These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

312 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27859645)

  • 1. Ultrathin versus pediatric instruments for colonoscopy in older female patients: A randomized trial.
    Nemoto D; Utano K; Endo S; Isohata N; Hewett DG; Togashi K
    Dig Endosc; 2017 Mar; 29(2):168-174. PubMed ID: 27859645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Propofol sedation for colonoscopy with a new ultrathin or a standard endoscope: a prospective randomized controlled study.
    Töx U; Schumacher B; Toermer T; Terheggen G; Mertens J; Holzapfel B; Lehmacher W; Goeser T; Neuhaus H
    Endoscopy; 2013 Jun; 45(6):439-44. PubMed ID: 23468196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A prospective randomized study of the use of an ultrathin colonoscope versus a pediatric colonoscope in sedation-optional colonoscopy.
    Sato K; Ito S; Kitagawa T; Hirahata K; Hihara D; Tominaga K; Yasuda I; Maetani I
    Surg Endosc; 2017 Dec; 31(12):5150-5158. PubMed ID: 28488178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Meta-analysis of the performance of ultrathin vs. standard colonoscopes.
    Sofi AA; Nawras A; Khan MA; Howden CW; Lee WM
    Endoscopy; 2017 Apr; 49(4):351-358. PubMed ID: 27852099
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A randomized comparison of ultrathin and standard colonoscope in cecal intubation rate and patient tolerance.
    Luo DJ; Hui AJ; Yan KK; Ng SC; Wong VW; Chan FK; Cheong JP; Lam PP; Tse YK; Lau JY
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2012 Mar; 75(3):484-90. PubMed ID: 21963069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of discomfort during colonoscopy with conventional and ultrathin colonoscopes in ulcerative colitis patients.
    Ogawa T; Ohda Y; Nagase K; Kono T; Tozawa K; Tomita T; Iimuro M; Hida N; Oshima T; Fukui H; Hori K; Watari J; Nakamura S; Miwa H
    Dig Endosc; 2015 Jan; 27(1):99-105. PubMed ID: 24995962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Ultrathin colonoscope with a diameter of 9.8 mm for total colonoscopy.
    Okamoto M; Kawabe T; Kato J; Yamaji Y; Ikenoue T; Omata M
    J Clin Gastroenterol; 2005 Sep; 39(8):679-83. PubMed ID: 16082276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Intermediate-length colonoscope needs more training duration than long-length colonoscope.
    Kim YG; Kim KJ; Yang DH; Ye BD; Byeon JS; Myung SJ; Yang SK; Kim JH
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 2014 Aug; 49(8):1007-13. PubMed ID: 24957569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Impact of experience with a retrograde-viewing device on adenoma detection rates and withdrawal times during colonoscopy: the Third Eye Retroscope study group.
    DeMarco DC; Odstrcil E; Lara LF; Bass D; Herdman C; Kinney T; Gupta K; Wolf L; Dewar T; Deas TM; Mehta MK; Anwer MB; Pellish R; Hamilton JK; Polter D; Reddy KG; Hanan I
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2010 Mar; 71(3):542-50. PubMed ID: 20189513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Long pediatric colonoscope versus intermediate length adult colonoscope for colonoscopy.
    Hsieh YH; Zhou AL; Lin HJ
    J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2008 Jul; 23(7 Pt 2):e7-e10. PubMed ID: 18702687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A prospective randomized study on the benefits of a new small-caliber colonoscope.
    Sato K; Ito S; Shigiyama F; Kitagawa T; Hirahata K; Tominaga K; Maetani I
    Endoscopy; 2012 Aug; 44(8):746-53. PubMed ID: 22833021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reduced pain during screening colonoscopy with an ultrathin colonoscope: a randomized controlled trial.
    Garborg KK; Løberg M; Matre J; Holme O; Kalager M; Hoff G; Bretthauer M
    Endoscopy; 2012 Aug; 44(8):740-6. PubMed ID: 22622786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Expanding the view of a standard colonoscope with the Third Eye Panoramic cap.
    Rubin M; Lurie L; Bose K; Kim SH
    World J Gastroenterol; 2015 Oct; 21(37):10683-7. PubMed ID: 26457029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A prospective trial of variable stiffness colonoscopes with different tip diameters in unsedated patients.
    Chen PJ; Shih YL; Chu HC; Chang WK; Hsieh TY; Chao YC
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2008 Jun; 103(6):1365-71. PubMed ID: 18513270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Does "responsive insertion technology" improve practice of colonoscopy? Results of a randomized study.
    Cuesta R; Sola-Vera J; Uceda F; García Sepulcre MF; Morillo E; Vázquez N
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 2014 Mar; 49(3):355-61. PubMed ID: 24417584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A retrograde-viewing device improves detection of adenomas in the colon: a prospective efficacy evaluation (with videos).
    Waye JD; Heigh RI; Fleischer DE; Leighton JA; Gurudu S; Aldrich LB; Li J; Ramrakhiani S; Edmundowicz SA; Early DS; Jonnalagadda S; Bresalier RS; Kessler WR; Rex DK
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2010 Mar; 71(3):551-6. PubMed ID: 20018280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Variable stiffness colonoscopes are associated with less pain during colonoscopy in unsedated patients.
    Yoshikawa I; Honda H; Nagata K; Kanda K; Yamasaki T; Kume K; Tabaru A; Otsuki M
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2002 Dec; 97(12):3052-5. PubMed ID: 12492189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cap-assisted gastroscope versus cap-assisted colonoscope for examination of difficult sigmoid colons in a nonsedated Asian population: a randomized study.
    Kim DH; Park SY; Park CH; Ki HS; Jun CH; Kim HS; Choi SK; Rew JS
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2014 May; 79(5):790-7. PubMed ID: 24210653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Impact of bending section length on insertion and retroflexion properties of pediatric and adult colonoscopes.
    Kessler WR; Rex DK
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2005 Jun; 100(6):1290-5. PubMed ID: 15929759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cecal insertion and withdrawal times with wide-angle versus standard colonoscopes: a randomized controlled trial.
    Fatima H; Rex DK; Rothstein R; Rahmani E; Nehme O; Dewitt J; Helper D; Toor A; Bensen S
    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2008 Jan; 6(1):109-14. PubMed ID: 18065277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.