789339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Memory discrimination for self-performed and imagined acts: bizarreness effects in false recognition.
    Worthen JB; Wood VV
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2001 Feb; 54(1):49-67. PubMed ID: 11216321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.