212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27859671)
21. Analysis of factors with low positive predictive value in the diagnosis of urinary tract infection by flow cytometry.
Zhang G; Dai Z; Yao Y; Yu X; Gao Y; Liang XM; Chen M
World J Urol; 2023 Dec; 41(12):3611-3618. PubMed ID: 37898576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Urine flow cytometry as a primary screening method to exclude urinary tract infections.
Boonen KJ; Koldewijn EL; Arents NL; Raaymakers PA; Scharnhorst V
World J Urol; 2013 Jun; 31(3):547-51. PubMed ID: 22588552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Identification of gram positive cocci isolated from urine.
Mathai E; Margaret A; George V; Brahmadathan KN
Indian J Med Res; 1994 Jul; 100():10-4. PubMed ID: 7927545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The development and validation of different decision-making tools to predict urine culture growth out of urine flow cytometry parameter.
Müller M; Seidenberg R; Schuh SK; Exadaktylos AK; Schechter CB; Leichtle AB; Hautz WE
PLoS One; 2018; 13(2):e0193255. PubMed ID: 29474463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Factors associated with specific uropathogens in catheter-associated urinary tract infection: developing a clinical prediction model.
Oh WS; Hur JA; Kim ES; Park KH; Choi HK; Moon C; Kim BN
J Int Med Res; 2014 Dec; 42(6):1335-47. PubMed ID: 25256381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. [CORRESPONDENCE OF POLYMICROBIAL BACTERIURIA IN THE UNCOMPLICATED URINARY TRACT INFECTION OF THE PREMENOPAUSAL WOMAN].
Sato T; Fujita H; Takahashi M; Hatta M; Aoki H; Ishidoya S
Nihon Hinyokika Gakkai Zasshi; 2017; 108(1):24-29. PubMed ID: 29367505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Enhancing clinical decision-making: Sysmex UF-5000 as a screening tool for bacterial urinary tract infection in children.
Liu P; Ban C; Wang J; Zeng Q; Chen M; Wang L; Lv X
PLoS One; 2024; 19(6):e0304286. PubMed ID: 38865329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Urine Flow Cytometry in the Diagnosis of Urinary Tract Infection.
Conkar S; Mir S
Indian J Pediatr; 2018 Nov; 85(11):995-999. PubMed ID: 29696457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. [Performance analysis of the Sysmex UF4000/UD10 for diagnosis of urinary tract infections].
Allain M; Sun K; Predal C; Nassif X; Ferroni A
Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 2019 Dec; 77(6):645-650. PubMed ID: 31859641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Analysis of pathogens isolated from urinary tract infections in Barbados.
Levett PN
West Indian Med J; 1993 Jun; 42(2):72-6. PubMed ID: 8367968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Evaluation of Three Bacterial Identification Systems for Species Identification of Bacteria Isolated from Bovine Mastitis and Bulk Tank Milk Samples.
Savage E; Chothe S; Lintner V; Pierre T; Matthews T; Kariyawasam S; Miller D; Tewari D; Jayarao B
Foodborne Pathog Dis; 2017 Mar; 14(3):177-187. PubMed ID: 28128639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. [Monitoring of uropathogens and their susceptibility to antibiotics].
Savitskaia KI; Trapeznikova MF; Nesterova MV; Rusanova EV
Antibiot Khimioter; 2001; 46(6):12-20. PubMed ID: 11573319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Evaluation of the in vitro growth of urinary tract infection-causing gram-negative and gram-positive bacteria in a proposed synthetic human urine (SHU) medium.
Ipe DS; Ulett GC
J Microbiol Methods; 2016 Aug; 127():164-171. PubMed ID: 27312379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Use of flow cytometry (Sysmex) UF-100) to screen for positive urine cultures: in search for the ideal cut-off.
Brilha S; Proença H; Cristino JM; Hänscheid T
Clin Chem Lab Med; 2010 Feb; 48(2):289-92. PubMed ID: 19961394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Comparative evaluation of two commercial chromogenic media for detection and presumptive identification of urinary tract pathogens.
Scarparo C; Piccoli P; Ricordi P; Scagnelli M
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 2002 Apr; 21(4):283-9. PubMed ID: 12072939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Direct inoculation method using BacT/ALERT 3D and BD Phoenix System allows rapid and accurate identification and susceptibility testing for both Gram-positive cocci and Gram-negative rods in aerobic blood cultures.
Yonetani S; Okazaki M; Araki K; Makino H; Fukugawa Y; Okuyama T; Ohnishi H; Watanabe T
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 2012 Jun; 73(2):129-34. PubMed ID: 22494554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. [Value of urine sediment analyzer in the screening of urinary tract infection in cancer patients].
Zheng C; Han X; Feng S; Wang J; Yin M; Cheng Y; Qi J
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2016 Jan; 38(1):35-9. PubMed ID: 26796804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Diagnosis of Urinary Tract Infections by Urine Flow Cytometry: Adjusted Cut-Off Values in Different Clinical Presentations.
Schuh SK; Seidenberg R; Arampatzis S; Leichtle AB; Hautz WE; Exadaktylos AK; Schechter CB; Müller M
Dis Markers; 2019; 2019():5853486. PubMed ID: 30944667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Evaluation of the automated urine particle analyzer UF-1000i screening for urinary tract infection in nonpregnant women.
Dai Q; Jiang Y; Shi H; Zhou W; Zhou S; Yang H
Clin Lab; 2014; 60(2):275-80. PubMed ID: 24660541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Broad identification of bacterial type in urinary tract infection using (1)h NMR spectroscopy.
Gupta A; Dwivedi M; Mahdi AA; Khetrapal CL; Bhandari M
J Proteome Res; 2012 Mar; 11(3):1844-54. PubMed ID: 22292465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
