These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

282 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27859943)

  • 1. A comparison of entropy balance and probability weighting methods to generalize observational cohorts to a population: a simulation and empirical example.
    Harvey RA; Hayden JD; Kamble PS; Bouchard JR; Huang JC
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2017 Apr; 26(4):368-377. PubMed ID: 27859943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Model misspecification and bias for inverse probability weighting estimators of average causal effects.
    Waernbaum I; Pazzagli L
    Biom J; 2023 Feb; 65(2):e2100118. PubMed ID: 36045099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Instrumental variables and inverse probability weighting for causal inference from longitudinal observational studies.
    Hogan JW; Lancaster T
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2004 Feb; 13(1):17-48. PubMed ID: 14746439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. High-dimensional propensity score algorithm in comparative effectiveness research with time-varying interventions.
    Neugebauer R; Schmittdiel JA; Zhu Z; Rassen JA; Seeger JD; Schneeweiss S
    Stat Med; 2015 Feb; 34(5):753-81. PubMed ID: 25488047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. On variance estimation of target population created by inverse probability weighting.
    Chen J; Chen R; Feng Y; Tan M; Chen P; Wu Y
    J Biopharm Stat; 2024 Aug; 34(5):661-679. PubMed ID: 37621147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of multiple imputation approaches for handling missing covariate information in a case-cohort study with a binary outcome.
    Middleton M; Nguyen C; Moreno-Betancur M; Carlin JB; Lee KJ
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2022 Apr; 22(1):87. PubMed ID: 35369860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Inverse probability weighting (IPW) for evaluating and "correcting" selection bias].
    Narduzzi S; Golini MN; Porta D; Stafoggia M; Forastiere F
    Epidemiol Prev; 2014; 38(5):335-41. PubMed ID: 25387748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The alarming problems of confounding equivalence using logistic regression models in the perspective of causal diagrams.
    Yu Y; Li H; Sun X; Su P; Wang T; Liu Y; Yuan Z; Liu Y; Xue F
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Dec; 17(1):177. PubMed ID: 29281984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. On variance estimate for covariate adjustment by propensity score analysis.
    Zou B; Zou F; Shuster JJ; Tighe PJ; Koch GG; Zhou H
    Stat Med; 2016 Sep; 35(20):3537-48. PubMed ID: 26999553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Propensity score weighting under limited overlap and model misspecification.
    Zhou Y; Matsouaka RA; Thomas L
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2020 Dec; 29(12):3721-3756. PubMed ID: 32693715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Impact of outcome model misspecification on regression and doubly-robust inverse probability weighting to estimate causal effect.
    Lefebvre G; Gustafson P
    Int J Biostat; 2010; 6(2):Article 15. PubMed ID: 21969999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Missing Data in Marginal Structural Models: A Plasmode Simulation Study Comparing Multiple Imputation and Inverse Probability Weighting.
    Liu SH; Chrysanthopoulou SA; Chang Q; Hunnicutt JN; Lapane KL
    Med Care; 2019 Mar; 57(3):237-243. PubMed ID: 30664611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A simulation-based evaluation of methods to estimate the impact of an adverse event on hospital length of stay.
    Samore MH; Shen S; Greene T; Stoddard G; Sauer B; Shinogle J; Nebeker J; Harbarth S
    Med Care; 2007 Oct; 45(10 Supl 2):S108-15. PubMed ID: 17909368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Adjusting for Confounding in Early Postlaunch Settings: Going Beyond Logistic Regression Models.
    Schmidt AF; Klungel OH; Groenwold RH;
    Epidemiology; 2016 Jan; 27(1):133-42. PubMed ID: 26436519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A Simulation Study Comparing the Performance of Time-Varying Inverse Probability Weighting and G-Computation in Survival Analysis.
    Rudolph JE; Schisterman EF; Naimi AI
    Am J Epidemiol; 2023 Jan; 192(1):102-110. PubMed ID: 36124667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Inverse probability weighting to handle attrition in cohort studies: some guidance and a call for caution.
    Metten MA; Costet N; Multigner L; Viel JF; Chauvet G
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2022 Feb; 22(1):45. PubMed ID: 35172753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Inverse probability weighting is an effective method to address selection bias during the analysis of high dimensional data.
    Carry PM; Vanderlinden LA; Dong F; Buckner T; Litkowski E; Vigers T; Norris JM; Kechris K
    Genet Epidemiol; 2021 Sep; 45(6):593-603. PubMed ID: 34130352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect Estimation in Point-Exposure Studies with Binary Outcomes and High-Dimensional Covariate Data - A Comparison of Targeted Maximum Likelihood Estimation and Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting.
    Pang M; Schuster T; Filion KB; Schnitzer ME; Eberg M; Platt RW
    Int J Biostat; 2016 Nov; 12(2):. PubMed ID: 27889705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Propensity score weighting for covariate adjustment in randomized clinical trials.
    Zeng S; Li F; Wang R; Li F
    Stat Med; 2021 Feb; 40(4):842-858. PubMed ID: 33174296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Propensity score analysis methods with balancing constraints: A Monte Carlo study.
    Li Y; Li L
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2021 Apr; 30(4):1119-1142. PubMed ID: 33525962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.